tonyhp32

What a dumb comparison. The guy who kept these girls a prisoner did so in secret, trying to avoid getting caught. The Hindustanis who did this did what they did in the open without any fear of the consequences. It shows the animal mentality of the Hindustanis. It is only because this news in now getting an airing that there has been any action otherwise atrocities like these happen most everyday in India. As for your scenario of the world and his wife coming to India's aid in a war you are deluded as the leadership in India is. What did the world do in 1962 apart from making a few noises and giving India their outdated and surplus equipment the West did nothing. India nuke Bangladesh? They couldn't even retaliate when their troops were mutilated by the Bangladeshis and you think they have the balls to nuke Bangladesh! So basically India is a country where everyone faces injustice. As the main reason for the existence of a government is to provide security, peace, justice and economic well being of the people and according to you it has failed to provide justice then why should it exist at all. As for the lauding Indian 'democracy', I am assuming this is based on newsreports that some western body has been congratulating India about how it ran the elections, they are doing so because of their racist attitude through which they have a low expectation of non-whites. Precedents? So you think that opening giving out alcohol and drugs, capturing polling booths, threats of violence and actual violence are precedents for the west? You truly are a joker!

He is a pitiful figure, A man who invaded his own people's holiest shrine and massacred his own people at the behest of the enemies of his own people. He is more than a traitor and his name will be a byword for treachery just as the word Dogra and the names Lal Singh and Tej Singh have become byword for traitors. Both him and KPS Gill have been used by their masters and like old pots and pans who are now not needed they are left on the scrapheap with the rest of the rubbish.

The inability of India to get back areas that it claims are hers was brought in because of your and Sher's mutual masturbation about Modi's abilities at pushing other PMs around. This thread was about Modi and the AAP in Punjab. Yes, I would love it if China tests Modi as I believe that like all so-called hard men he is a coward and being a Gujju and a Hindu to boot that makes that belief virtually 100% likely. Maybe with the Chinese army in Delhi he'll find that his love of serving tea to others will return and he can become a chah wala again to some of the Chinese generals! If China attacks then Pakistan and probably Bangladesh won't be far behind. Pakistan wants Kashmir, China wants Arunachal Pradesh and Bangladesh wants Assam and the NE for their greater Bangladesh scheme. We'll see what the Hindustani soldier is made of in such an eventuality. Hopefully such an attack from three directions will give the Sikh soldiers the incentive to revolt like some did in 1984. In any war you need allies, in a Sikh war for independence then China would the greatest ally along with Pakistan. What exactly is wrong with that given that you have been going on about Modi's possible alliance with Afghanistan, Japan and Iran. So if the Sikhs alone cannot kick India out of Punjab then isn't that the same as India not being able to defeat the Chinese without it's allies?

So how difficult is it for a government to place a bomb in an aeroplane of it's national airline?

There is no unease. We know the Hindu fighting ability apart from a few martial races is negligible. The Sikhs matched the Hindus in the pre-partition Punjab. Even their educational levels were better than the Hindus. Had there been no partition and the British rule had continued the Sikhs would have outstripped the Hindus within a few decades. There is very little data on economics by religious group in present day India but where some studies have been done the Sikhs always come second after Parsis. the Hindus are usually just above the Muslims. The Muslim gang story looks more like a Hindu myth than anything based on reality. I suppose like that famous cartoon in the early days of the internet where a dog is at a computer keyboard and is saying to another dog "On the internet nobody knows you are a dog", so with you and other people like you who pretend to the Sikhs we can see a puny Hindu saying to another bhaya "On the Internet nobody knows you are a Hindu!". So Hindus can put all sorts of BS about how so and so Hindu did this to a Muslim or Sikh blah blah blah. The reality is always the reverse.

