Jump to content

ekta

Members
  • Posts

    36
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ekta

  1. Of course I don't have time for discussion online. Why do you think I didn't make a long post to reply to Vijaydeep and made that short one. If you search the SPN forum, I used to have long debates with Vijaydeep. I had time during those times because I was a University student so made psots while in class.

    Situation isn't the same now. I got things to work on so I don't have to talk about shenanigans of Dasam Granth promoters. If you or Vijaydeep got game, bring it to Toronto. I do make random posts but don't engage in debate.

    I've noticed before that you did engage in debate on this forum, then when it got too hot for you you disappeared. What's the point of debating when you don't engage in debate? Perhaps you're hoping people will simply get tired and stop rebutting your points?

    It is a simple matter of civility for you to respond to those who respond to your posts considering that you're the one who attacked their beliefs to begin with.

  2. Quote "The power of bani is limitless and trying to tie it up to suit ones own motives can only be the work of the shiromani moorakh."

    Whom will you put on the top of the shiromani moorakh list if the technique suggested by Baabaa Hari Singh Jee is completely against that what the true Gurus say?

    Balbir Singh

    Please provide proof. It is easy to criticize. Back up your implied assertion using Gurbani.

  3. Pray Truth for all and say Satsriakaal!

    Dear all and Shaheediyan Jee!

    The reverend Gurus are today also giving the message of Naam Jap.

    Please contemplate. Guru Amardaas Jee is singing.

    ਕਿਸੁ ਹਉ ਸੇਵੀ ਕਿਆ ਜਪੁ ਕਰੀ ਸਤਗੁਰ ਪੂਛਉ ਜਾਇ ॥

    किसु हउ सेवी किआ जपु करी सतगुर पूछउ जाइ ॥

    kisu hau sayvee kiaa japu karee satgur poochhao jaai. SGGS Ang 34

    Your reverend preachers also you are but suggesting to read such messages repeatedly. And Naam Jap is done. Why?

    Please click the attachment and listen.

    Balbir Singh

    Balbir Singh, request that you provide proof for the assertions made in the recording you attached in a NEW thread. Please try and keep this one on topic.

  4. As stated by the admin in a previous post, discussion on Chritropakhyan must take place in the appropriate thread. A number of posts from both sides have been deleted. Next time, maybe warnings will be given.

    Also, one liner nindya against Dasam Granth Sahib ji's bani will not be tolerated. You must back up your points with logic. You must also express your point in an appropriate civil manner. Even if you disagree with Chritropakhyan, Chaubis Avtar, Bachittar Natak, or whatever other composition, if you write against it, be aware of how you express your opinion.

    WE allow freedom of opinion on this issue here, but the manner of expressing one's opinion is not up for debate.

  5. N30 Singh,

    Guru Fateh.

    I would like to know why all my posts are missing in this thread? This is sheer discrimination, not a Sikhi way. Is this the way you moderate in this forum while let people QUOTE my posts and you delete mine?

    Sikhi is not practiced like this.

    I hope you respond to this post rather than deleting it.

    Regards

    Tejwant Singh

    A large number of off topic posts from multiple users were moved from various threads to the only five vs randip singh thread by myself. The sheer number of off topic posts and back and forth argumentation was (and once again is) ridiculous. There are currently 8 or 9 new completely off topic back and forth argument posts added since I last logged in, less than 12 hours ago. This is nuts, so I've decided to simply delete the tu tu mein mein style posts unless posted in that one thread.

    When people have an opinion backed up by evidence or an argument (on topic), I never delete the post.

    Just a general note, Any further posts of this nature from the posters involved in this will result in official warnings and eventually a ban if they don't stop.

  6. This thread is now peoples personal battleground to deal with whatever issues you wish to deal with (should you choose to participate in this thread). Any more off topic back and forth in other threads will result in deletion of the post and official warnings. Repeated off topic will result in a ban from the forum for a few weeks so people can cool off. Try to cool it with the slander.

  7. That really is out of order. Come on Admin, I for one want to see all the facts, and please cut the nasty bile ridden comments out from certain people here. Lets debate the issues and not the people, and find some common ground.

    I assure you that only violations of forum rules were moderated from his posts. Absolutely 100% of his argument made it through, never have we removed anybody's argument to back up an opinion of thier's, or any evidence that they might have presented.

  8. Here is one of his posts on another thread:

    My opinion: Anything falling outside the boundaries of Guru Granth Sahib ji isn't Gurbani. Doesn't matter if it states who it is printed by or how ink is to be prepared or even quote such as Jit Dar Lakh Mohammadaa, Lakhaa Bissan Mahesh.

    Thanks for the clarification on your stand. So you are saying Jaap Sahib is not bani than either?

    Do you at least accept that there are important elements of Sikhi contained in writings outside the SGGS such as in Dasam Granth, Bhai Gurdass ji's Vaars, Bhai Nand Lal ji's writings, and in the rahitnamas?? If so, which writings do you accept in whole, which in part only, and which do you reject entirely?

  9. The Khalsa Fauj, if you are going to reference something to back up your point you are required to provide at least an analysis (or link to a proper analysis). Your opinion without some sort of evidence or logical framework to back it up is not good enough here. Next time such things will be deleted without warning.

    Moderators have been extremely tolerant of you so far, but I think it is time to enforce rules more strictly for you b/c of your spam, off topic posts, and opinions which are merely attacks with no reasoning or evidence behind them.

×
×
  • Create New...