Jump to content

Trimandeep Singh

Members
  • Posts

    303
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by Trimandeep Singh

  1. 9 hours ago, paapiman said:

    Aren't ਰ and ਲ replaceable at times?

    For example,

    TARWAAR and TALWAAR mean the same thing.

    Below is a phrase from a Teeka. See it says "Amritsar WARA", which probably means "Amritsar WALA".

     

    image.png.1412d0a07b502712cb43cdb8d3d92cb8.png

     

    Bhul chuk maaf

    I don't think this is applicable everywhere. I think it's because of difference in pronouniciation in various areas, from region to region. 

    Trimandeep Singh 

  2. 44 minutes ago, paapiman said:

    It has multiple meanings.

    Please see below:

    ਸੰ. ਜ੍ਯੋਤਿ (ज्योतिस्) ਸੰਗ੍ਯਾ- ਚਮਕ. ਪ੍ਰਕਾਸ਼. ਰੌਸ਼ਨੀ. "ਨਾ ਸੂਰਜ ਚੰਦ ਨ ਜੋਤਿ ਅਪਾਰ." (ਗੂਜ ਅਃ ਮਃ ੧) ੨. ਚਮਤਕਾਰੀ ਬੁੱਧਿ. "ਜਾਣਹੁ ਜੋਤਿ, ਨ ਪੁਛਹੁ ਜਾਤੀ." (ਆਸਾ ਮਃ ੧) ੩. ਅਗਨਿ. "ਜੋਤਿ ਸ਼ਾਂਤ ਜਿਮਿ ਵਾਰਿ ਕਰ." (ਸਲੋਹ) ੪. ਸੂਰਜ, ਚੰਦ੍ਰਮਾ ਅਤੇ ਨਛਤ੍ਰ। ੫. ਪਰਮਾਤਮਾ. ਵਾਹਗੁਰੂ. "ਸਭ ਮਹਿ ਜੋਤਿ ਜੋਤਿ ਹੈ ਸੋਇ." (ਸੋਹਿਲਾ) ੬. ਆਤਮਿਕ ਰੌਸ਼ਨੀ. ਰੂਹਾਨੀ ਰੌਸ਼ਨੀ. (ਪ੍ਰਭਾ ਕਬੀਰ) "ਪੂਰਨ ਜੋਤਿ ਜਗੈ ਘਟ ਮੇ." (੩੩ ਸਵੈਯੇ) ੭. ਚਾਂਦਨੀ. ਚੰਦ੍ਰਿਕਾ। ੮. ਨੇਤ੍ਰਾਂ ਦੀ ਰੌਸ਼ਨੀ. "ਨੈਨਨ ਜੋਤਿ ਗਈ ਘਟਕੈ." (ਗੁਪ੍ਰਸੂ)

     

    Bhul chuk maaf

    Oh I see it does mean fire. Okay

    42 minutes ago, paapiman said:

    Naamdharis read SRI UGGARDANTI SAHIB JEE, while doing Havan.

    It makes sense. as it has a reference to Havan.

    Man, please don't bring naamdharis. They also have their own kachi banis which they consider equal to Guru Sahib's bani.

    Except, nihangs, I don't think any samprada does this. (I am not targeting nihangs)

     

    Trimandeep Singh 

  3. 3 hours ago, paapiman said:

    But bro, you have to be consistent now in your thinking.

    How can Paras Kala of Gurbani, NOT have an effect on one of the PRIMARY elements (Fire) of creation?

    You already know that our body also has 5 Tats, one of which is Agni.

     

    Bhul chuk maaf

    Yes bro I do believe in paras Kala of Gurbani.

    When we read bani near water, it makes it amrit and when we consume it, it does have effect on us. Surprisingly, science has also proved it. 

    When we normally read bani, then I don't think it purifies air. I think bani changes the vibrations around us but doesn't do anything to air. (Eg: if you read bani near polluted water, it will not purify all the gandh from it. It will still be impure)

    When we talk about fire, I can't think of any effect it will have on fire.

    If we talk about earth. I don't know what effect will it do the land/earth.

    And I don't know why but the name of the fifth element is not striking in the mind of this moorakh right now.

