paapiman

Answer the simple question: So which maryada will you follow - old so-called SRM or the latest so-called SRM? If you say you follow Akal takht, you are indirectly implying that the initial draft of the so-called SRM had an error. It's simple - Sikhism or Akal takht, controlled by SGPC/Punjab government? Bhul chuk maaf

Even 3 Gurbanis, which are used in amrit ceremony, are from Sri Dasam Granth Sahib jee. If you don't consider them as guru-roop, then you should not believe in Amrit Sanchaar then. Bhul chuk maaf

Well, an ex-SGPC member said that they have changed Sri Rehraas Sahib, from the one in 1940's (when the so-called SRM was formulated). The one published now, is different from the original one. So if SGPC removes Sri Jaap Sahib, Sri Chaupai Sahib, etc from the nitnaym --- will you still follow them? Do you want to follow GOD or a bunch of scholars? Bhul chuk maaf

Answer the question: Do you know that Sri Rehraas Sahib jee has been changed 'x' (can someone please state the number) number of times since the inception of the so-called SRM. So which maryada will you follow - old so-called SRM or the latest so-called SRM? Bhul chuk maaf

What about Nanaksar, Udhasis? The fact is that it is not a panthic maryada. It has been forced on the panth, by some people as they had power during that time (SGPC had taken control of many gurudwaras). Do you know that Sri Rehraas Sahib jee has been changed 'x' (can someone please state the number) number of times since the inception of the so-called SRM. So which maryada will you follow - old so-called SRM or the latest so-called SRM? Bhul chuk maaf

If Daas gets time, Gurparsaad will comment on the points above. Bhai Kaan Singh Nabha did not even believe in complete SSGSJ. How can a Sikh completely follow him? Not 100% sure (can someone confirm this) --Two great sects did not show up (DDT and Nanaksar). How can a Sikh compeltely follow it? Bhul chuk maaf

Where did Sikhkhoj show that? Can you please provide the link? It's simple - Sikhism or Sri Akal takht Sahib, which is currently being controlled by SGPC/Punjab government? Obviously, most Gurudwaras are under SGPC control, therefore the so-called SRM has been enforced on them, which has influenced many people. Anyways, majority is not always right. Even, Wahabi ideology has taken control over Muslim shrines in Saudi Arabia, even though Wahab was born, 1000+ years after Prohphet Muhammad. Bhul chuk maaf

Quote Researchers at Brown University and the University of Arizona have determined that variations of three different genes in the brain (called single-nucleotide polymorphisms) may help predict a person’s tendency to make certain choices. Unquote [1] [1] - http://psychcentral.com/news/2009/07/21/genetic-influence-on-behavior/7237.html Daas is not a scholar, so won't be able to provide detailed information. If someone can provide more details on the effect of race/caste on a human mind, that would be great. Bhul chuk maaf

It's not my idea. It is mentioned in the DDT RM, the taksaal started by the tenth master himself. Bhul chuk maaf

Bro, you have a good point, but you are talking from an environmental perspective. Daas never said that only caste has an effect on human mind. There might be several other factors too, which effect a person's thinking. Sangat is a big one too. Bhul chuk maaf

If a woman does not bow to her husband, it does not mean that she is affected by feminism, but if one refers to a Gurmat principle as degrading, then something is wrong. Bhul chuk maaf

Gender equality is unscientific. Gurparsaad, I will be starting a new post on it. Bhul chuk maaf

Bhul chuk maaf Like this

Non-Sikhs have full rights to defend Sikhism. Her thinking (regarding gender equality) is anti-Sikh. It is more towards feminism, than Sikhism. Bhul chuk maaf

Has he done the complete katha of SSGGSJ? Bhul chuk maaf Bro, what you said, applies to other things too, not just katha. Bhul chuk maaf

One has full rights to disagree to a certain concept, but to say it's degrading, is pretty bad. Quote Im not even going to get into this again about seeing husband as God. It's degrading. Unquote The above statement is clearly an attack on a Gurmat principle and also looks down upon all those great Gursikh Sati women, who looked upon their husbands as a demi-God. We are on a Sikh forum, not a feminist or a non-Sikh one. Bhul chuk maaf

They seem weird. What do u say? I think, we should stick to historical pictures. Did you find the verse, who were looking for? Bhul chuk maaf

Caste has some impact on a person's thinking. We cannot deny this fact (similar to gender equality, which is unscientific). One's genes and blood definitely have some impact on a person's behavior and habits. Taking amrit is the first (and mandatory) step to move ahead towards Satguru jee, but it does take tremendous amount of bhagtee and simran to get rid of differences (duality) in the mind. Srimaan Sant Baba Mahaharnaam Singh jee Maharaaj Buchonwale used to ask people their caste, when they used to come to meet him. I guess, the updesh would be slightly different to people, of different castes. For example, on average Pathans and Rajputs are brave; Bhappe are good at business; Chamars are simple minded, etc. Therefore, it makes sense to recognize the differences in castes and use certain positive qualities in a person, to move him ahead in spirituality. Having said the above, no discrimination must be done, based on caste. Bhul chuk maaf

Bro, do you know, if the full katha of Sri Dasam Granth Sahib jee is available online? Thanks Bhul chuk maaf

Can someone please tell from their personal experiences, how many hours has one listened to katha in a day? How is 4-5 hours in a day? Thanks Bhul chuk maaf Waheguru jee kaa Khalsa Waheguru jee kee Fateh

Hatred is a bad disease. Bhul chuk maaf

One so-called problem in DDT RM vs many problems in so-called SRM. Bhul chuk maaf

If someone can summarize all the problems associated with the so-called SRM in details, that would be great. Bhul chuk maaf

Will discuss this in a separate topic. Bhul chuk maaf