Amandeep Hindustani

Its funny all those you things you cite also apply to your as well. I mean how did a mere 50,000 Hindu troops just take over a state filled with millions of warriors.

Because I remember the speeches coming from the loudspeakers during his day. The utter poison he was putting into his communities mind at the behest of Pakistan was disgusting.

We never denied that we or certain segments of our population made alliances with known enemies of the country for their own benefit. It happens even today. Then again we don't portray ourselves, like you, as people who did everything for this civilization, did nothing wrong etc.. Traitorous actions are not just part of the christians, muslims, hindus and others. But part and parcel of the sikh community as well.

I still despise him.

I disagree. You sided with the British because they gave you goodies. Your history is full of changing sides. Moghuls Rajputs Marathas Moghuls again.. British French India Pakistan India again.. Pakistan again.. Am I missing anybody?

For those that are proposing the division of Punjab from India - what make you think punjab itself cannot be divided by district, pind and city?

Are you the same that sided with the British?

Modi cracks the whip, SAD goes running. http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/punjabs-drug-crackdown/ Having suffered election setbacks that have been linked to the drug problem in Punjab, a major issue during the polls, the ruling SAD-BJP has launched a crackdown. A special police drive, started immediately after the election results, has led to the arrest of 3,353 persons in just 15 days and registration of 3,000 cases against them. The government has also dismissed 25 station house officers from the police for suspected links with drug racketeers. “We are working on identifying the black sheep within the police who are involved with drug smugglers. No one will be spared,” said Deputy Chief Minister Sukhbir Singh Badal. The names of those dismissed haven’t been made public yet. Sources in the deputy CM’s office hinted more are in the firing line. Outside the force, the target of the crackdown has been street operators and peddlers who deal in small quantities. Not much has been seized but police say the crackdown is essential to wipe the supply chain out. “The supply of heroin is almost finished in Punjab. White powder is not available in the market either,” said a top officer. The government is hoping the break in supply will bring drug addicts to de-addiction centres. Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal on Tuesday reviewed the de-addiction facilities available and was reportedly told by health authorities that there is enough room. The opposition has called the drive “thoughtless” with small operators picked up at random. Sukhbir, who also handles Home, said, “The solution lies not only in picking up peddlers and filling jails. The problem is multifaceted and requires a solution at several levels.” He has asked three IGs to prepare a comprehensive plan at various levels. “The next step will be taken only once when their report is with us next week,” Sukhbir said. Sukhbir, also the SAD president, saw the party’s vote share drop 12 lakh in an election centred around the easy availability of drugs and the alleged links of politicians to these rackets. The opposition had targeted Sukhbir’s brother-in-law Bikram Singh Majithia for alleged links to drug smugglers, and the SAD spent much of its campaign defending him. to help us personalise your reading experience. Majithia was named by international racketeer Jagdish Bhola in a statement to the enforcement directorate. Though Bhola was arrested by the Punjab police, the ED got into the case to investigate hawala transactions. Bhola also named Damanvir Singh, son of then jails minister Sarwan Singh Phillaur, as being involved in the racket. Just after the election results, the CM removed Phillaur. During the two months the election code of conduct was in effect, Election Commission teams and the Punjab police recovered more drugs than from any other state. From March 5 to May 1, the police recovered drugs worth Rs 780 crore while the EC’s static surveillance teams recovered 426 kg drugs worth Rs 1.90 crore and its flying squads 767 kg worth Rs

We consider Indira Gandhi, a politician with multiple faults which has been discussed again and again over the years. But we don't put up pictures of her in our temples, sing songs about her, or hold melas in her honour like some-people do in relation to a certain "Sant" And what democratic values are you talking about? You wanted to overthrow a largely democratic state to set up a theocratic state. And now you are trying to use the democratic process in India and abroad to set up your magical kingdom in which everybody is equal, no violence, crime, unhappiness, lots of food, equal say and deer eat from your hand as you walk the street.

The paki was impressed by the indian election but depressed by the way Modi treated Nawaz Shariff like a "schoolboy" - not my words. Please read Imran Khans latest statement. I wonder what Tony Sahib has to say about the alleged vote rigging during George Bush Jrs time, corruption, backroom deals, infighting no less vicious then in India.

