Amarjeet Singh_1737

look to the left though.

With all due respect don't you think its unfortunate that many Sikhs know the history of individuals who belong to both Nirmala and Udasi sampradas, but are ignorant about the history of Nihung saints? Other than Baba Deep Singh Ji, Baba Gurbax Singh Ji, Baba Santa Singh Ji and a few other jathedars of Nihung-Singh Dals how many other Nihungs are we aware of who have contributed to the panth?

Guys what the hell.... dudes a muslim so even if it wasn't intentional their ideology is factually rubbished again.

From what I know gyani Gurbachan Singh ji actually was a master of a few aspects of shastarvidya.

Victor Jacquemont cites that the commercial practice of Radical Islam was forbidden. 'The population is a mixture of different people and religions. Hindus and Muhammadans are less common than Sikhs, in whose hands is practically all of the business, to the prosperity of which Amritsar owes it flourishing appearance. There are also a large number of Kashmiris and Afghans; the former weave or spin, the latter speculate. There is not a single mosque, and the public practice of the Muhammadan religion is forbidden. The Hindu temples are small and scarce. The religion of Nanak admits no rivals at Amritsar.' Whereas many Hindus would ardently convert just to dispatch their Islamic tyrants to Allah and escape the befuddlement of Varna, it seems the strong psychopathy invoked by the Sharia was present even historically and subsequently oppressed.

By the way that blog tisarpanth has a facebook page now. They are happy to receive any criticisms on there. Plus its got some good info and hes getting out of his Hinduphobia. https://www.facebook.com/Tisarpanth Just wondering if Niddar has any blogs?

Will try outpacing my 'morony' by doing what u say veer ji.

In the morning along with the required 5 banis I also read Bhagauti astotar and try increasing my recitation everyday. However I want to add more dasam banis to my nitnem. Are there any apps which I can download which will let me do this. Something with pronunciations in both english and punjabi. Plus how do I invoke the Bir-Rass which these banis contain? Plus is all of dasam bani bir rass bani?

Hes also got a fb page along with RamblingsofaSikhblogspot (sic) and tisarpanth. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Manglacharan-Puran-Sarbloh-Granth/130098133706848 https://www.facebook.com/RamblingsofaSikh https://www.facebook.com/Tisarpanth

Same shit all over Anglophonic nations. In NZ a young Sikh bodyguard is killed and the judge releases the guilty party saying, 'they did not MEAN to murder him.'

Here u go veer ji, http://sikh-reality.blogspot.co.nz/2009/10/sarbloh-guru-granth-sahib-bani.html

Veer Ji I have a few questions regarding the Aad-Shakti and waheguru. 1.) Does our perception construe them to be two individual deities? 2.) Are they one and the same at a particular level? 3.) If we worship Waheguru why do we also pay homage to the Shakti which is under him? 4.) Does this Shakti also possess a Sargun/Nirgun form? 5.) Why is it usually depicted as a female?

Bullshit.

Who are these forty men the Sarbloh Granth mentions? ਤਾ ਮਹਿ ਪੰਥ-ਚਾਲਿਸ ਪ੍ਰਵਾਨਾ, ਪੰਚ ਪ੍ਰਧਾਨ ਖਾਲਸਹਿ ਠਏ ॥ From forty men, five leaders of the Khalsa emerged ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਅਜੀਤ ਸਿੰਘ, ਜੁਝਾਰ ਸਿੰਘ, ਫਤਹ ਸਿੰਘ, ਜੋਰਾਵਰ ਸਿੰਘ ਪ੍ਰਿਏ ॥ They were the beloved Ajit Singh, Jujhar Singh, Fateh Singh, and Zorawar Singh ਪੰਚਮ ਖਾਲਸਹ ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਪੂਰਾ ਜਿਨ ੲੇ ਪੰਥ ਸੁਪੰਥ ਪ੍ਰਟਗਏ ॥੬॥ The fifth leader of the Khalsa who completes the total was the Satguru (Gobind Singh), he who revealed this noble Panth ਚਾਲਿਸ ਨਰ ਏ ਬੀਜ ਖਾਲਸਹ, ਮੁਕਤੇ ਪਾਵਨ ਸਿੰਘ ਬਲੀ ॥ Forty men were the seed of the Khalsa, powerful Singhs who won liberation Ang 495 of Sarbloh Granth Tika

Veer Ji why is the Aad-Shakti so essential in the Khalsa ethos. Is it a dual form of the lord?

