Dharma

I also think that Indians are no better. I saw a program recently which said that Brazil was the second most unequal country on earth - India is number one. India is a nation where the sick and the weak sleep and die in the streets. The darwinian caste system is largely to blame. No wonder harijans are trying to convert to other faiths (for which they get slated as traitors). All reformist dharma - Buddhist, Jainism and Sikhi - tried to move towards greater social responsibility. One thing about Abrahamic religions is that they do have some social responsibility at their core. Even Islam has zakat. And I've read that socialism was gaining ground in the early 20th century in the Arab world. It probably appealed to the Muslim mind. Christians also have community spirit and altruism. Communism was an outgrowth of these religions and it has the same pro-people character. Often I notice higher-caste Hindus railing against socialism as if it the cause of all the worlds ills. They scoff at countries like Canada and France (which is a cool thing to do in capitalist America). Imagine if they managed to introduce their societal system to a country like Canada! They would completely ruin it.

Some very interesting comments by Jarnail Singh here (shoe-gate guy who has written the book "I Accuse") http://www.mid-day.com/news/2010/feb/180210-Jarnail-Singh-shoe-gate-incident-Sajjan-Kumar.htm

Just to give a tip - you guys should watch the BBC documentary The Secret Agent about the BNP. It's on youtube. It's not new but it has a lot of useful info in it. It shows one councillor who says their sweet talk about Hindus and Sikhs is just so they can get a few votes from them and appear more plausible while they focus on Muslims. Another councillor says he squirted dog faeces through an Asian takeaway letterbox for several weeks. Griffin also alleges that politically correct police in NW England are victimising whites and letting Asians off the hook (the reality is the opposite). He also says that 500 rioting Asians would teach the police a lesson.

BNP types are extremely hypocritical. According to them every race/ethnic group has a land of origin and should return there...except whites! Their favourite slogan is "a dog born in a stable is still a dog" meaning that non-whites can never be British but the same logic does not apply to whites in North America/Aus/NZ. They often complain "we were never asked" about immigration but think nothing of the changes the English have imposed on others. Still they still think they are the victims of a great injustice resulting in their ethnic group being shafted at the expense of others. They play the race card much more than anyone else as well. These days they compare themselves to the Red Indians of all people! Here is a useful example of what their typical supporter thinks (highlight is mine). Ignore his complaints about the BNP allowing non-whites in because that is the result of legal action rather than change of attitude.

I am not surprised by this either. Though the victims are not women, read about dedovshchina (rule of grandfathers) in the Russian army. Serious brutality.

While Rajinder is singing the praises of these people and painting a rosy picture, this is what they are saying about us. This is a UK poster on a white supremacist forum. Notice that he generalises: "...most indians have an in-built terror that the big, strong,touugh Englishman might turn 'nasty' towards him. Unspoken, but sorely felt." These "I'm alright jack" Indians really do get up my nose. You highlighted some revealing bits anyway dalsingh. He's been to several party meetings and says he never feels awkward in their company. "They treat me normally," he insists. "I feel at home." Shows that wasps who are racist and sadistic can be brilliant at hiding it. When I ask about BNP plans to give "native Britons" preference in the job market, he says this has always been unofficially the case, and spelling it out in law won't make any real difference to the lives of people such as him. So racial discrimination is the norm? BNP would only formalise it?

It can be watched on the Channel 4 website as well. http://www.channel4.com/programmes/young-angry-and-white/4od

Here he is being interviewed by an icy stiff upper lip BNP woman. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgFuKS451dk Spectacular naivety.

This is a half hour Channel 4 documentary about a young BNP supporter. In case anyone missed it, it is repeated on Thursday 18th February 8:30pm on More4. It was quite interesting. It mainly focused on a political solution only type but also showed some hardline guys in masks, hoodies and sunglasses making some menacing statements.

delete - mistake

It's not effed up really. Muslims don't care about anyone else, even if they are shown sympathy. Sikhs should leave there. This is history repeating itself. Persia, Afghanistan, Pakistan - all have the same story. Wherever orthodox Islam becomes widespread the infidels end up being subjugated or fleeing. Muslims will deny that the Quran directs this behaviour by generating confusion around its verses, but Islam has an imperialist vision which works by spreading ideology and it is chauvinistic and bigoted because it declares infidels to be followers of false religions which makes them enemies of Allah, so naturally it is conducive to persecution.

Watch this sullah explaining on TV that apostates should be killed in Islamic states. This guy isn't just anyone - he helps administer Islamic schools in the UK.