Here is pakjabis surrendering en masse in 71 live and in colour. It starts at 1:44 and you seem them bowing and laying down their weapons. Here are your pakjabis surrendering again in 1999 with white flag. And here are pakjabis, captured in war, crying because they want to go home. "Sahib, I'm from lahore and I have 6 biwis and 40 children, sahib" I would like your comments unless you are going evade, ignore as usual. Tx

I guess you had trouble reading my hypothetical situation situation in response to another hypothetical situation. And your comments are coming from a guy who's country accepts baksheesh from the United States that allows them to bomb your civilians repeatedly, or your comments are from a guy who's community is quite famous even the west for stabbing each other with kirpans during elections in your religious institutions. As for the Indian election, it has been largely peaceful. Stray incidents of violence do not necessarily mean the entire process is bad. The Election Commission of India did a fantastic job based on the circumstances. The West understand the constraints, situation and size of the election hence the congratulatory notes. The situation with Bangladesh was minor. But when the much stronger pakjabis pushed the line they got a mouthful. As Nawaz Shariff admits thousands of Pakistani soldiers were killed by the IA - entire regiments wiped out. Crimes in the open happen in the United States and the rest of the world as well. Take a gander below. Now, youtube may be against islam and users may get hellfire, wrath of Allah but I urge to take a look anyways. The year is 2011. A group of white teens decide to run over every black person they see on the road. Pretty open and without fear of the consequences.

Ask your muslim brothers to try it.

Just watched some news on a guy in the United States who abducted, raped, 2-3 girls for at least 15 years. the poor girls were abducted when young but were kept in his basement in a dungeon. Raped, forced abortions, beatings, threats. And that news is coming from the most civilized industrialized nation in the world.

The demand for the ban on loudspeakers is from a fringe group, and does not necessarily mean most of hindu society is fighting for it. These are small things that Modi needs to stay away from.

And I do not care about AAP. The top leadership has resigned (gopinath, ilzami and now Yogendra Yadav) and Kejriwal admits today that there is no chance he will gain power again. Done. Flop. Fail.

Hmm...nice theory. Here is another one since we are talking hypothetically. India is attacked by China, Pakistan and Bangladesh together. India take the opportunity to nuke bangladesh leaving only Pakistan and China. Japan, Israel, Vietnam, Phillipines come to the aid of a friendly india by opening up other fronts. Russia, always suspicious of China, helps India as well. Meanwhile, the Iranians seizing the opportunity take western shia dominated pakistan. The West, led by America side with democratic india rather than the commie, islamist combine. And you get nothing. How does that sound? Is Pakistan's support going to be like in the 80s when they threw you under the bus because of one threat from Indira Gandhi? Be thankful that patriotic hindus and sikhs are dying on the borders and fighting the islamist pigs. If these islamist dogs were right on the border with Amritsar you would not even have a chance without the IA. And spare me the "we are lions" retort, please. When fighters from across the world pour into Amristar, armed, ready to destroy everything you will think again. BTW, I heard that there has been multiple terror attacks in china by the moslems, and the chinese government are in a panic. Looks like the chickens are coming home to roost.

Your words don't match your neet. As a Sikh you want China and Pakistan to attack India jointly. The reason? You want to weaken the country so you can get Khalistan. Which shows me that you have no faith in yourself or your own community to get it for yourselves. You want others to do the work so you can reap the rewards. Fortunately, most sikhs are not as traitorous as you. The Khalsa Raaj was great indeed but then again another regional power (maharashtrians) created a much bigger, stronger and longer lasting empire that spanned from South India to Attock. Before that the Guptas, Nandas, Maurayans, Rajputs, Jaats, Cholas and even the Dogras. What makes your 50 years special? The computer thing is a laugh. It does not even matter anymore. Continue...we have bigger plans. And please send me the youtube video of your "meeting" Take a gander at the news lately as well. This is not 47. The top everything from the subcontinent are Hindu. The Hindu when given an opportunity at business or education takes it and runs with it. Hence, why the sikhs and moslems hate the bania because they own everything including their (sikhs and moslems) lands and homes. Hell, even the spelling bees are being dominated by the Hindu LOL Mr. Obama will be sending Nisha Desai, Assistant Secretary (you guessed it a Hindu) to India in the next week to smooth out relations. http://www.businessinsider.com/sriram-hathwar-and-ansun-sujoe-win-the-spelling-bee-2014-5

The Taliban or (admin cut- lets not stereotype) in general will kill his own mother, slit her throat with his own hands for a few bucks. They can be easily bought and sold so we have to use this to our advantage. This is not only about Jehad, although that is the cover used. The drug and gun trade that makes afghan warlords billions is what this is about.