    Bhul chuk maaf

    Trimandeep Singh 

  4. 8 hours ago, Lioness1 said:

    A mother loves her child unconditionally, even if the're a plonker. The respect level just differs. He loves unconditonally. Some bhagats become so after janams and janams of sinning. Noone is perfect, everyone is the Same, just on different stages of their journey's. God is the great forgiver, don't forget people such as Sajjan Thug the serial killer who became a Bhagat.

    I believe he loves all but gives more love to his bhagats. He loves everyone but it is we who don't want to be with him because we don't realize the reality and think this world is our destination. Also because he loves all, he always gives a second chance to us to do bhagti.

     

    8 hours ago, Lioness1 said:

    Tell me how many times have you messed up in the 5 thieves of lust, anger, greed, envy and jealousy, ego and attachment? Are you perfect? All is perfect and all is Karam. 

    I am a moorakh and not at all perfect. And not ALL is Karam.

    The karams which you are referring to are Sanchit and Prahlabdh karams. It is because of these karams that some are born poor, some are born with missing body parts etc. The reaction to these karams are our Vartman Karams. And we are JUDGED on the basis of these karams. If we don't have enough naam Kamaayi, then on the basis of all these karams our joon is decided.

    We don't realize the reality that Vaheguru is everywhere and he's an ocean and the creation is water drops. And because we are living in this illusion, we end up doing bad karams.

    9 hours ago, Lioness1 said:

    It's a khel, a game.

    ਕਰਮ ਧਰਮ ਤੁਮ੍ਹ ਚਉਪੜਿ ਸਾਜਹੁ ਸਤੁ ਕਰਹੁ ਤੁਮ੍ਹ ਸਾਰੀ ॥
    Let righteous actions be your gameboard, and let the truth be your dice.

    ਕਾਮੁ ਕ੍ਰੋਧੁ ਲੋਭੁ ਮੋਹੁ ਜੀਤਹੁ ਐਸੀ ਖੇਲ ਹਰਿ ਪਿਆਰੀ ॥੨॥
    Conquer sexual desire, anger, greed and worldly attachment; only such a game as this is dear to the Lord. ||2||

    9 hours ago, Lioness1 said:

    When you start to see beyond duality, you begin to stop getting sucked into it

    Yes, but only rare gursikhs reach their avastha when they just live as a drishta (spectator) and realizes that only Akaal Purakh is the karta (doer) and bhugta (don't know the word).

     

    9 hours ago, Lioness1 said:

    We are Nothing, we are noone to judge when all is karam/ hukam. 

    We are noone to judge but the system of Joons (which are based on naam Kamaayi and karams) operates under hukam of Vaheguru.

     

    Bhul chuk maaf

    Trimandeep Singh 

  5. 11 hours ago, paapiman said:

    ਣਹੁ ਤੁਮ; ਭਵਾਨੀ ਹਮਨ ਕੀ ਪੁਕਾਰੇ ॥

    Oh Sri Akaal Purakh jee, listen to the pleas of Bhavani Devi and mine.

    I think this vishraam is wrong. And the meaning you have given is also not right according to vishraam. Actually with the vishraam position, the pankti makes no sense.

    I think the meaning with this vishraam will be, Oh thee, I ask for Bhavani. Or Oh thee, Bhavani is my only plea. 

    11 hours ago, paapiman said:

    Please listen, Oh Power of Almighty God, the Havan has made a plea.

    Again, how can Havan make a plea? I think ਕੀ definitely means 'of'. 

    10 hours ago, paapiman said:

    ਪੁਕਾਰ also mean to complain

    Where did you get this? 

    10 hours ago, paapiman said:

    In the above arth, Bhavani can refer to Sri Aad Shatki or Durga Devi.

    With that vishraam, if we use Vaheguru as meaning of Bhavani, then meaning would be, Oh thee, I only ask for Vaheguru. Or it can be Oh thee, I only for ask for you.

    However, Bhavani is name so we can't put 'you'. With that, first meaning is correct but doesn't make sense. Just see,

    oh Paapiman, I only ask for Paapiman.

    Doesn't make sense right? 

    10 hours ago, paapiman said:

    ਕਾਰ can possibly refer to Kaal

    I think ਕਾਰ only means a deed or work or shape. Can you give any pankti or refer to mahankosh? 