I think Islam is Arab imperialism as well however its direct linkage is with Communism not Nazism. Both work by forcing ideology onto people and share an antagonism to other religions/cultures. Commonalities include men of prophet-like status (Mohammad, Marx, Lenin, Mao) who are revered after death like saints, loyal global communities (Ummah and Comintern), and sacred books that act as substitutes for independent thought (Quran, Communist Manifesto and Mao’s little Red Book). Further parallels include the USSR's resemblance to a caliphate, the Iranian leaders calls for world revolution which are similar to Communist rhetoric, the Maoist destruction of Tibetan language and Buddhist shrines which is akin to the Muslim invaders destroying Hindu and Jain mandirs in ancient India, and the Chinese persecution of the Falun Gong which is driven by fear of rival ideologies and is identical in nature to the Mughal hostility towards the Sikh gurus. The father of Nazism was Britishism. Germans were driven by admiration and envy of the British Empire. Also they were influenced by Max Mueller's Aryan Invasion Theory, which was cooked up to divide South Indians and North Indians and to justify British rule, and English gentlemen like Houston Stewart Chamberlain who was a racist Teutonic supremacist who was received well by Germany's conservative elite and was patronised and honoured by Kaiser Wilhelm II. His book was carried in German libraries and included in the school curricula. Even Hitler's hair, moustache and clothing were similar to British officers of that era. Compare his picture on the cover of Mein Kampf to General Dyer.

This is what the subcontinent will be like in a century or two. Muslims have a higher birth-rate than kafirs so tranformation is inevitable. First there is the point of no return where you cannot get rid of them. 15% in India now. Once they are 50% they will start pushing kafirs around and after 75% forced conversions will commence and all kafir culture will vanish. Afghanistan was once a dharmic (Hindu & Buddhist) land. The last place standing was called "Kafiristan" which after attack from multiple sides by Muslims got forcibly converted and renamed Nuristan. Recently the public there demanded an Islamic law that allows them to starve their wives if they object to being raped. I'm sure they know their Islamic scripture very well. Pakistan (once Hindu and Sikh) is the same thanks to overdosing on Islam. Traditionalist Muslims in India are no different to ones anywhere else so I think transformation is inevitable. By the way, Deobandi Islam is influenced by Wahhabi, and the Taliban are a Deobandi & Wahhabi mix. Thanks for the documentary tip anyway. I will record the repeat and watch it.

You are right, it is one of the tricks. Only a minority of racists are overt and visible, most work to enable racism by playing it down or justifying it or blaming the victim, more so in the race law/PC age. Other sly tactics include moral harassment of the victim i.e. constantly finding fault in someone to justify persistent hostility (school and workplace bullying of ethnic minorities is much higher than whites), and also picking individuals or demographic groups off one by one (e.g. much anti-sullah sentiment these days), which is a bit like a big cat separating easy prey from the herd. Note this comment by a trainee in The Secret Policeman documentary. His town is probably a typical UK one and I'd be surprised if the higher classes significantly differ from the working classes. Daley: "Isn’t that what the BNP are now trying to do? PC Rob Pulling: "Exactly. I’m not ******* out of place, I’m not ******* one in a million I am the majority and I think like the majority of my town.

I agree with every word of this.

Churchill hated Indians and non-whites in general. He complained to Leo Amery, Secretary of State for India, "I hate Indians. They are a beastly people with a beastly religion." He said Hindus are a "foul people" and he felt that the Royal Air Force should be deployed "to destroy them". Amery privately noted, "I didn’t see much difference between his outlook and Hitler’s."

I have been looking for proof for this claim but I can't find any. I found the following article in which Baldev Singh says that there is no evidence either for a British offer of an independent Sikh state or Jinnah offering an autonomous state within Pakistan. They both wanted Sikhs to join Pakistan. http://www.sikhspectrum.com/052005/kapur_singh.htm

He's basically attending a thinly disguised klan rally. He is an uncle tom/useful idiot really. I don't mean that in a cruel way, I just hope he wises up. Surely he must have some doubts about them. His reference to Churchill at the end is particulary embarassing because he hated Indians.