I think the general unease amongst sikhs and moslems in regards to Modi belittles an insecurity about Hinduism. The fear of being dominated. This led to Pakistan and the call for Khalistan. We know the moslem and sikh cannot compete with the Hindu in business, politics, academia, or any other sphere. This is true in India and abroad. The moslem or sikh will never give out statistics or compare himself to Hindus in the above fields because they have no chance. The last great myth was "1 Pakistani is worth 1000 hindus" or "1 Sikh is worth 38 Hindus" but that is slowly starting to fade as well. The ironic thing is the smashing was done by a bamani, gujju and bihari in the last 30-40 years. Generally, considered by moslems and sikhs as the most effeminate and weakest of the hindus. I remember in high school a moslem gang with their pakistani leader were harassing, bullying hindus and sikhs until a tough gujju came out of nowhere and smashed their leader. The shock and look on their faces was funny. Soon, they were saying all religions are the same and we should not fight. The fear is that the hindus have put 2 and 2 together or are close. And we are standing still. The insecurity stems from this fact. But anybody that has read indian history would know it was just a matter of time. Modi will create a stable government because he has an absolute majority, experience, worldwide contacts and takes no crap. If the work is not done you are out. The governments have already dealt with him for the last 12 years and know him well. Hence, the optimism. As for "picking fight" he has not except when the moslems burned pilgrims. The Pakistanis are a different story. We know terrorism will not stop so why not return the favour and that is exactly what is going to happen. In the 90s and 2000s it was Togadia and his VHP, Bajrang Dal that called the shots in Gujarat. They terrorized the moslems. Upon a complaint from moslems Modi effectively put them out of business. You do not hear much from them anymore except on youtube videos. Togadia made the mistake of publicly criticizing Modi for destroying 118 hindu temples. They are not on talking terms.

The Indian side needs to give more money to factions within the Pakistan Taliban to attack Paki forces. Remember, the Pakistan Taliban were created because of the assault on the Lal Masjid which outraged the fanatics. Basically, a Pakistani version of Operation Bluestar. Whether it was orchestrated by the Indian side I don't know but definitely the pakistani side has their opinion.

A hostile Iran hates Sunni dominated Pakistan. Much of violence in Pakistan is done by Iran. Also, If rumour is true then Japan will formally give up its pacifist ways in the next couple of months with an amendment to their constitution. Allowing them to finally re-arm themselves for the first time since World War 2. The Singh Rai's of Japan (Samurai) are coming back.