    9 hours ago, paapiman said:

    ਭਵਾਨੀ also means "the one which brings wealth". 

    Maybe another Arth might be as follows:

     

    ਸੁਣਹੁ ਤੁਮ ਭਵਾਨੀ; ਹਮਨ ਕੀ ਪੁਕਾਰੇ ॥

    Listen Oh Sri Akaal Purakh jee, I have not complained about the coming of wealth.

     

    How's that bro?

     

    Bhul chuk maaf

    With that vishraam and pad chhed, I think meaning should be 

    Oh Akaal Purakh the giver of wealth, please listen to my plea.

    Here you haven't done pad chhed of ਹਮਨ so I have put it's meaning as 'me/mine' only.

    *******************************

    Nice Vichar ji

    Trimandeep Singh 

  6. 11 hours ago, paapiman said:

    In Punjabi, we might say "Dharti dee Pukaar". Similarly, that verse might be saying "Havan dee Pukaar".

    So, maybe the Arth might be as follows:

     

    ਸੁਣਹੁ ਤੁਮ ਭਵਾਨੀ; ਹਮਨ ਕੀ ਪੁਕਾਰੇ ॥

    Oh Bhavani (Sri Aad Shakti), listen to the call of the Havan.

     

    How's that bro?

     

    Bhul chuk maaf

    It would help if you find a pankti where ਕੀ means through. It will help in vichar.

    Trimandeep Singh 

  7. On 5/31/2021 at 12:04 PM, Kanika Thakur said:

    kya hum sukhmani sahib path kaam Krte hue bhi sun sakte hai Kya plz btaye Mujhe.... M recording sunti hu bcoz Mujhe language smjh nahi aati... Kya ye maana jayega. Baba ji ise swikar krenge... 

    If you don't know how to read Punjabi, no problem.

    Prefer to listen to Sukhmani Sahib in a quite place and listen it with concentration and love even if you don't understand a bit.

    Guru sahib (babaji) will surely accept it and bless you if you listen to Sukhmani sahib with love.

    In case you are busy and don't have time, then atleast don't miss it but listen to it while doing work as you wrote.

    Please forgive any mistakes 

    Trimandeep Singh 

  8. 1 hour ago, paapiman said:

    Daas might be wrong too, but IMHO, this might be ONE of the Arths of the above verses.

    ਸੁਣਹੁ ਤੁਮ ਭਵਾਨੀ ਹਮਨ - Please listen to me AKAAL SHAKTI.

    ਹਮਨ ਕੀ ਪੁਕਾਰੇ - My Plea through HAVAN..

    ਹਮਨ is used as a Dehli Deepak. In the first phrase, ਹਮਨ mean mine and in the second part, it means HAVAN.

    Therefore, the Arth might be as follows:

    Please listen to me, Oh Power of Almighty God, my Plea through HAVAN

    Shower your blessings on this servant.

     

    Bhul chuk maaf

     

    This is my opinion (not trying to prove yagya gurmat or not, but honest opinion)

    ਸੁਣਹੁ ਤੁਮ ਭਵਾਨੀ= Please listen oh Bhavani 

    ਹਮਨ ਕੀ ਪੁਕਾਰੇ

    ਕੀ ਪੁਕਾਰੇ means plea of. Whose pukaar? If you put meaning Havan then, oh Bhavani listen to plea OF Havan which doesn't make sense.

    Hence, ਹਮਨ needs to be a living person pleaing to someone. 

    Also, as per your arth, how does ਕੀ mean 'through'? As per your ਹਮਨ ਕੀ ਪੁਕਾਰੇ means plea through Havan but how does ਕੀ mean through? 

    Note: Veerji, speaking in polite tone.

    Trimandeep Singh 

  9. 1 hour ago, paapiman said:

    @Trimandeep Singh - You do believe in Paras Kala of Gurbani right?

    If yes, you should have no problem in believing that when Gurmat Havan is being done, the Agni is being affected by the Gurbani Mantars. Is that right?

     

    Bhul chuk maaf

     

    I believe in paras Kala. If we read bani near water, it becomes amrit, provided gurmukh is rehitvaan naam abhiyasi.

    If someone listens to Kirtan, it does have effect on him/her.

