Beast

erm....thanks.

2 vs 2 actually! Also, without video evidence they don't have a case because they weren't driving behind me when I crossed the lights. They approached from a different direction so couldn't see what colour the lights were when I passed through.

Guys, I was driving home late last night and turned right at a T-junction where the lights were 100% amber...NOT RED. As I'm driving down there's a car drivin pretty close behind me - blue lights start flashing and it turns out to be an unmarked police car. I sat in the back and the driver told me I had jumped a red light. Confusion hit me coz I thought it was amber. He said no, and that it's on their camera thing in the car. I asked to see, he said no coz it's on continuous record. I apologised if I went through a red light, but it wasn't intentional and to the best of my knowledge it was amber. The guy wasn't having it and said that I could have caused an accident etc and therefore he was gonna give me a fixed penalty notice + 3 points....OR I could go to court to object. I asked to see the video in a few days - he said no. I asked whether my solicitor would have access to the video should the case go to court - he said no. When I got the ticket I gave him a piece of my mind - i.e. I am a law-abiding citizen of good character with no previous criminal record; and it would have been much more appropriate to have given me a "slap on the wrist". We had a little argument - I told him he shud be chasing thieves. He said he wanted to but had to spend too much time dealin with ppl like me :!: His colleague told me to get out of the car and leave. I'm cheesed off. Told my dad abt it and he said it's up to me whether I take this matter further. I'm adamant that I went through an Amber light, as is my mate, so I'm seriously considering taking this to court. I'm not too sure why I wasn't allowed to see the video either! Just wanna know from any UK ppl whether or not they've been through summat similar and what advice they've got. The Beast is not happy.

1. which nail? 2. Sodhi has problems bendng down to tie his shoelaces. 3. learn to spell (both of u). 4. girls wanna be with me and men wanna be me. 8)

hehehe, kaur_05 just called me sexy as well! hmmmm.....the beast is bad, bad to the bone 8)

(admin-cut) Moderator Note: Beast, you are damn sexy and we in the Admin Team love you. We would all like to be on your studfarm 8)

yes. yes it was. and i'm spending it all on poppycocks.

they clever. they took ur money and ran.

august 21st-august 27th isn't it? or are we on abt some other camp? :?

the clock is ticking dear sir.

lol i forgot all abt that! MOOHOOHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

where can one findeth such people? It's not for me, erm...it's for a mate.

hasn't the turban been proven to be safer then a helmet?

i don't get ur message - are u saying no to meat or no to cannibalism? (ps forcing someone to eat meat is just as bad as forcing someone to be vegetarian.)

lol, the pic on the main page (the "Great Activities" one) just reminded me of Sodhi's doppelganger! hehehe

Singh holding rifle is the one in the Nihang documentary who gave his son away to do sewa for Baba Hari Singh's Dal

cheers

I put your reply on there...hope you don't mind!

Just to give you a flavour of what's going on...

did the bride and groom know of the controversy? If not, then that is a massive shame for them.

thank god I'm too young to remember that.

ah man - been havin an interesting debate with a guy on SikhPortal who hates Islam. He even went as far as to say that the Gurus clearly did not *understand* Islam because it contradicts what they preached!

do this without conch 1st: top lip slightly over bottom. fill your mouth with air and slowly relesae it at high pressure it's something like that - I've only tried it on a couple of occasions, but managed to do it each time. Your cheeks will hurt afterwards!

lol, *coughn30nickedthemfromsikhportalforumcough*

The thing is Singh47 is that the girl's brother had a white girlfriend who the family were fine with. Before this fact came to light, I got into a whole load of trouble on another forum for suggesting that even though the father's actions were disgraceful, the daughter was not exactly innocent either. She undertook an action that she knew would destroy her family.* *This obviously changed when we learn that it was acceptable for her bro to be able to do the same thing