BTW, the PM of Pakistan Mr. Zaid Hamid said that Pakistan only has 6 months until annihilation. This much fear? And the man hasn't even done anything.....yet..hehe. Here is a great article from the chinese mouthpiece - the PRC. 6 Wars that China will fight in the next 50 years. It clearly says that India is one of the few countries against which China will face losses, instead of direct confrontation China needs to incite rebellion. Highlighted below. hina is not yet a unified great power. This is a humiliation to the Chinese people, a shame to the children of the Yellow Emperor. For the sake of national unification and dignity, China has to fight six wars in the coming fifty years. Some are regional wars; the others may be total wars. No matter what is the nature, each one of them is inevitable for Chinese unification. The 1st War: Unification of Taiwan (Year 2020 to 2025) Though we are enjoying peace on the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, we should not daydream a resolution of peaceful unification from Taiwan administration (no matter it is Chinese Nationalist Party or Democratic Progressive Party). Peaceful unification does not fit their interests while running for elections. Their stance is therefore to keep to status quo (which is favourable to the both parties, each of them can get more bargaining chips) For Taiwan, “independence” is just a mouth talk than a formal declaration, while “unification” is just an issue for negotiation than for real action. The current situation of Taiwan is the source of anxiety to China, since everyone can take the chance to bargain more from China. China must work out a strategy to unify Taiwan within the next ten years, that is, by 2020. China must work out a strategy to unify Taiwan within the next ten years, that is, by 2020. By then, China will have to send an ultimatum to Taiwan, demanding the Taiwanese to choose the resolution of peaceful unification (the most preferred epilogue for the Chinese) or war (an option forced to be so) by 2025. For the purpose of unification, China has to make preparation three to five years earlier. So when the time comes, the Chinese government must act on either option, to give a final answer to the problem. From the analysis of the current situation, Taiwan is expected to be defiant towards unification, so military action will be the only solution. This war of unification will be the first war under the sense of modern warfare since the establishment of the “New China”. This war will be a test to the development of the People’s Liberation Army in modern warfare. China may win this war easily, or it may turn out to be a difficult one. All depend on the level of intervention of the U.S. and Japan. If the U.S. and Japan play active roles in aiding Taiwan, or even make offensives into Chinese mainland, the war must become a difficult and prolonged total war. On the other hand, if the U.S. and Japan just watch and see, the Chinese army can easily defeat the Taiwanese. In this case, Taiwan can be under control within three months. Even if the U.S. and Japan step in in this stage, the war can be finished within six months. The 2nd War: “Reconquest” of Spratly Islands (Year 2025 to 2030) After unification of Taiwan, China will take a rest for two years. During the period of recovery, China will send the ultimatum to countries surrounding the Islands with the deadline of 2028. The countries having disputes on the sovereignty of Islands can negotiate with China on preserving their shares of investments in these Islands by giving up their territorial claims. If not, once China declares war on them, their investments and economic benefits will be taken over by China. At this moment, the South East Asian countries are already shivering with Chinese military unification of Taiwan. At this moment, the South East Asian countries are already shivering with Chinese military unification of Taiwan. On one hand, they will be sitting by the negotiation table, yet they are reluctant to give up their interests in the Islands. Therefore, they will be taking the wait-and-see attitude and keep delaying to make final decision. They will not decide whether to make peace or go into war until China takes any firm actions. The map below shows the situation of territorial claims over the Spratly Islands. (Map omitted) Besides, the U.S. will not just sit and watch China “reconquesting” the Islands. In the 1stwar mentioned above, the U.S. may be too late to join the war, or simply unable to stop China from reunifying Taiwan. This should be enough to teach the U.S. a lesson not to confront too openly with China. Still, the U.S. will aid those South East Asian countries, such as Vietnam and the Philippines, under the table. Among the countries surrounding the South China Sea, only Vietnam and the Philippines dare to challenge China’s domination. Still, they will think twice before going into war with China, unless they fail on the negotiation table, and are sure they can gain military support from the U.S. The best option for China is to attack Vietnam, since Vietnam is the most powerful country in the region. Beating Vietnam can intimidate the rest. While the war with Vietnam goes on, other countries will not move. If Vietnam loses, others will hand their islands back to China. If the opposite, they will declare war on China. Of course, China will beat Vietnam and take over all the islands. When Vietnam loses the war and its islands, others countries, intimidated by Chinese military power, yet still with greediness to keep their interests, will negotiate with China, returning the islands and declaring allegiance to China. So China can build the ports and place troops on these islands, extending its influence into the Pacific Ocean. Up till now, China has made a thorough breakthrough of the First Island Chain and infiltrated the Second one, Chinese aircraft carrier can have free access into the Pacific Ocean, safeguarding its own interests. The 3rd War: “Reconquest” of Southern Tibet (Year 2035 to 2040) China and India share a long border, but the only sparking point of conflicts between the two countries is only the part of Southern Tibet. China has long been the imaginary enemy of India. The military objective of India is to surpass China. India aims to achieve this by self-development and importing advanced military technologies and weapons from the U.S, Russia and Europe, chasing closely to China in its economic and military development. In India, the official and media attitude is more friendly towards the U.S, Russia and Europe, and is repellent or even hostile against China. This leads to unresolvable conflicts with China. On the other hand, India values itself highly with the aids from the U.S, Russia and Europe, thinking it can beat China in wars. This is also the reason of long lasting land disputes. In my opinion, the best strategy for China is to incite the disintegration of India. By dividing into several countries, India will have no power to cope with China. Twenty years later, although India will lag behind more compared to China in military power, yet it is still one of the few world powers. If China uses military force to conquer Southern Tibet, it has to bear some losses. In my opinion, the best strategy for China is to incite the disintegration of India. By dividing into several countries, India will have no power to cope with China. Of course, such plan may fail. But China should at least try its best to incite Assam province and once conquered Sikkim to gain independence, in order to weaken the power of India. This is the best strategy. The second best plan is to export advanced weapons to Pakistan, helping Pakistan to conquer Southern Kashmir region in 2035 and to achieve its unification. While India and Pakistan are busy fighting against each other, China should take a Blitz to conquer Southern Tibet, at the time occupied by India. India