Hes 18, works as a budding student in the construction industry but wants to go to uni so is academically alright etc...... We have tried everything before (this isn't what it sounds like ok) but nothing works. What about female companionship???? You know like a female explaining to him shes not an object and lust is bad. Might get it across to him.

I have an amritdhari friend but hes got a big as problem. Due to some tensions hes become sexually active, he was pretty repressed before (we all know the Punjabi attitude), anyway now he cannot control his kaam and porn's become a big action. For some reason he just wants to have sex and get it done with out of the way. Its ruining a good chap. What can I do to save him???

Do any such newspapers exist contemporarily?

Can you expand on the saakhi veer ji?

I think I just found my answer, what do you think veer ji??? Unethical conventions, subtle plagiarism(s) and a subsequent ethnographic genocide of the Arabian Jewish populace catalyzed in the ascension of cynical pragmatism in the Islamic psyche. One such cognitive of the latter, the Halalethic, is nothing more than and nothing less than a paradoxical mimicry of the Jewish kosher. Constructed to stratify the Prophet’s own from the infidel the practice, as Leach defines it, is a Freudian ambivalence of religious censorship, censuring one from the perceived effects of another simultaneous sect. ‘In nearly all societies food is one of the tags by which members of the different social classes are differentiated. We eat this; they eat that. What we eat is "good," "prestigious," "clean;" what they eat is "bad," "defiling" and "dirty."' (1) Why such a censorship came into effect is a matter of extensive rational moot, it seems that Muhammad was duly concerned about the evolving religious and ethnographic ambiguity of his Arabian band and subsequently incorporated, what is perceived as being, pagan practices justified via Biblical fiction. To this end many Jewish and Christian norms were subtly engraved into the Arabian psyche, as Zwemer so critically analyzes it, 'Islam is nothing more nor less than Judaism plus the apostle-ship of Mohammad.' (2) The latter periodically abrogated his divine revelations as any concurrent situation rectified or evolved out of his control, consequentially many Islamists employ it as an excuse to purport the authenticity and veracity of their creed; yet fail to rationally answer as to the existence of simultaneous elements prevalent in both Islam and Judaism. Kosher and Halal are both deemed as cognitives of ritual slaughter and subsequently employ Argumentum ad Populum as justifications. Yet scientific rationality shreds the veil of religiosity asunder and manifests the truth. Inhumanely both Halal and Kosher declare the stunning of an animal, prior to the fundamental procedure being executed, an anathema. As the Halal Tayyib Meat organisation so critically asserts,Islamic ruling states that meat from a stunned animal will not be accepted even if it kills just one single chicken or animal...' (3) The latter diatribe is of great import in understanding the contemporary Halal debate, as the latter requires a prolonged (in comparison to other slaughtering techniques) demise of the said victim. The conclusive verdict is provided by Dr. A Majid Katme who compares stunning with carrion, thus highlighting the fact that preliminary stunning to an animal before Halal might as well violate Muhammad's dictums (4), 'Say: I do not find, in what is revealed, to me aught forbidden to him who eats thereof except it be carrion or blood outpoured...' (5) The bloody pragmatism via which Halal is engineered and subsequently executed is devoid of any humanity. Despite the entire ideologies claim to promote and preserve animal rights, Islam's slaughter practice reveals it's often contradictory and hypocritical nature. Although Islamic organisations claim Halal to be an epitomic procedure of humane slaughter, the latter can be interpreted as being nothing more than a fallacious veil to justify the ideology'sArgumentum ad Antiquitatem. Let us now cast a glance at some common myths orbiting Halal. 1.) Ritual slaughter is instantaneous and painless. Fact: The optimism expressed via such a view is ironically nothing short of a whitewashed fallacy, asserted in Western spheres to provide an exemplary implication of a backwater Merchant's divinity. A majority of contemporary Islamists rely on a scientific study conducted in 1974-1978 A.D. to evidence such a claim. The study which was executed at the behest of Wilhelm Schulz at the Hannover University in Germany employed EEG techniques to essay animal brainwaves, whilst the latter were undergoing slaughter. The study duly concluded that Halal was a humane prerogative and subsequently worthy of mass employment, inflating the Islamic proletariat's ego. Yet even Schulz admitted that the techniques employed, at the time, had their own downfalls and via his perspective did not express a conclusive view over whether Halal truly was humane or not (6). A subsequent studied published in 2009, via the expenditure of Massey University in Palmerston North, New-Zealand, evidences otherwise. Conducted under the analyzation of Dr. Craig Johnson it purports to have reproduced ritualistic slaughter and gained an analysis which is 'surprising to the religious community.' (7) Via the latter even when animals were anesthetized, a painful response was detected up to two minutes after the preliminary incision dismissing any myths on the veracity of Islamic slaughter. 