    In both acts, water around which bani was read is consumed and in the second one, amrit bani goes into our ears.

    In Havan, what role does the fire play? If you say while reading bani, it is going in our ears, then even in absence of fire, bani will go in our ears. 

    The role of fire hasn't been told by any of the people who support heaven.

    You did say that Agni Devta is postman of Vaheguru. But, still without him Vaheguru will listen to us. We don't need anyone to send our message to Vaheguru. Bani is itself a talk with Guru sahib.

    Note: Veerji, politely Keh reha haan.

    Trimandeep Singh 

  10. 28 minutes ago, paapiman said:

    ਭਵਾਨੀ has multiple meanings bro.

    In the below verses, ਭਵਾਨੀ refers to Sri Durga jee.

     

    ਅਨਹਦ ਰੂਪ ਅਨਾਹਦ ਬਾਨੀ ॥

    He is Limitless Entity and hath infinite celestial strain.

    ਚਰਨ ਸਰਨਿ ਜਿਹ ਬਸਤ ਭਵਾਨੀ ॥

    The goddess Durga takes refuge at His Feet and abides there.

     

    Bhul chuk maaf

    I was going to quote exact same pankti. : )

  11. ਸੁਣਹੁ ਤੁਮ ਭਵਾਨੀ ਹਮਨ ਕੀ ਪੁਕਾਰੇ ॥
    ਕਰਹੁ ਦਾਸ ਪਰ ਮਿਹਰ ਅਪਰੰ ਅਪਾਰੇ ॥

    ਸੁਣਹੁ= Please listen 

    ਭਵਾਨੀ= Durga Ji (At a deeper level, Vaheguru Ji only because he has described him in verses before this pankti and it is Vaheguru Ji who works through avatars)

    ਹਮਨ= Mine(ਸਾਡੀ)

    ਪੁਕਾਰੇ= plea 

    ਕਰਹੁ= please do

    ਅਪਰੰ ਅਪਾਰੇ= Beant kirpa 

     

    [Oh Bhavani (Vaheguru, creator of durga), please listen to my plea

    Shower your blessings on this servant.]

    *********************

    But again, these may be wrong. Beliefs also play a role in interpreting meanings. For me, Yagya is not gurmat. But Daas is pretty sure (no bias for Yagya but honest opinion), that 'Me' is right meaning of Haman in the pankti.(ਹੋਰ ਢੁਕਦਾ ਹੈ) 

    Differences in belief were also a reason behind conflicting meanings among Teekakars like Prof sahib singh, Gyani Harbans Singh, Nirmale scholars etc.

    Bhul chuk maaf

    Trimandeep Singh 

     

    image.png

  12. 43 minutes ago, paapiman said:

    @Trimandeep Singh - Daas has a question bro.

    According to Grammar, can the above verse be used to prove that Bhagat Raja Janak jee Maharaaj is the greatest Bhagat?

    ਭਗਤੁ ਵਡਾ - Does it mean "The Greatest Bhagat" or "A Great Bhagat"?

    ਤੁ - What does the Aunkarh at the feet of tAta indicate?

     

    Bhul chuk maaf

    1) Great Bhagat. Bhai Gurdaas Ji hasn't made any comparison in the Shabad so, it should be 'Great Bhagat' only. By 'Vadda Bhagat' I think he means that sometimes,  bhagats of Vaheguru too come under 5 vices but this Vadda Bhagat always remained free of maaya (meaning kept doing bhagti with faith).

    2) please can you quote pankti? 

    Bhul chuk maaf

    Trimandeep Singh 

  13. Humbly request you, please read the whole message before ignoring it right away.

    6 hours ago, hsingh6 said:

    If you recall, I have already conveyed to you the title of a very big gyani. However, that does not give you a blanket license to restate your positions,

    Obviously, Daas is not a gyani and neither do I want you to restate it ji. (sarcastically anyways)

     

    6 hours ago, hsingh6 said:

    All  I see  is debate and sticking to ones position

    Ji, Daas wasn't adamant to points given by others. You would have said that in case I ignored them and kept on giving my points only. Others respectfully replied to my views and I did the same. Disagreeing and differences in basic things (which lead to a long debate) doesn't mean I have been disrespectful. I think emotions can't be expressed on an online platform and maybe because of that you had an impression that I was being disrespectful. Daas tried to answer the counter points and by mistake, if I missed,it was not intentional. And I would be humbled if you quote the point, when I was being disrespectful towards others. I would be cautious the next time.