It might not have been slum infested in the 17th century but it is a complete shythole now. Tail between our legs? That is a Hindu thing and the Hindu only fights once he is in a mob and his enemies are alone or few in number. It's not for no reason that are Hindus are compared to animals that hunt in packs such as jackals and hyenas. Look at the Hindus in Punjab in 1947 apart from the Haryana Jats the rest were just cattle ready to be slaughtered by the Muslims. It was the Sikhs that saved your ungrateful people. Unfortunately the Sikh leadership lost the opportunity to create Khalistan and allowed millions of ungrateful Hindus to settle in Sikhs areas of East Punjab. That is the real tragedy of 1947. The Punjabi Hindus should have gone to Haryana and Delhi and UP. The Sikhs should have stayed in the Sikh areas of Punjab and there would not have been a need for a Punjabi suba struggle. As for the last decades of the 20th century, the real Kharkoos when there was unity among them used to rule the Punjab and the Police and bhaya central police force used to hide in their thanas and camps. Don't worry my friend no where is history has oppression stopped a nation's fight for freedom and Khalistan is no exception, the time will come when the Hindustanis and their chumchas like you will be kicked out of Punjab. While the Sikh remember their history the Hindu can only tell stories from his mythology. It took many decades for the Khalsa Raj to come to Punjab the first time around and the Khalsa will rule again in Punjab. All freedom struggles have their ups and down, the Mughals had declared twice that the Khalsa had been destroyed in the 18th century and yet a few decades later the Khalsa was ruling from Jhelum to Yamuna.

The GOI had both the resources as well as the motive and motivation to carry out the Air India bombing. For a country like India killing 300 odd people, many their own citizens in order to give the Sikhs a bad name in the west is a small price. Sher, do you really think that Rajiv Gandhi and the Indian intelligence agencies had any morals which would have stopped them murdering their own people?

Pakistan has played the Americans very well and if it was a case of dollars then why did the Americans invade when they could have just opened their wallets and swept the Taliban from power. I have no love for the Taliban but unlike closed minded Modi prasts like you, I understand reality and not hopeful thinking. The homeland of the Sikhs is Punjab, both East and West. 99% of our shrines are in this area, the rest of India is a dump. India a strong country? What a joke, feed half the population with three square meals, give 70% of the population proper sanitation and proper housing and get rid of the corruption that is endemic in India where nothing gets done without a bribe and perhaps your slum infested country might be considered 'strong'. Modi cannot create a stable government. Either he will become emasculated like Manmohan Singh and lead the country to economic disaster or he will act like the bully he is pick a fight with the wrong country/minority/religion and like all bullies run with his tail between his legs.

India can try all it likes to create coalitions but it will fail miserably. It is surrounded by hostile neighbours on all sides. Once the US leaves Afghanistan the likelihood is that the Hindustani lover Karzai will be hanging from the nearest lamp post. Either the Taliban will take over or Afghanistan will be in for another period of civil war between the Taliban and the Northern Alliance. So there goes one Indian ally. As for Iran, Modi has to play a balancing act because he is for closer ties with Israel as well. Any more closer ties with Israel which is what the Israelis desperately want and he will lose any support from Iran. Japan has been in the midst of a depression for the last 20 years. It might want to rearm but it has a history of having weak governments which fall every few years. If you think Japan will be any use then just look at it's armed forces, they can just about defend their own country. The USA won't be of much use to you, China could bring down the US financial system by selling off US government bonds and do you think the Wall St bankers will allow things to get that far. If there is a war between India and China, the only hope for India is it's nuclear weapons. No Afghans, Iranians, Japanese or Americans will rush to help Modi. Only nuclear weapons can save India from a repeat of 1962. Although it is still possible that the Chinese after a few year may tire of the loud mouth Modi and assess that putting him in his place like they did to the arrogant Nehru might be worth it.

Nothing more amusing than a Hindu talking tough as some are doing here and a Gujju taking on the Punjabi establishment in Pakistan is an even bigger laugh. We will see in a few years time when Modi bites off more than he can chew and we will see that coward for what he is.

Keep reading the Indian media, it's obviously turned you into a HIndustani drone. Modi bullying Sharif? what a joke. Let's see him extradite the planner of the Mumbai attacks or even get the training camps closed down. The India media will keep on lionising Modi and these stories will continue until he meets his first real crisis. When that happens he will be as useless as the previous 15 muppets who have ruled India since the British left. Nice to know that you at least have some semblance of sanity left in you and understand that India can never win a war against China.