2.) Halal condones the drainage of blood. Once the blood is drained, an animal loses oxygen and subsequently is devoid of any responsiveness to pain. Fact: Johnson simultaneously initiated a procedure where all the participants in his study essayed the distinct levels of responsiveness to pain. It was concluded that the Islamic excuse (as mentioned above) was nothing short of a superficial myth. Ironically Arabian science failed to realize that it is not blood which is the carrier of pain, but the nerve cells. The incision, propagated in Halal, slices the throat nerves birthing an extreme response in the victim, which temporarily suffers before it's demise. Subsequently the birth of varied toxins, as a response to the pain, renders the meat poisoned up to a superficial extent; birthing the possibility that an allergic reaction could easily catalyze in an unwary consumer. As Johnson stated, 'it wasn't a surprise to me, but in terms of the religious community, they are adamant animals don't experience any pain, so the results might be a surprise to them.' (8)Unfortunately for him, his Islamic critics are still in ardent denial. 3.) The Koran condemns stunning, subsequently Muslims are not allowed to consume blood due to it's harmful qualities. Simultaneously a stunned animal does not allow easy drainage of blood. Fact: As Haluk Anil of the Bristol University, UK, concluded after a prolonged study stunning does not affect blood drainage. 'Stunning does not impede blood loss, therefore this objection cannot be used any more.' (9) 4.) The employment of a sharp knife renders any painful reactions nullified. Fact: A sharp knife is a generic parcel of the problem. As the FAWC found in a study concluded in 2003, 'when a very large transverse incision is made across the neck a number of vital tissues are transected including: skin, muscle, trachea, oesophagus, carotid arteries, jugular veins, major nerve trunks (e.g. vagus and phrenic nerves) plus numerous minor nerves. Such a drastic cut will inevitably trigger a barrage of sensory information to the brain in a sensible (conscious) animal. We are persuaded that such a massive injury would result in very significant pain and distress in the period before insensibility supervenes.' (10) 5.) The Prophet has inunciated a singular incision for Halal. The latter pragmatically nullifies any pain. Fact: D.K. Blackmore, an ardent educationalist of veterinary pathology points out that it is not the varied employment of the utensil, but it's preliminary conditions which renders Halal primitive. His cliched reiteration, however, does not seem to bear out on the concoctions of neo-Islamists. 'A BASIC requirement for humane slaughter is that an animal should be rendered insensible before exsanguination (bleeding) is initiated and this should last until the animal becomes permanently insensible from cerebral anoxia.' (Emphasis ours), (11). Simultaneously he evidences his rationalizations via several experiences, 'lambs collapsed after an average of 2.6 seconds and stopped attempting to stand after 10 seconds (not being able to stand does not mean inability to feel); in contrast calves were standing up to 135 seconds after their throat was cut and were attempting to stand up to 385 seconds after that. Even though the calves had both carotid arteries and jugular veins severed three out of four were breathing up to 11.6 minutes later and so were shot. Lambs were gasping for up to 3.8 minutes after carotid arteries and jugular veins were cut.' (12) 6.) A number of liberal muslims propagate reversible stunning. Fact: Yet, as the 2008 Adams-Sheridan report concluded, even such a procedure is invalid. 'Reversible stunning is not in itself sufficient to lead to death of the animal. All stunning must be inextricably linked to the performance of slaughter using a reliable and fast means of exsanguination.' (13) In layman's terms such a procedure is even more painful, especially if the stunning proves fallible (the statistics are extreme) and the animal regains consciousness whilst undergoing a red-hazed orgy of slaughter in the name of Allah. Ironically however such a stunning itself is against Islamic norms, as the Sha'ria states that an animal must hear it's own slaughtering prayers.(14) 7.) Whether Halal is painful or vice versa, the procedure evidently drains the blood of an animal. Thus the meat is rendered consumable, digestible and fit for humanity. Fact: Another optimistic salvo, yet as the BVA concludes, the result of blood drainage would most likely catalyze in the creation of chemical toxins which would seep into the very meat itself (stress hormones) rendering the meat, at the most, exposed to bacterial infections.