     

    6 hours ago, hsingh6 said:

    the hukamnamas from Gurbani that Guru Sahiban got from Akal Purakh after a lot bhakti and in response to a specific question or thought are bandied about in debates without context...just to prove ones own point.

    I have quoted mostly those panktis which have been used by Bhai Sahib Randhir Singh Ji himself. And meanings provided were not altered according to my Budh. Meanings were pasted directly. 

     

    6 hours ago, hsingh6 said:

    You have in the past agreed to do so but sadly have not implemented it.

    Yes, I commit that I said that I will not post anymore. But the person who was debating (Paapiman Ji) himself said that we were debating respectfully. So, when the other party is agreeing to debate then why do I stop presenting my views? This debate was more of a debate between two persons than many. So I think if both agree, then there's no harm to continue as long as opinions are being presented respectfully.

     

    6 hours ago, hsingh6 said:

    it..may I request you now once again with folded hands to take a break and start treating Gurbani with respect and not use it to score debating points.

    Bhai sahib, you don't need to fold your hands, please. I have not used Gurbani to score debating points. Gurbani not only has paras Kala but also gyaan which we used to support our views. The debate/vichar went long because of difference in basic views.

    Eg: we both agree that naam is essential for liberation. But then we discussed who gives naam. Finally when it was concluded Satguru gives naam, then Vichar was done on who is being referred to as Satguru. 

    This debate went long and Daas should have stopped right there when so many differences came up. But I realized this a little late and for that, Daas is responsible.

    ***********************

    Daas has reviewed the whole debate again, and I don't think I have been disrespectful but I would say, immature who kept on opening new sub topics before completing the previous one. Still, Daas assures you that respect for all people on this forum in my mind is the same as it was before debate and hope it is the same on the other side. (Please confirm this nahi taan Rehraas Sahib dhyaan naal nhi padha jaana)

    Daas asks maafi in case you feel Daas wasn't respectful. I have been reading forums but contributing to a thread was a new thing for me so maybe Daas doesn't know how to express views properly. Daas will keep your points in mind next time.

    Edit: @hsingh6 Kirpa kar deyo ji. Tussi guilt vich chhadta Daas nu. Mainu neend ni auni ji 😞

    ਮੋਹਿ ਰੈਣਿ ਨ ਵਿਹਾਵੈ ਨੀਦ ਨ ਆਵੈ ਬਿਨੁ ਦੇਖੇ ਗੁਰ ਦਰਬਾਰੇ ਜੀਉ ॥੩॥

    Trimandeep Singh 

     

  14. 5 minutes ago, paapiman said:

    The point is just because DDT and Nanaksar (both Puratan Sampradas) DON'T do Jhatka or follow the Sukha Maryada, we cannot reject these rituals in our Panth.

    Yes, you can be right here. This is possible.

     

    6 minutes ago, paapiman said:

    Some rituals are specific to certain Sampradas.

    They may be. But we need to judge if they are according to gurmat or not. Your points are convincing.

    So, conclusion is- Havan may be in line with Gurmat or maybe not. At the end, you have accepted it as Gurmat and I respectfully reject it (but respect those who do it).

    I think it was fun doing vichar on bani of Guru Gobind Singh Ji. 

    Thank you Paapiman Ji

    Trimandeep Singh 

     

  15. 3 hours ago, paapiman said:

    ਹਮਨ means HAVAN (please see below from Mahan Kosh). 

     

    ਹਮਨ - hamana - हमन
    ਦੇਖੋ, ਹਵਨ
     
    Bhul chuk maaf

    Bhai sahib, which mahan Kosh are you referring to? 

    In mahan Kosh, a third meaning, (ਅਸੀਂ, ਹਮ) is also mentioned which perfectly fits in the pankti you quoted. 

    And if we say, in that pankti ਹਮਨ means ਹਵਨ then use of word ਕੀ becomes irrelevant. 

    Trimandeep Singh 

×
×
  • Create New...