will not be able to fight a two front war, and is deemed to lose both. China can retake Southern Tibet easily, while Pakistan can control the whole Kashmir. If this plan cannot be adopted, the worst case is direct military action to take back Southern Tibet. After the first two wars, China has rested for around ten years, and has become a world power both in terms of military and economy. There will only be the U.S. and Europe (on the condition that it becomes a united country. If not, this will be replaced by Russia. But from my point of view, European integration is quite probable) able to cope with China in the top three list in world power. After taking back Taiwan and Spratly Islands, China has great leap forward in its military power in army, navy, air force and space warfare. China will be on the leading role in its military power, may be only second to the U.S. Therefore, India will lose this war. The 4th War: “Reconquest” of Diaoyu Island [senkaku] and Ryukyu Islands (Year 2040 to 2045) In the mid-21st century, China emerges as the real world power, accompanied with the decline of Japan and Russia, stagnant U.S. and India and the rise of Central Europe. That will be the best time for China to take back Diaoyu Island and Ryukyu Islands. The map below is the contrast between ancient and recent Diaoyu Island and Ryukyu Islands (map omitted). From the historical records of Chinese, Ryukyu and other countries (including Japan), Ryukyu has long been the vassal states of China since ancient times, which means the islands are the lands of China. Many people may know that Diaoyu Island is the land of China since the ancient times, but have no idea that the Japanese annexed Ryukyu Island (currently named as Okinawa, with U.S. military base). The society and the government of China is misled by the Japanese while they are discussing on the issues of the East China Sea, such as the “middle-line” set by the Japanese or “Okinawa issue” (Ryukyu Islands in Chinese), by coming to think that Ryukyu Islands are the ancient lands of Japan. What a shame for such ignorance! From the historical records of Chinese, Ryukyu and other countries (including Japan), Ryukyu has long been the vassal states of China since ancient times, which means the islands are the lands of China. In this case, is the “middle line” set by Japan in the East China Sea justified? Does Japan have anything to do with the East China Sea? (Those who have no idea in these details may refer to “Ryukyu: An indispensable part of China since the ancient times” written by me) The Japanese has robbed our wealth and resources in the East China Sea and unlawfully occupied Diaoyu Island and Ryukyu Islands for many years, the time will come that they have to pay back. At that time, we can expect that the U.S. will be willing to intervene but has weakened; Europe will keep silent; Russia will sit and watch the fight. The war can end within half of a year with overwhelming victory of China. Japan will have no choice but to return Diaoyu Island and Ryukyu Islands to China. East China Sea becomes the inner lake of China. Who dare to put a finger on it? The 5th War: Unification of Outer Mongolia (Year 2045 to 2050) Though there are advocates for reunification of Outer Mongolia at the moment, is this idea realistic? Those unrealistic guys in China are just fooling themselves and making a mistake in strategic thinking. This is just no good to the great work of unification of Outer Mongolia. China should also pick the groups advocating the unification, aiding them to take over key posts in their government, and to proclaim Outer Mongolia as the core interests of China upon the settlement of Southern Tibet issue by 2040. After taking Taiwan, we should base our territorial claims on the constitution and domain of the Republic of China (some people may raise a question here: why should we base our claims on the constitution and domain of the Republic of China? In such case, isn’t the People’s Republic of China being annexed by the Republic of China? This is a total bullshit. I will say: the People’s Republic of China is China; the Republic of China is China too. As a Chinese, I only believe that unification means power. The way which can protect the Chinese best from foreign aggression is the best way to the Chinese people. We also need to know that the People’s Republic of China recognizes the independence of Outer Mongolia. Using the constitution and domain of the People’s Republic of China to unify Outer Mongolia is naked aggression. We can only have legitimate cause to military action using the constitution and domain of the Republic of China. What’s more, it is the case after Taiwan being taken over by China. So isn’t it meaningless to argue which entity being unified?). China should raise the issue of unification with Outer Mongolia, and to take propaganda campaigns inside Outer Mongolia. China should also pick the groups advocating the unification, aiding them to take over key posts in their government, and to proclaim Outer Mongolia as the core interests of China upon the settlement of Southern Tibet issue by 2040. If Outer Mongolia can return to China peacefully, it is the best result of course; but if China meets foreign intervention or resistance, China should be prepared to take military action. Taiwan model can be useful in this case: giving an ultimatum with deadline in the Year 2045. Let Outer Mongolia to consider the case for few years. If they refuse the offer, then military action takes off. In this moment, the previous four wars have been settles. China has the political, military and diplomatic power to unify Outer Mongolia. The weakened U.S. and Russia dare not to get involved except diplomatic protests; Europe will take a vague role; while India, Africa and Central Asian countries will remain silent. China can dominate Outer Mongolia within three years’ time. After the unification, China will place heavy troops on frontier to monitor Russia. China will take ten years to build up elemental and military infrastructure to prepare for the claim of territorial loss from Russia. The 6th War: Taking back of lands lost to Russia (Year 2055 to 2060) The current Sino-Russian relationship seems to be a good one, which is actually a result of no better choice facing the U.S. In reality, the two countries are meticulously monitoring the each other. Russia fears the rise of China threaten its power; while China never forgets the lands lost to Russia. When the chance comes, China will take back the lands lost. When the Chinese army deprives the Russians’ ability to counter strike, they will come to realize that they can no longer match China in the battlefield. After the victories of the previous five wars by 2050, China will make territorial claims based on the domain of Qing Dynasty (similar way by making use of the domain of the Republic of China to unify Outer Mongolia) and to make propaganda campaigns favoring such claims. Efforts should also be made to disintegrate Russia again. In the days of “Old China”, Russia has occupied around one hundred and sixty million square kilometre of lands, equivalent to one-sixth of the landmass of current domain of China. Russia is therefore the bitter enemy of China. After the victories of previous five wars, it is the time to make Russians pay their price. There must be a war with Russia. Though at that time, China has become an advanced power in navy, army, air and space forces, it is nevertheless the first war against a nuclear power. Therefore, China should be well prepared in nuclear weapons, such as the nuclear power to strike Russia from the front stage to the end. When the Chinese army deprives the Russians’ ability to counter strike, they will come to realize that they can no longer match China in the battlefield. They can do nothing but to hand over their occupied lands and to pay a heavy price to their invasions Rate this Article

