Sikher Posted April 21, 2004 Report Share Posted April 21, 2004 Has any one here actually met an Udasis? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kam1825 Posted April 21, 2004 Report Share Posted April 21, 2004 yes there is an udasi his name is bhai abhinashi who came to leicester for two weeks about two months ago and did some relly good katha at the gurdwaras 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Javanmard Posted April 21, 2004 Report Share Posted April 21, 2004 Plenty of them! Fantastic people apart from Swami Anantanand! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Khalsa Fauj Posted November 25, 2004 Report Share Posted November 25, 2004 SGPC has clearly stated that udaasis are not Sikhs. They are anit-Sikhs. Tehy are a sect of Hindus. They believe in hindu devis and devtaas. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 25, 2004 Report Share Posted November 25, 2004 SGPC has clearly stated that udaasis are not Sikhs. They are anit-Sikhs. Tehy are a sect of Hindus. They believe in hindu devis and devtaas. You should get your facts straight. What the SGPC say Udasis are Sikhs, says SGPC chief http://www.tribuneindia.com/2002/20021210/main7.htm 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Khalsa Fauj Posted November 25, 2004 Report Share Posted November 25, 2004 What happened to hukamnama issued before 1980? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Khalsa Fauj Posted November 25, 2004 Report Share Posted November 25, 2004 Badungar sued to go to bhaniyarawala. Who is he to run the show? He must be declared tankahiaya as well. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 25, 2004 Report Share Posted November 25, 2004 What happened to hukamnama issued before 1980? Can you post hakumnama or scan a copy of it that is taken before 1980 that clearly states udasi are not Sikhs??? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Khalsa Fauj Posted November 25, 2004 Report Share Posted November 25, 2004 I will see if I can get it and scan it as i don't have a scanner. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Khalsa Fauj Posted November 25, 2004 Report Share Posted November 25, 2004 Maryada says that those who onl believe in 10 Gurus and 11th Guru Guru Granth Sahiba re Sikhs. Sikhh must take Amrit also. Do udasisi do that? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Khalsa Fauj Posted November 25, 2004 Report Share Posted November 25, 2004 Akal Takht maryada says no other granth must be placed at same level beside Guru Grnath Sahib Ji. What do udasis do? Badungar say what badala says, badal says what his boyfriends advani and vajpai say. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 25, 2004 Report Share Posted November 25, 2004 I personally will follow Sachkhand Hazoor Sahib Maryada anyday instead of maryada created by SGPC Malech heretics who are now unfortunately in control of "Siri Akaal Takth Sahib". 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Khalsa Fauj Posted November 25, 2004 Report Share Posted November 25, 2004 RSS and Shiv Sena and VHP and other brahmnicala gencies control Hajoor Sahib and Patna Sahib. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 25, 2004 Report Share Posted November 25, 2004 RSS and Shiv Sena and VHP and other brahmnicala gencies control Hajoor Sahib and Patna Sahib. Hazoor Sahib Maryada is known to be 70 percent puratan than british influenced SGPC. Get over it the regular Sikh Blowing trumphet of oh you are rss, oh you are vhp just because they have slightly different beleif than others. I think panth endagers such people who lack tolerance and acceptance when it comes to diversity in Sikhi. They need to be destroyed by pen . :evil: :evil: :evil: 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tSingh Posted November 26, 2004 Report Share Posted November 26, 2004 Recently, a couple of years ago, Vedanti made a declaration as Jathedar that Udasis are Sikhs. It was in the tribune. I may have it saved, but I'm sure if you use their search engine. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tSingh Posted November 26, 2004 Report Share Posted November 26, 2004 Udasis are Sikhs, says SGPC chief Varinder Walia Tribune News Service Amritsar, December 9 The Dharam Prachar Committee (DPC) of the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC) has declared that Nirmal and Udasi sects were an integral part of Sikhism. The SGPC has decided to challenge the decision of the Supreme Court which pronounced that ‘udasi deras’ were not gurdwaras. The SGPC chief, Prof Kirpal Singh Badungar who presided over the meeting said he had instructed his staff to get an approved copy of the Supreme Court verdict so that it could be challenged. In another development the Dharam Prachar Committee has decided that new gurdwaras could be built only with the prior permission of the Jathedar, Akal Takht. This decision has been taken to check the mushrooming of non-historical or unauthorised Sikh shrines. Professor Badungar, however, said no gurdwara on caste basis would be allowed. For this purpose, the SGPC would approach the Jathedar of Akal Takht, Giani Joginder Singh Vedanti shortly. Professor Badungar said the SGPC would advise Mr Joginder Singh Panjrath, an SGPC member facing charges of visiting the dera of Ashutosh, to appear before Akal Takht to prove his innocence. He claimed that Mr Panjrath was innocent and his picture was super-imposed on that of dera of Ashutosh by tricks of photography. He said the SGPC would also advise Mr Panjrath to file case for the manipulation of his photograph. The SGPC also took serious note of the challan of the vehicles driven by Sikh women/girls not wearing helmets. He said instead of implementing the orders, the state government should have challenged the orders keeping in view the sentiments of the Sikh community. He said the SGPC would contest the orders in a court. The DPC has also decided to constitute a monitoring cell of Sikh intellectuals to check the distortion in Sikh history if any. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sardar Moderator Singh Posted November 26, 2004 Report Share Posted November 26, 2004 The origins and other aspects of the Udasis are being ACADEMICALLY discussed here:- http://www.sikhawareness.com/sikhawareness...opic.php?t=5757 Please contribute if you can manage to do so without getting into the usual emotional "SIKH" state (this applies to both the Sanatanists and others) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tSingh Posted November 26, 2004 Report Share Posted November 26, 2004 self-edited - crap joke 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Khalsa Fauj Posted November 26, 2004 Report Share Posted November 26, 2004 Tomorrow badal controlled sgpc will issue a statement that SAnt Jarnail SIngh Ji was an enemy of SIkhs and rss are real SIkhs. Will you agree to that? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Javanmard Posted November 26, 2004 Report Share Posted November 26, 2004 Well the only reqson SGPC is sayin this is becquse they want to cnfiscate Udasi property. It's just all about money... as usual!!! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Khalsa Fauj Posted November 26, 2004 Report Share Posted November 26, 2004 Why do Udasis exist? For what? Parchar? They should look at themselves and see if they are saabt soorat. They are there for money too. Living on free land. I have met udasis, there was one udasi, he was a real good guy though. The guy always told me to meet him when i went to the neighbrouing village or sometimes going to Gurudwara Punj Tahlia. This gurudwara is related to Guru Tegh Bahadur Ji. Guru Ji placed five pieces of old tahli tree into the ground to tie the horses and they grew into trees. there is also a well of Mata Gurjri Ji and if you look carefully into the water, you can see the water is moving like if it was in a river. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Javanmard Posted November 26, 2004 Report Share Posted November 26, 2004 Good to see that you recognise that not all Udasis are evil!!! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Khalsa Fauj Posted November 26, 2004 Report Share Posted November 26, 2004 Udasis don't call themselves Sikhs. They just callthemselves Udasi Sadhu. Go talk to one. This is what they have called themselves int he past. I don't know if they are trying to call themselves Sikhs now. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Javanmard Posted November 26, 2004 Report Share Posted November 26, 2004 Well if you don't know then shut up!!! I do know many Udasis such as Mahant Mangal Das who are proud to be Sikhs!!!! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Khalsa Fauj Posted November 26, 2004 Report Share Posted November 26, 2004 Das? I thought you believed in the Khalsa concept. You say others don't believe in Khalsa concept and on the other hand follow mahunts. Remeber they were kicked out. Their guru naraynu was a pimp and had a marrasan in Darbar Sahib. It was these udasis who did beadbi of Guru Granth Sahib Ji by writing oam and swastika on many saroops. I twas these guys who sucked up to British. e.g. mahant narayan daas. advani says he is proud to be SIkh too. IS he even a Sikh? Sikhi is khanneoh Tikhi Vaalhoh Nikkki masunds = mahunts same job free food and fooling people 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.