Two interesting citation from Mein Kampf about the British: "No nation prepared the way for its commercial conquests more brutally than England did by means of the sword, and no other nation has defended such conquests more ruthlessly." "Such a falsification, however, served the purpose of those who had fabricated it. This caricature of the Englishman, though false, could be used to prove the possibility of conquering the world peacefully by commercial means. Where the Englishman succeeded we should also succeed. Our far greater honesty and our freedom from that specifically English ‘perfidy’ would be assets on our side. Thereby it was hoped that the sympathy of the smaller nations and the confidence of the greater nations could be gained more easily." The British did a nice job of projecting themselves as jolly good fellows who just sip tea and be eccentric and their crimes as unintentional accidents that were not connected to each other and had no doctrinal basis. Brits and Germans did indeed have a great deal in common with each other. The Germans regarded Britain as the exemplar of success because of their doctrine of eliminating 'uncivilised' races who stood in the way of 'progress'. They kept their admiration of British imperial achivements discreet in the 1930s so as not to reveal their ambitions. But during this time they were Anglicizing their society and would later apply British methods in their imperial expansion. The Reich's press carried articles about British statesmen key to expanding the empire and episodes from British imperial history (but no other country's) to educate Germans, for example the Battle of Plassey, and the Fashoda Crisis with France in 1898 where the British were described as "brutal". When the Nazis took control of the Czech Republic in 1939 they made it into a protectorate rather than annexing it outright, something that Germany had never done before. The Czech government remained and President Hacha continued in office. However the country was incorporated into the German Reich and was subject to German laws and people protesting against occupation were shot and their leaders were put into concentration camps and executed. This was a deliberate copy of British rule in the Princely states in India where the maharajas were still on the throne but the British were the real rulers. During the Nazi era Anglo countries were doing the same things as them. Read this book. Native women were being sterilised in Canada and America at the time and as late as in the 1970s. "British Columbia enacted an identical law in 1933, a year before the Nazi government in Germany did. Royce White Calf, a Lakhota judge at the June, 1998 IHRAAM Tribunal in Vancouver,estimates that nearly one-third of all aboriginal women in Alaska and the western United States were sterilized under such programs by the 1980’s, the frequency of these sterilizations actually increasing after 1970. (Royce White Calf to IHRAAM Tribunal, June 13, 1998)." HIDDEN FROM HISTORY: The Canadian Holocaust http://canadiangenocide.nativeweb.org/genocide.pdf Here is a good reference from the book Adolf Hitler: The Definitive Biography by John Toland: "Hitler's concept of concentration camps as well as the practicality of genocide owed much, so he claimed, to his studies of English and United States history. He admired the camps for Boer prisoners in South Africa and for the Indians in the wild west; and often praised to his inner circle the efficiency of America's extermination - by starvation and uneven combat - of the red savages who could not be tamed by captivity." Here's an interesting article about Jesse Owens which tells how Roosevelt refused to shake his hand at the German Olympics because he was afraid that it would cost him white votes in southern states. Who really snubbed Jesse Owens? http://www.rediff.com/sports/2008/aug/19flip.htm And here you can read the forward and introduction from Sarkisyanz's book. Not much but some pretty good info all the same. http://www.atholbooks.org/inspirers

Thanks. I will add a couple of good ones I have. English to Sanskrit: http://spokensanskrit.de English to Hindi: http://www.shabdkosh.com

You know what. I reckon most if not all white people in the country think that the EDL is nothing other than a thinly-disguised p***-bashing organisation.

kdsingh can you say what percentage of Hindus hate Muslims? I understand "missile man" APJ Kalam is widely respected. Most Hindus don't vote BJP either so I thought anti-Muslim feeling was just among a minority. Anyway, I'm not a Khalistani supporter myself, nor do I have anything against Hindus. I quite like Hinduism for the most part (except lack of social responsibility). I don't mind different strains of Sikhi existing and I don't mind if some Hindus say that Sikhi is part of the wider dharmic Hindu family as long as they don't try to finish it. Narendra Modi just said he wants a Jain university to be set up in Gujarat. A Jain business organisation (JITO) asked him to do it. Evidently they don't feel intimidated by RSS people. Modi is cool, he just doesn't seem to like Islam which is a positive quality. If most Muslims can support Congress after 1984 I don't have a problem supporting Modi. India needs such a pro-dharma man leading the nation.

There is a book called Hitler's English Inspirers by Manuel Sarkisyanz which tells how Hitler was a great admirer of England and that he attempted to model Germany's society and empire on it. He was in awe of conventional Englishmen like Churchill and Kipling (rather than just fringe "Fascists") and endeavoured to emulate the cruel, darwinian and white supremacist English Public School system, something that English headmasters took a friendly interest in. I read elsewhere that Hitler wanted educational institutions that moulded students into what he described as "brutal, domineering, fearless, cruel youth" and "beasts of prey". England also provided the inspiration for his policies towards non-Teutons. The mainstream English were very clear on how they had the right to exterminate other races and take over their native lands and this inspired Hitler's ideas for Europe and the USSR. He would refer to conquered areas of the USSR as "our India" (another of Sarkisyanz's books is called From Imperialism to Fascism: Why Hitler's "India" was to be Russia.) It also explains why East Indians were not genocided and replaced like the natives in USA/Canada/Aus/NZ. Here is a synopsis and a Russian language full text of his book. http://www.atholbooks.org/current/sarkisyanz_review.php http://www.gumer.info/bibliotek_Buks/History/sark/index.php

Darby's comment is useful to show any Sikhs who actually believe the BNP bukwas about "we're only against sullay". There is a novel written by a white nationalist called The Turner Diaries. It is about of a revolutionary race war in America. The BNP think the same way, they're just tactful about it. A while back Griffin mentioned that the economic downturn and decline of global oil reserves would trigger upheaval and change. He sees the anti-sullah climate as another window of opportunity. The BNP policy of giving all British people a rifle must be seen in the same light.