No worries, if you know your history you would probably realize that a bamani from kashmir decimated and made them cry back to Lahore. Still probably the worst loss in moslem history. And I remember another community as well that thought they were so tough. Go Modi- light that country on fire! With a nationalist PM in Japan about to give up its pacifist way, the pro-india northern alliance, a hostile Iran on the other side and Narender Modi on this side we need to return the favour quickly and efficiently. Light that country on fire...

Modi bullied Sharif over terrorism, showed him the way forward: Pak journalist ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Narendra Modi "bullied" his Pakistani counterpart Nawaz Sharif over terrorism at their first meeting, a writer in a Pakistani newspaper said on Thursday. Jalees Hazir said in The Nation that Modi not "only bullied him over terrorism and (the) Mumbai attack but also showed him the way forward ... brushing issues of importance to Pakistan ... under the carpet. "The irony is that though he might not be able to say it in so many words, this also seems to be our prime minister's lopsided blueprint for peace with India," said Hazir, a freelance columnist. A day after he took oath as Prime Minister, Modi held bilateral meetings with Sharif and leaders of other Saarc nations and Mauritius who attended his swearing-in ceremony. Pakistani officials said the Modi-Sharif meeting went off very well. Hazir said: "Our prime minister's platitudes about peace and cooperation seemed more than a bit out of place in the face of the thorny issues highlighted by the Indian side. Had he been invited to be lectured by the new Prime Minister of India? "Actually, it was Modi's harsh lecturing of a guest which was in bad taste..." "The prime minister's desire for friendly ties with India is all very well but it obviously takes two to tango. And anyone following Modi's campaign should have known that he was in no mood to dance." http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/pakistan/Modi-bullied-Sharif-over-terrorism-showed-him-the-way-forward-Pak-journalist/articleshow/35734586.cms