Sardar Hari Singh Nalwa - No.1 on the list of greatest conquerors

[paapiman]

Quote

And so we find ourselves at the exclusive number one spot on theBillionaires Newswire list of the greatest conquerors in the history of the world. And the man who resides atop of this list is Hari Singh Nalwa.

Unquote [1]

[1] - http://www.billionairesnewswire.com/10-greatest-conquerors-history-world/4/

 

For full article, please see below.

http://www.billionairesnewswire.com/10-greatest-conquerors-history-world/4/

 

Bhul chuk maaf

[Guest Guest]

These things are subjective. It's difficult to call anyone a top conqueror. The mythology should be explained. Environment both political economic social etc should be taken into account. Love hari Singh personally but objectively he wasn't top ten conqueror especially when he had higher ranked military officers calling the shots and especially when you see that Sikh "rule" in Kabul was ephemeral at best. A 50yr long reign of his king is not qualified as to be mentioned amongst names such as Genghis Khan or Alexander. Others have conquered Afghan territories for much longer periods of time as well and that too at times where pashtuns were not facing attacks from the Western borders from Persia. But ofc NEo Sikhs have no objective analytic skills and are going to argue till death. 

[Guest Guest]

How is hari Singh ranked higher than Timur who defeated Afghans and Indians.... What a joke methodology. 

[paapiman]

Quote

Around 1881, a debate ensued in English and French papers as to who was the most successful military general in the world. Some names which were much talked about then were Napoleon, Marshal Handenberg, Lord Kitchner, General Carbuiser or Duke of Wellington. After mention of the generals from European sub continent, Halaku Khan, Changez Khan, Alaudin of Asia were also counted in. But when the mention of S. Hari Singh Nalwa came, the British writer GW Leitner bowed his head in reverence to the most successful army General of the world. For his ability to triumph over Afghanistan where the British rulers had failed despite unlimited resources of manpower and money available to them. If S. Hari Singh had so much resources, he could have conquered Europe and middle east. He was not only a capable General but an administrator of high caliber, a man of very high and noble character, a scholar, a farsighted person endowed with unique quality of self sacrifice.

Unquote [1]

[1] - http://sahib.tv/?p=1693

 

Bhul chuk maaf

[Guest]

Resources are made available through the spoils of war. And his patron was a maharaja.... Hari Singh nalwa had no shortage of funding. Please learn how to be objective. Hari Singh nalwa didn't do anything other Indians haven't done before. Other Indian generals have defeated Afghans in Afghanistan as well and ruled for much longer as well. In terms of realpolitik hari Singh and his king were just visitors in the annals of history. Maharaja ranjit and the Lahore darbar don't even constitute a dynasty as it only lasted for 50 years. Have some shame you unobjective biased fools. 

[Sajjan_Thug]

3 hours ago, Guest said:

Resources are made available through the spoils of war. And his patron was a maharaja.... Hari Singh nalwa had no shortage of funding. Please learn how to be objective. Hari Singh nalwa didn't do anything other Indians haven't done before. Other Indian generals have defeated Afghans in Afghanistan as well and ruled for much longer as well. In terms of realpolitik hari Singh and his king were just visitors in the annals of history. Maharaja ranjit and the Lahore darbar don't even constitute a dynasty as it only lasted for 50 years. Have some shame you unobjective biased fools. 

Inferiority Complex Much

[Guest]

Lmao really? Sikhs are the ones who lie about history and boost it and make grandiose exaggerations. The world knows that if anyone has an inferiority complex its Sikh people. How do you even come up with that as a rebuttal to simple facts? Patiala has outlived Lahore and in realism that's considered an achievement not something to be looked down upon. It's people like you who come from low families that have no role in history like nigger slaves that try to associate themselves with a kingdom of Lahore even though theyll end up being from doaba or Malwa. You got fudus from kapurtjala and other states all over India acting like they were generals of ranjit Singh. And even ranjit would laugh at you clowns. He married into other Hindu royal families and his son took an oath on the Gita. You fudus are just sheep who run all over the world beating drums for equality and a fair share of white bootlicking. Go praise your colonial climbers and pathetic pseudo scholars. Or maybe you can try to come to proper history professors and cry about your lack of importance. 

 

Every important Sikh family aspires to one thing... To marry royal Hindu family.... That's when they feel assimilated and absorbed into the old money. You fudus arnt even new money. 

[kdsingh80]

7 hours ago, Guest said:

Lmao really? Sikhs are the ones who lie about history and boost it and make grandiose exaggerations. The world knows that if anyone has an inferiority complex its Sikh people. How do you even come up with that as a rebuttal to simple facts? Patiala has outlived Lahore and in realism that's considered an achievement not something to be looked down upon. It's people like you who come from low families that have no role in history like nigger slaves that try to associate themselves with a kingdom of Lahore even though theyll end up being from doaba or Malwa. You got fudus from kapurtjala and other states all over India acting like they were generals of ranjit Singh. And even ranjit would laugh at you clowns. He married into other Hindu royal families and his son took an oath on the Gita. You fudus are just sheep who run all over the world beating drums for equality and a fair share of white bootlicking. Go praise your colonial climbers and pathetic pseudo scholars. Or maybe you can try to come to proper history professors and cry about your lack of importance. 

