ekta

I've noticed before that you did engage in debate on this forum, then when it got too hot for you you disappeared. What's the point of debating when you don't engage in debate? Perhaps you're hoping people will simply get tired and stop rebutting your points?

It is a simple matter of civility for you to respond to those who respond to your posts considering that you're the one who attacked their beliefs to begin with.

This discussion should be framed in the overall context that to do seva is a privilege, and not a right. 
Too many make everything into a right these days.
 
If either a man or woman go # 2 they have to wash before sitting in tabiya. If somehow, someway, it was only women that had to go #2, then the feminists would say that it is wrong to force women to wash before sitting at tabiya. Why? Truth is modern feminism has twisted peoples minds so that if some kind of gandhgi happens only to a woman, it is all of a sudden paviter in their minds! But if this same gandhgi happened to both genders, then they would accept that it is in fact apavitter. Why are women so special that their gandghi is pavitter, but a males is not?
 
2nd point, All sorts of gandhgi come from the body, but I think we can accept that some kinds are worse than others. 
 
3rd, Even with sanitary pads etc, it still is coming out of the body. Similarly, if a man has to wear an adult diaper for incontinence etc, then he is also not able to sit in tabiya. 
 
No double standard here. Just double minded thinking that elevates the female form higher than the male form.

This discussion should be framed in the overall context that to do seva is a privilege, and not a right. 
Too many make everything into a right these days.
 
If either a man or woman go # 2 they have to wash before sitting in tabiya. If somehow, someway, it was only women that had to go #2, then the feminists would say that it is wrong to force women to wash before sitting at tabiya. Why? Truth is modern feminism has twisted peoples minds so that if some kind of gandhgi happens only to a woman, it is all of a sudden paviter in their minds! But if this same gandhgi happened to both genders, then they would accept that it is in fact apavitter. Why are women so special that their gandghi is pavitter, but a males is not?
 
2nd point, All sorts of gandhgi come from the body, but I think we can accept that some kinds are worse than others. 
 
3rd, Even with sanitary pads etc, it still is coming out of the body. Similarly, if a man has to wear an adult diaper for incontinence etc, then he is also not able to sit in tabiya. 
 
No double standard here. Just double minded thinking that elevates the female form higher than the male form.

This discussion should be framed in the overall context that to do seva is a privilege, and not a right. 
Too many make everything into a right these days.
 
If either a man or woman go # 2 they have to wash before sitting in tabiya. If somehow, someway, it was only women that had to go #2, then the feminists would say that it is wrong to force women to wash before sitting at tabiya. Why? Truth is modern feminism has twisted peoples minds so that if some kind of gandhgi happens only to a woman, it is all of a sudden paviter in their minds! But if this same gandhgi happened to both genders, then they would accept that it is in fact apavitter. Why are women so special that their gandghi is pavitter, but a males is not?
 
2nd point, All sorts of gandhgi come from the body, but I think we can accept that some kinds are worse than others. 
 
3rd, Even with sanitary pads etc, it still is coming out of the body. Similarly, if a man has to wear an adult diaper for incontinence etc, then he is also not able to sit in tabiya. 
 
No double standard here. Just double minded thinking that elevates the female form higher than the male form.