China hasn't done anything about Arunachal Pradesh because there are no strategic assets there. But that might change if the coward Modi tries to do some sabre rattling or shoots his mouth off. Russia's Black Sea fleet is based in Crimea and that is the main reason why they have taken such a tough stance against Ukraine. If you think that fear of India is stopping the Chinese from walking into Arunachal Pradesh and Northern India like the Germans walked into France in 1940 then you are as deluded as Modi is. Short of a nuclear response, India cannot take on the Chinese army and if it does come to pass that the Chinese invade, most of the Punjabi Hindus will be switching their kids from English Medium schools to ones teaching Mandarin so they can take advantage of the new set up! What a joke! India defends the human rights of Tibetans and yet has one of the worst human rights records in Asia!

Stop your wet dreams. If anything it is the Muslims that are on their way to dominating you! Look at the discussion on this thread-; http://www.niticentral.com/2013/05/03/why-is-census-2011-silent-on-religious-data-73065.html The Hindus even though they are over 80% are scared that the census will show them below 80%! If these cowards are so scared when they are 80% then you can imagine how these 'shers' will be when they start to dwindle down in the next few decades.

Kashmir state having acceded to India then the whole of the state belonged to India. It does not matter if the tribals got the territory before the accession. India should have taken the whole state and by not doing so it became known as a soft state and hence the reason that the Chinese kicked the Hindustanis arse in 1962. What does the existence of Hindu temples in Indonesia prove? The Hindus there were converted by means of Arab traders so those millions did not think much of their previous Hindu religion and culture and went over to Islam without even a second though. If Hindu religion and culture was really that superior as you seem to imply then Indonesia is a very poor example to try and prove your point.

Azad Kashmir was lost to Pakistan when India was an independent country and could have done something about it. The Chinese claimed areas in the NE were attached to India by the British and not the Indians. The Indians just lose territory and never conquer territory apart from enclaves from tired and uninterested foreign powers.

How many of these crimes were solved and the perpetrators jailed? Hardly any, so it begs the question how is it that the government couldn't convict anyone of these crimes? The fact is that most of these were committed by government agents or police sponsored terrorists and then innocent Sikhs were picked up and murdered in so-called police encounters and they were accused of being the perpetrators of these massacres. Gullible people like Sher who appear to believe everything the govt tells them probably believes in Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny!

You need to stop reading the Indian media which for the most part created the Modi wave. If you just read the Indian media you would assume the Pakistani govt has already ordered a thousand metres of white cloth to turn into white flags! If the Pakistanis are panicking then I assume the Hindu 'sher' Modi will show is strength in the next crisis? Actually why wait for the next crisis, Pakistan is occupying territory claimed by India (Azad Kashmir) and so is China (Aksai Chin). So will Modi demand that these territories be vacated by both these countries? I mean which self respecting country allows another state to occupy it's territory?

Mann and the anti-Badal Akalis got over 6 Lakh votes in the SGPC elections. There are a lot more Khalistanis than you think and AAP got a lot of their votes. Khalistan is alive and well in Punjab and all it needs is a leader and then your worst nightmares will come true.

The fact that AAP got 3.3 million votes mainly Sikh rural votes without having to give on bottle of sharab shows you are talking BS as usual. When the people see a real alternative they will votes of them in their millions.

The problem is the perception that the Sikh nationalists are split into factions. Simranjeet Singh Mann is to blame for this as well as he put up a candidate in Patiala even when there was a good candidate in Bibi Kamaldeep Kaur who eventually got over 15,000 votes compared to Mann's candidate who got less than 3,000. Had Mann supported her and then there is every likelihood she could have got votes many times the number she actually got and AAP would have lost the deat. This lack of unity contrasts with the unity shown by the AAP. AAP had also shown that a new party could win many seats as they did in Delhi so that also helped them in Punjab. The Sikh nationalists need to take a look at what AAP has achieved. AAP used Sikh issues to propel themselves into becoming a political force. The fact that it could not do this in the rest of India shows that it was purely Punjab issues that made them a political force.