 

Every important Sikh family aspires to one thing... To marry royal Hindu family.... That's when they feel assimilated and absorbed into the old money. You fudus arnt even new money. 

All religions lie about history, there is hardly anything new in it.Hinduism that is practiced today is far from what it really was

[Guest guest]

On 25/03/2016 at 3:15 AM, Guest Guest said:

How is hari Singh ranked higher than Timur who defeated Afghans and Indians.... What a joke methodology. 

thats a different guest guest!  I would never praise Timur.

[Guest guest]

9 hours ago, Guest said:

Lmao really? Sikhs are the ones who lie about history and boost it and make grandiose exaggerations. The world knows that if anyone has an inferiority complex its Sikh people. How do you even come up with that as a rebuttal to simple facts? Patiala has outlived Lahore and in realism that's considered an achievement not something to be looked down upon. It's people like you who come from low families that have no role in history like nigger slaves that try to associate themselves with a kingdom of Lahore even though theyll end up being from doaba or Malwa. You got fudus from kapurtjala and other states all over India acting like they were generals of ranjit Singh. And even ranjit would laugh at you clowns. He married into other Hindu royal families and his son took an oath on the Gita. You fudus are just sheep who run all over the world beating drums for equality and a fair share of white bootlicking. Go praise your colonial climbers and pathetic pseudo scholars. Or maybe you can try to come to proper history professors and cry about your lack of importance. 

 

Every important Sikh family aspires to one thing... To marry royal Hindu family.... That's when they feel assimilated and absorbed into the old money. You fudus arnt even new money. 

inferiority complex confirmed.

[Guest]

Sure buddy, whatever you say. You guys are JOKES. You don't have to love Hitler or Timur to know they were great conquerors and you don't have to love Timur to know he was a much better conqueror than Hari Singh. Inferiority complex is for you people who can't even read without being imbued with irrational sentiments and overwhelmed by passion. You need to be able to scrutinize before you can start yelling out "inferiority complex" as a rebuttal or defense. In your case it's more a defense since you can't detach yourself from the content. Pathetic fools. 

[Guest gurjant]

remember som nath son? your ancestors got raped en masse bruv wake up, foreign people ruled you for 1200 years, 50 years of self rule has made you so arrogant

muslims used to spit in your ancestors mouth (its a fact)

[Guest]

Remember the fact that they were also your ancestors, son? And read a little more history. There hasn't been 1200 years of foreign rule. You are a typical bucket. Read into every invaders history. Even abdali had local allies. Every invader had local allies that used foreign intervention to secure local dominance. But again, you fudus wouldn't know so much as you listen to gr2 dropout granthis. Perhaps it's you that should remember that most Sikhs were actually maroosis of sikh and non sikh kings. No Hindu lies about Muslim invasions its Sikhs and uneducated fools like you who lie about your own. 

[Guest]

1. There is no objective "muslim". Sher shah suri was allied with Hindu kings as were the mughals. Sher shah suris grandson was hakim khan suri who fought under maharana pratap. 

2. Dogras and hari Singh nalwa enslaved 20,000 Pathan women. Most women in Indian darbars that were nautch girls were Muslims. 

3. Pathanias, chauhans and bappa rawal, and kuchwahas l, bhadoriya etc have fought and defeated Afghans in Afghanistan and held it under the mughal banner for longer than ranjit Singh's rule existed let alone how long he ruled Kabul. 

4. Muslims also consist of people like dhulla bhatti and other rajputs like raikot. Raikot helped your guru I wonder where the omnipotent Sikhs were.... Nowhere. Don't forget that the guru got refuge at several Hindu houses. 

5. Sikhs come from Hindus and only a few jatt families that are khalistani or neo Sikh wouldn't marry into Hindu families, for the most part, most noble jatt families intermarry with Hindus. Yet they treat other Sikhs like inferior scum as they are from lower classes like most jatts.

6. Sikhs come from Hindus. You literally had Hindu parents donating their sons to khalsa a good example is Raipur rani. Perhaps you should also realize that Lahore darbar is fought with Naga sadhus at kunbh mela over bathekng rites as the contest was about who is the purer hindu that should bathe first. These same nagas routed abdali at Mathura and then he sacked harimandir sahib too bad armed sikhs couldn't do the same thing a few thousand naked sadhus did.. 

Abdali himself called Marathas the bravest and strongest force he hadencountered... A clear contradiction of sikh self aggrandisement. 

7. Iv posted many other historical occurrences here before. Read them and learn something. There were only a few kings who were Muslim and tried to rule over Hindus without Hindu support. Akbar didn't rule Hindus as a ghazi... HD ruled as an ally who prayed to Hindi gods and even dara shikho was a rebel to aruangzeb. Your own guru has attested to the fact that rajputs and Marathas defeated mughals.

 

Rana bhim Singh destroyed many mosques as well. 

 

[Guest]

If you can't talk about history properly then don't. Bringing up examples of Muslim tyranny apply to Sikh as well. Sikh women got raped by Muslims as well. Many Hindu women did Sati in numbers that outweigh Sikh sacrifices in wars. 20,000 hindu women did Sati at one occasion. That's a ghallugara for you and a typical fight for us. You came a few hundred years ago and joined the fight in the last minutes like the US in WW2. Hindus have been fighting internal and external enemies for centuries.