(15) An Ineffectual Revulsion to Swine. It will be highly ambiguous if one was to ignore the Islamic revulsion to swine whilst discussing the ideology's flesh consumption. It seems that the Islamic God is not solely capable of birthing an ambiguous, and oft an illogical text termed as a perfect book. The latter, in his perfect state, (emphasis ours) is also subsequently capable of birthing'abominations' although to what purposes or end(s) is ardently veiled. 'Say: I do not find, in what is revealed to me, aught forbidden to him who eats thereof except it be carrion, or blood outpoured, or the flesh of swine- that is an abomination.' (16) Paul Theroux, the imminent nomadic journalist, evidences the psychopathic hostility displayed by Islam towards swine whilst recounting his horror, and subsequent revulsion on the often graphic demonstrations held against the American caricature Miss Piggy in Islamic nations; 'you know you have travelled through the looking glass when you are in a country where Miss Piggy is seen as the very embodiment of evil. (emphasis ours).' (17) A keen analyzation of pre-Islamic Arabia furnishes an Arabia where the indigenous residents were fundamentally unaware of the presence of swine. Simultaneously even classic historians, in a parallel vein to Pliny, failed to recognize any subsequent presence of the said beast in the region. It seems that Muhammad mimed the Jewish ideologue in attaching a hostile significance to swine. Contemporarily Islamic scholars and pseudo-scientists, whilst envisioning the so-called rationality of Arabian norms, purport the swine's tendency to introduce Trichinosis into the human anatomy. Yet the latter is evidently a disease often preferring cold and temperate regions (18), subsequently it is more feasible in Europe and America rather than the humid Middle East. (19) Simultaneously, it is plausible for the organism to infiltrate undercooked meat (emphasis ours), yet it is significant to note undercooked meat. Simultaneously Islamic apologists often veil their ineffectual fallacies via highlighting the filthy habits of pigs. Yet the latter are not specifically worse than chickens and goats who also consume dung. Subsequently it is evident to note that all Islamic schools allow the consumption of the carrion consuming Hyena, surely Muhammad in all his perfectness must have realized that the latter's consummation possess an ardent danger to the human stomach; more so than swine? It was this illogicality which the Akali-Nihungs gleefully exploited to test an Islamic apostate's veracity in preliminary periodicals (20). It is however the imminent author, and a much demonized personality in the Islamic universe, Salman Rushdie who has the conclusive word. Whilst documenting and crafting a sitcom on Pakistani television he ran into several obstacles, positioned by subtle clergy, even whilst disseminating anti-swine propaganda. 'The character I played had a long monologue in which he described his landlady's dog's repeated attacks on him. In an attempt to befriend the dog, he bought it half a dozen hamburgers. The dog refused and attacked him again. "I was offended," I was supposed to say. "It was six perfectly good hamburgers with not enough pork in them to make it disgusting." "Pork," a T.V. executive solemnly told me "is a four letter word." He had said the same thing about "sex" and "homosexual," but this time I argued back! The text, I pleaded, was saying the right thing about pork. Pork, in Albee's view, made hamburgers so disgusting that even dogs refused them.* This was superb anti-pork propaganda. It must stay! "You don't see,' the executive told me, "the work 'pork'may not be spoken on Pakistan tevelevision." And that was that.' (21) Sources: (1) Russell, Bertrand. (1935). Religion and Science. Thornton Butterworth, England: London. (2) Yohannes, B. (2013) Samuel Zwemer's Missionary Strategy Towards Islam. M. Phil thesis, University of Birmingham. (3) The Fallacy of Stunning the Animal Without being Killed. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://www.Halaltayyibmeat.com. (4) www.halalmc.org. (5) Koran, Sura 6.145. (7)ibid. (8)ibid. (9) Religious Slaughter. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://www.animalfrontiers.org. (10)http://www.fawc.org.uk/reports/pb8347.pdf (12)ibid. (13)ibid. (14)ibid. (15)ibid. (16) Koran, Sura 6.145. (17)Warraq, I. (2003). Why I am not a Muslim. New York City, NYC: Prometheus Books. (18)ibid. (19)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trichinosis (20) Akali-Nihangs. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://www.sarabloh.com. (21) Warraq, I. (2003). Why I am not a Muslim. New York City, NYC: Prometheus Books.

Their big destination in India is that Kama Sutra place. 'Your Indian??? Wow, you must have an intense sex life!'

You can take India and change it or you can create a new model, depends on you.

Yep in case u need a guaranteed citation from me.

The koran in my opinion is a preliminary 'Mein Kamf.'

May muhammad piss be upon him rejoice in whatever hell he resides.