paapiman Posted April 12, 2015 Report Share Posted April 12, 2015 (edited) a) This bachan is not precedence. b.) This bachan has a context, without proper context its highly foolish to believe this as this bachchan is circumstantial. Bro, I do agree with you that this sakhi is circumstantial. Almost all Sakhis can be considered to be circumstantial, but we should try to learn from them as much as we can. Like for example, in the case of Bhoomiya robber, Satguru jee did not prohibit him from stealing, but rather gave him three other bachans. This is circumstantial too, but we can learn a lot from it. Satguru jee used psychology to change his ways as he was a hardcore robber. This sakhi reinforces the belief that women should look upon their husbands (especially Gursikhs ones) as lords and serve them. Correct me, if I am wrong. Waheguru jee kaa Khalsa Waheguru jee kee Fateh Edited April 17, 2015 by paapiman 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paapiman Posted April 12, 2015 Author Report Share Posted April 12, 2015 (edited) The sakhi is pasted below. *Srimaan Sant Baba Nand Singh jee Maharaaj once told some women that there is no need for them to come to him. It would be enough for them to serve their husbands.* [1] [1] - Sri Nanaksar Stairs to God Waheguru jee kaa Khalsa Waheguru jee kee Fateh Edited April 12, 2015 by paapiman 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.