Looks like some journalists have noticed how it was the Panthic votes who ensured that the AAP made such a stunning debut in Punjab.

Nothing more amusing than two Lalas boasting about how they are going to destroy Pakistan. Seems like just another form of mutual masturbation. You guys seem to be mistaking your country for an Israel. Your slum infested country is not an Israel, only Israel can hit terrorist training camps. Modi will follow the same policy as Vajpayee talking tough but doing very little. Let's see him try and copy the Israeli tactics. I didn't see him to much when the pakis attacked the Hindu temple in Gujarat in 2002 killing 30 Hindu pilgrims, he was CM then and the BJP were governing the country. Can you imagine the reaction in Pakistan if some Indians had attacked a mosque in Pakistan and killed 30 Muslims. Modi is a coward possibly with a suspect sexuality having suddenly come up recently come up with a wife he married in his younger days.

This is in Punjab and Mohali city has a Sikh majority. So why does it irk you that the authority is doing something positive for Sikhs. What about the thousands of crores spent by Hindu majority states on useless Gaushalas just to keep the Hindus happy.

Only twice in the last 30 years since Bluestar has there being a feeling that the elections are going to throw up a real surprise. First was the 1989 Lok Sabha polls when the Akali Dal of Simranjeet Singh Mann won 7 seats and the next one is the polls now which has shown that the Panthic vote can make a difference if only the Panthic leaders unite and take on both the Congress and Akali-BJP.

Wrong. Jagraon assembly constituency includes Jagroan town which has a 55% Sikh majority and the overwhelming Sikh majority rural areas where the Sikhs are over 90%. So the assembly constituency is overwhelming Sikh. The AAP only fielded 10 out of 13 candidates who were Sikh. Apart from Gandhi, there was Satnam Paul Kamboj from Ferozpur and Yamini Gomar from Hoshiarpur. But your point is well taken and confirms what I have pointed out that the chief supporters of AAP in Punjab were Sikhs and hence the reason why AAP chose a majority of Sikh candidates. Although social media was full of photos of AAP volunteers in Ludhiana city with their 'aam aadmi' hats supporting H S Phoolka, it was the Sikh majority rural areas that voted for him in a big way. Wrong. You need to credit Sikh voters with a lot more intelligence than you seem to do. In areas where the AAP candidate was weak the Sikh voters especially the Panthic voters went to the best alternative to give the Akalis and BJP a bloody nose. This was the case in Amritsar where Lala Jaitley had been convinced the Akali idiots that he would win by a margin of 1.5 lakh votes! He even bought a house in Amritsar thinking he could rely on the Akali fools to send him to parliament. Like Amritsar, the AAP candidate from Bathinda was weak and hence the Panthic vote went for Manpreet Badal because it was essential to defeat Badal's daughter in law. As it was she won by pnly 19,000 votes whereas again the Akalis were making tall claims of winning the seat by another 1.5 lakh votes. She hasn't even taken out a victory parade and has legged it to Delhi. Even the papers report that Manpreet Badal has been congratulated from all sides and not one cares about Akali candidate. She managed to keep her vote by getting some dalit votes from the Congress by her party giving out 6 months of atta and dal at nominal rate of one rupee per kilo of atta and 30 rupees per kilo of dal. Her constituency has also had money thrown at it and one only needs to see the development there compared to the other areas of Punjab. In Patiala the Hindu Punjabi is more communal than in most other areas. The Punjab bandh in 2012 in support of Bhai Rajoana saw clashes between Sikhs and HIndus. Again you are wrong here. It was in rural areas that Gandhi (even given his unfortunate surname) got the most votes. In Jalandhar if you look at the voting strength of both Congress and Akali-BJP in the 2012 assembly elections compared to this election then it shows that Akali-BJP combine polled 144,000 votes less votes this time and the Congress only polled about 18,000 less. So the Majority of the votes that AAP got in Jalandhar was from the Akali-BJP. Now if you think that the communal Hindu Punjabi who voted for Akali-BJP in 2012 is going to vote for a party which has done more for Sikhs in a few months then other parties have done on 30 years and in spite of the Modi wave in the rest of the country then you really need your head examining!