Amrit1972

Wah Ji Wah 'challange_anything' Ji. . Aje Taan Poora Sach Saamne Nahi Ayaa Te Tusi Dikhaana Shuroo Kar Ditta Ke Tusi Kee Ho! If you want to know the facts about 'Nihang history', you should wait for next updates on 'Nihangs' section of amritworld.com. If you cannot control your anger, then you must be silent. It will be useful to you. Now see, what you have written in anger. It showed your real face. No one is showing hatred for Nihangs or fake Nihangs. What we wanted to say is that at present they have no major role in Sikh affairs. It is the fact. Telling truth is not hatred. I repeat, 'showing sympathy for Monica Bedi is nothing but Shosha', 'Present self-proclaimed Nihangs are totally different to the historic Nihangs', 'present self-proclaimed Nihangs have NO role in present Sikh affairs'. And, Eh Giddarh-Bhabhaki Kise Hor Nu Dena. We are saying what is truth. We are never afraid of such people who do not know how to have a decent debate.

I got an email which says that Nihangs are popular even on my website amritworld.

http://www.rss.org/New_RSS/index.jsp

Abu Salem is a criminal. Monika Bedi is a criminal. Both of them should be punished. That is all. Nihangs' statement is nothing but a 'Shosha', so should be ignored. Here in India, no one takes them seriously. They are popular only on net, especially on websites related to AKJ.

I have not given this story in my previous posts on this thread. Present socalled Balmiki community does not want to hear this story. See what happened to Chatar Singh Jeevan Singh publishers of Amritsar Sahib. Even then, truth is truth. Well, I can see the future. The RSS will be a very small 'danger' in front of another 'danger', which is coming very swiftly.

The second Valimiki Ji was another religious person. He was from so-called low-caste. Today, people think that Maharishi Valimiki Ji of Ramayan and the second Valimiki Ji were same person, but it is a big mistake. (See: Mahan Kosh).

There were two Rishi Valmiki. The famous Maharishi Valmiki Ji was a Guru, living in his Ashram in a forest. When Sri Ram went to Vanvaas, he met Maharishi Valmiki Ji. Both met again when Lav and Kush fought Sri Ram and his army. Maharishi Valimiki gave shelter to Mother Sita. It was Maharishi's Ashram, where mighty Lav and Kush were born. See 'Ram Avtar' in Sri Dasam Granth Sahib Ji. Ram Charit Manas mentions Maharishi Valmiki meeting Sri Ram. The original story, which was sung by Lav and Kush, was written by Maharishi Valimiki. It is a classic epic written in Sanskrit. Later, it seems, a few changes were made in this great book. Maharishi Valmiki's name is mentioned in Sri Dasam Granth's Brahma Avtar.

And what about Navjot Sandhu? She too needs help from our Nihang warriors. Where were these warriors, when Darshan Kaur needed security in Delhi court?

Can we download this video? Vijaydeep Singh Ji, have you watched this video? What is in it?

Bilkul, it is not any 'pichhali' baby.

I have quoted original line by Ratan Singh Bhangu, where 'Baaban Badd Ansi' term is used. On other pages Ratan Singh bhangu calls him Banauj singh. Other writers, like Giani gian singh calls him Binod Singh. So, Banauj Singh and Binod Singh is same person. Kesar singh Chibbar does not mention that Binod singh and Kahan Singh came to Punjab along with Baba Banda Singh Bahadur Ji. In both Gur bilas, and Sri Gur Sobha, we do not hear any Sakhi where Binod singh or Kahan singh are involved. Mahama Prakash says that they were sent by Guru Ji with Baba Banda singh Ji. I believe that they were not sent by Guru Ji. They joined Baba Banda Singh Ji only when he was preparing to attack the city of Sirhind. Had they been sent by Guru Ji, Kesar singh would have mentioned this. He tells that Bhai Baaj singh Ji etc came along with Baba Banda singh Ji. He does not say if Binod singh or Kahan singh accompanied him. Nawab Kapur singh was still a humble sevadar, not a leader, when he was given the title of Nawab. It was the first time, when he was choosen as a leader. Kesar Singh has appreciated Nawab Kapur singh. Nawab Kapur Singh is, thus, the founder of Budhha Dal, not Bhai Budhha Ji. Bawa is used with their names as a 'gotra' or something like that. :wink: .

There is a lot of controversy over this. It is rather a political stunt, it seems. Congress is behind this show and our Akali brothers are jealous.

