Jump to content

Bruce Lung

Members
  • Posts

    279
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Bruce Lung

  1. use oil. you can get this gunky oil from india just for straightening your beard. although i think it's racist to even want to straighten your beard.
  2. well i think that making fun of disabled people like you did in your comment about the special olympics IS deeply offensive. i had to make that point. but if you're sorry about it i'm not going to keep rubbing it in. i just wanted to say it was out of order, that's all. and i think it's not inappropriate for me to point out that your repeated insistence that you will not reply to posts here may (will) be perceived as extremely arrogant. you give the impression you are somehow above having this discussion. i'm only pointing out that attitudes like that are ugly.
  3. it says: "Every living creature has an “inherent duty,†whether it is to fight in a war or be an educator, they are expected to fulfill that duty without argument or complaint." what is my duty?
  4. i really don't like your comments. you and i know very well what you're saying and if there's any decency in you you should apologise.
  5. do you get it? in this world people lean on the strongest.
  6. it doesn't bother me enough to want to go to the police. it might if the offenders were dangerous people though..
  7. Gur Fateh you can always talk to me about it. you know me. you could even ask for my help in this action, and i would give it. don't get upset over the internet. it's just a place for bored people to have a bit of a verbal scrap. EDIT: and if you detect any trace of annoyance perhaps it might be because i knew about things almost from day 1.
  8. been a long time since i was last there. i remember it being a much more boring place.
  9. there's no cure for anger like mine. except blood. lots and lots of blood. (violent movies)
  10. he wants sp to help out i think
  11. well ok but i think there is a huge potential for trouble to happen as a result of this type of direct action.
  12. propaganda aside i want anyone who thinks they know me to step out in defense of what you believe and say so. this is an ideal opportunity to set the record straight. going round in circles arguing on the internet here. GO ON "EXPOSE" ME. Hacking my computer and making innuendo and threats seems to be about the best you can manage.
  13. if you think you know me from somewhere come out and say so. chicken.
  14. please explain, if you would like to help someone who's learning. oh but i know you guys all too well. hypocrites.
  15. is this some kind of fraud? on unitedsikhs.com his name is cited as "Mehtab Singh (Rochak)" and over here neo has said he's "Mehtab Singh (Sian)". Photoshop??
  16. palm you wrote: "which motherland is this, the motherland that is occupying my motherland! The motherland that has consistently tried to undermine the sikh peoples, their culture, histroy, language and traditions?" this is exactly the problem. i don't think you understand the implications of what you're saying. nobody alive today was born in a sikh kingdom: everyone was born in India. if you're saying that punjab should have greater autonomy or even have total self-governance, say so. we might even agree. but don't say anyone is occupying "your" land matey. it's both our heritage. the only way it will fall into "hindu" or sikh hands is if genocide (another word you bandy around irresponsibly) of one at the hands of the other really does take place. and nobody wants that. as for destroying sikh traditions, religions and culture this is complete paranoid bollox man. sikh religion will be preserved for a very very long time, no matter what anyone tries to do.
  17. the problem is that you resorted to personal attacks. granted this is an emotive subject matter. i value open dialogue and reasoned discussion. but not everyone does. i go for restraint and tolerance. there is absolutely no question of any threat veiled or otherwise. however, i am right to point out that not everyone shares my egalitarianism or devotion to libertarian principles. i didn't say that white people are evil. i said that they should make reparations (not necessarily to GOI). u're gonna hate me for saying this but i know sikhs. sikhism is a violent religion (not for all the wrong reasons) and in this time a check has to be made on certain elements (not saying you're one of them - only that you're fanning the flames in a slightly reckless way) who have a dearth of reference material and resources in sikh scripture to justify violent acts.
  18. look palm i don't know you at all and i have not attempted to paint you as a fanatic. you have attempted to paint me as a drug addict though.. i think we can get on just fine as long as we can lay down the truth about some basic facts. bhindranwale was the figurehead of the khalistan movement and he was very careful about what he said. nevertheless he did not take sufficient care the check the actions of the youths who took him as an inspirational khalistani leader. non-sikhs were oppressed and intimidated in punjab in the early 80s - many businessmen were threatened and buses containing non-sikhs were blown up. in fact there was a lot of blowing up and killing going on. bhindranwale did not try to stop anyone, even though the widespread perception was that this was going on his name. he even recommended that every pind should have a motorcycle and 3 lads with guns. what for apart from for assassinations? are you now going to tell me that the fears and anxieties of non-sikhs in those days were ill-founded and paranoid? because of skunk consumption? non-sikhs were being terrorised out of punjab, and left their ancestral homeland in fear. that sounds like terrorism to me.
  19. do we at least agree that bhindranwale was a terrorist?
×
×
  • Create New...