paapiman Posted March 24, 2018 Report Share Posted March 24, 2018 Four Canadian Sikhs had tried to assassinate Malkiat Sidhu in 1987. Does anyone know why was he (Sidhu) targeted? Was he a traitor? Was he involved in human right violations? For more info, please see below. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malkiat_Singh_Sidhu Bhul chuk maaf 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sarabatam Posted March 24, 2018 Report Share Posted March 24, 2018 Good question , love to get more details on this. Mind you, jaspal atval was also accused of beating of ujjal dosanjh. We as peaceful sikhs should condemn both incidents, they also seems highly suspicious play right into hands of RAW, intelligence agencies to discredit any kind of peaceful separatist movement. Ever wonder why peaceful separatist movement are so difficult to penetrate? Because they are peaceful, public opinion cannot be swayed, as soon as there is violence, boom public opinion are divided, it looses credibility. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paapiman Posted March 25, 2018 Author Report Share Posted March 25, 2018 16 hours ago, sarabatam said: Good question , love to get more details on this. Mind you, jaspal atval was also accused of beating of ujjal dosanjh. We as peaceful sikhs should condemn both incidents, they also seems highly suspicious play right into hands of RAW, intelligence agencies to discredit any kind of peaceful separatist movement. Beating of Ujjal Dosanjh was against Sikh principles, but we need to get more details on Malkiat Sidhu's character before making that call. If he was a tyrant, then the attempt on his life will conform to Gurmat. Additionally, Malkiat Sidhu was later assassinated by Sikh revolutionaries in India. There must be a reason behind it. Bhul chuk maaf 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sarabatam Posted March 25, 2018 Report Share Posted March 25, 2018 14 hours ago, paapiman said: Beating of Ujjal Dosanjh was against Sikh principles, but we need to get more details on Malkiat Sidhu's character before making that call. If he was a tyrant, then the attempt on his life will conform to Gurmat. Additionally, Malkiat Sidhu was later assassinated by Sikh revolutionaries in India. There must be a reason behind it. Bhul chuk maaf Whatever the reasons are, I think these points below should trumph any justifications: 1. If there is violent declaration of wars on sikhs in india by state sponsor terrorism, it should be dealt with resistance in india against state sponsor terrorism 2. Coming to foreign country in this case- canada, using it services an anchor or base to wage violence war against india its not only wrong on so many levels- respecting laws of this country but its illegal. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sarabatam Posted March 25, 2018 Report Share Posted March 25, 2018 Diplomatic pressure, influencing media narrative, going through UN- human right abuses all these peaceful resistance should have been enough. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paapiman Posted March 25, 2018 Author Report Share Posted March 25, 2018 As Canadians, we must respect the laws of our country, but we should not forget Sikh ethics and values too, which includes picking up arms, when all peaceful means have exhausted. Bhul chuk maaf 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sarabatam Posted March 25, 2018 Report Share Posted March 25, 2018 21 minutes ago, paapiman said: As Canadians, we must respect the laws of our country, but we should not forget Sikh ethics and values too, which includes picking up arms, when all peaceful means have exhausted. Bhul chuk maaf What peaceful or legal means was used against sidhu here in context within candaian judical system? Let me answer that for you: NONE 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sarabatam Posted March 25, 2018 Report Share Posted March 25, 2018 Don't under mine peaceful means it was same peaceful means Sikhs for justice used in states that got modi visa revoked and black listed in USA before he became pm of India 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.