I am just a humble servant of the Panth. It does not hurt me if any Sikh makes such a comment for me. I am happy with Nihang Gajjan Singh. He has the right to say what he wants to. I am just enjoying his post. Let us go further with Nihang Gajjan Singh's post : - Amrit Pal Singh 'Amrit' is a 'Ganja'. He has no hair on his head. He does not wear Kachhehra. He puts black Tilak on his forehead. Here is the EVIDENCE: -

Amritworld site is funny. . It is doing nothing but raising controversies. Lagda hai ke Amrit Pal Singh de din poore ho gye han. Well, Nihang Gajjan Singh Ji is great. If Amrit Pal Singh 'Amrit' is seen with AKJ people, he must be a member of AKJ. Here in this picture, he is seen with 'Singh Sabha' management. So, Amrit Pal Singh 'Amrit' is a 'Singh sabhia' : -

http://www.sikhsangat.com/index.php?showto...14794&st=24

http://www.sikhsangat.com/index.php?showto...14794&st=24

Dear 'Singh132' Ji, thank you for the link. I am confused a little bit if you are Balpreet Singh Ji himself or not. If you are Balpreet Singh Ji, then I can address you (Singh132), otherwise I will have to address someone else who is not on this forum. Well, I have read the posts on that link. Before we start discussions, I would suggest Balpreet Singh Ji to read my pages again. Also, it will be good if they read 'Guru Keeyaan Saakhiyaan' again. Bhai Sukha Singh Ji mentions red colour, though Rahatnamas are against it. I have studied 'Rahatnama Bhai Chaupa Singh Ji'. My study on this Rahatnama is presented on amrotworld.com. Bhai Chaupa Singh's rahatnama is against red colour. I have quoted Gurbani and other Rahatnamas in a footnote in my study. Please have a look. I do know that red dress is prohibited in Rahatnamas. We will discuss these points in this thread, but again, I request you to read my pages again.

I have just started to make comments. First three pages indicate where I am going to. Though, I do not prefer pictures, I will be providing them as well, wherever required. Amritworld.com has more than 200 new pictures, which are never shown to anyone. I will add more pictures in Nihang section.

Thank you very much, brother.

Sri Gur Sobha by Poet Sainapati is one of my favourite books on Guru history. 'Ashtavakra Geeta', 'Yoga Sutra' are favourite books on mysticism. In Punjabi, I love poetry books. My favourite poets are Bhai Veer Singh, Pooran Singh and Prof. Mohan Singh. All the poetry books by them are my favourite. In days of my 'javaani' , I loved poetry by Shiv Kumar Batalvi. I still love his poetry, but now I do not read them repeatidly as I read other books. When I was in college, I memorised his whole book of 'Peerhaan Da Paraaga'. I was then 'Munda-Khunda'.

I have quoted OLD texts, where blue dress or 'Neelambar' is mentioned. For example, I quoted 'Gur Bilas Patshahi 10' (Sukha Singh) (See: - http://www.amritworld.com/nihangs/gurugobindsingh.html), which says: - Neelaambar Kutka Kar Dhaare. It Ut Moh Khalsa Maare. I have quoted even Bhai Sahib Gurdas Ji, where he said that Guru Nanak Dev Ji wore blue dress: - http://www.amritworld.com/nihangs/bluedress.html I prefered only Puraatan texts in this regard, and there is no evidence, I think, to prove that poems by Bhai Gurdas 2 are as puraatan as other texts I quoted. If you provide me evidence that Bhai Gurdas 2's poems are really 'puraatan' source, I am ready to add them in next update with my explanations. Possibly, you have not read whole of 'Vaar' of Bhai Gurdas second. Any puraatan text would hardly make such statements. The quote you provided goes like this: - Iyoon Upje Singh Bhujhangeeye Neelambar Dhaara.

It will take much time to write about Pran Sangli, because the text published by the University is a long one. I once saw an old copy of Pran Sangli, which was just a small book. Presently, I am busy with my other projects for my website, so it is not possible for me to write on this topic in near. Personally, I think there is nothing serious in Pran Sangli. I have studied original Sanskrit texts, like 'Yoga Sutra' written by Maharishi Patanjali Ji and 'Ashtavakra Geeta'. Bhagvat Geeta is another valuable Sanskrit text. I do not understand, why Pran Sangli was written. It has nothing to do with real 'Yog'.

Perhaps Pandit Hardyal traslated the Pran Sangli, or it is a different book. I have a copy of Pran Sangli published by Punjabi University, Patiala.

Guru Nanak Dev Ji married Mother Sulakhani Ji. It was his only marriage. He never married any Muslim woman. It was just an accusation by Janamsakhi Bala, which was written/modified by Hindaalis' chief, who himself was living with a Muslim woman. Thus, to save himself from criticism, he wrote in Janamsakhi Bala that even Guru Nanak Dev Ji married a Muslim woman. He wanted to say that if Guru Nanak Dev could marry a Muslim woman, there was nothing wrong if he (Hindali chief) married a Muslim woman. In fact, Guru Nanak Dev Ji was married to Mother Sulakhani Ji and it was his only marriage.