The Khalsa Fauj

Some of you just don't understand. This is what happens when you are under influence of sukha. Guys, Sukha is not good. It is a bajar kurehat. Don't take it. When the girls dance and shake their butts while dancing. How can those people be called Gurmukhs. Isn't that wrong. I bet those who dance don't even know they are they are sticking their butts out. They get too much into it. Do you think Sahibzadas danced? No they did not. So why should we? Even Sant Jarnail Singh said that we should not dance. There is no point in dancing. It does give lust, whether you get it rigth away or a couple days after. Also, many assault happen at these so called dances.

sikhknowledge.tk

Read te post again. Where does it say women who dance are kanzris. Open your eyes. Maybe too much sukha.

That is because of brahmanvaad. Nothing more. Evil people have crept into SGPC so people don't like it. Ego is the biggest factor of all. Your egos get in the way so you guys make your own maryada according to your own beliefs. Simple as that.

The thing is that the puratan SInghs called dancing as an act of a kanzri so we are not suposed to dance.

Well, how about the Akal Takht maryada. Do you guys follow that? Badungar was caught going to piara bhaniaarawala and jagir kaur is in courts for killing daughter so I don't have to lsiten to them. They distributed drugs like bhung, liquor, opium, etc. and got elected so I don't accept them as leaders of the panth. Now I will answer your questions: a) the SGPC-elected Jathedar of the Akal Takht is bringing Sikhs into 'brahmanvad'? Yes, it is true. E.g. Gur Bilaas Paatshahi 6. However, Jathedar didn't say Udasis are Sikhs in the news. It was only badungar and his budddies. the 'Panth' is run by someone else other than the SGPC? SGPC runs the Panth so.... c) the Akal Takht - the mainstream Sikhs seat of authority, is wrong? Akal Takht has the highest authority. I follow that but do you? Do you follow Akal Takht maryada? Do you know taking sukha is wrong accordign to Sikh religion? d) the Akal Takht is 'anti-Gurmat'? Akal Takht is never anti-Gurmat. People runnning it, oh yes! They can be wrong. They are wrong. Our Jathedar has no mardana taakat to stand up and tell the truth. He does what his boss badal says. Poor jathedar Akal Takht. He couldn't say a word in front of Prof. Darshan Singh in New York. Did you know Prof. Darshan SIngh Ji resigned instead of following these manmukhs and performing anti-gurmat acts? http://sgpc.net/rehat_maryada/section_one.html Do udasis live up to this maryada. This maryada wasn't made by badungar or his budddies. It was made by the whole Panth. SGPC is not Panth.

Khalsa soo-aye Jo Pardarisht Tiaagai, Khalsa sooo-aye jo pur naaree tay bhaagai.

That is why we don't listen to bhaga, watch those sexually explicit videos, magazines, etc.

Udasis can in way be called Sikhs. Why? They believe in hindu devis and devtas and cut their hair. They also call Guru Nanak Ji as incarnation of Vishnu. These are all anti-Gurmat tactics to bring Sikhism back into brahmanvaad.

Which retired police officer are you talking about? Dasam Granth issue is not new. It has been here ever since its existance.

Banda was given Amrit and was renamed Gurbax Singh. Amrit is taken when you are ready to live up to the standards but maryada is for everyone who wants to call him/her a Sikh. Kurehits are kurehits. You don't commit them. Cutting hair is a kurehit so it is totally wrong. Don't do it.

All good.

par tria bhogay, , sir munaaaye, hukka peevay, kutha khaa-aye eh kurehtaan vudeean chaar, jo kray so hoo-ee khuaar

Teh above reference is not comparable to chariters. Naamdaiv is just tellign how much he loves Akaal because people who love sex, thats all they think about. People who love Akaal, thats all they think about. Chariters are totally different from the meaning behind the above verse. Namdaiv is not teling us to get into kaam. Okay.

download the whole steek in pdf format fom www.sikhnet.com

Dasam Granth was not even compiled during Guru Gobind Singh Ji's time. Then how can you say it is all authentic. Answer this question, chariter says anoop kour was given 60 coins before Guru Ji left her house after she was drugged up. Then it says she was given 20000 when she brought the shoes back. What type of Gurbani is this? What lesson is learned here? Give money to people who want to have intercourse?

I don't care about kala or kali. I have never read any of his books but a fact is a fact. I never said all of dasam granth is the work of brahmans. what are your questions about amrit sanchar? We want to have the real dasam granth. We want to have one maryada for every Sikh so we have unity. These other deravad maryadas are causing division. No wonder brahmans take advantage of us.

Answer the questions. Simple as that. Answer the questions i posted yesterday and thequestions i posted before. It is easy to bash bash bash but hard to answer questions. If you are correct, then please answer the questions. There is no point wasting time bashing each other. A Sikh is a Sikh. kala afgana is not the first one to oppose dasam granth. Until the egos don't go away, nothing will be solved. Blind ego only leads to falsehood. Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh

i don't speak shit but i know some people here who love shit.

Bhai banno wali bir was rejected by Guru Ji and called khari bir and no parkash was doen of it.

except sant samaj, some uneducated scholars, a couple of bought out scholars and some others who have never read dasam granth are the only ones who say dasam granth is gurbani.

Look at the data, Buddism is not growing, at oen time, it was the religion of the world. Look at them now. 3rd place, they will be in 4th place soon. Kesar Singh chibber. How do you know that those are the actual rehatnamas from him? How do you they have not been messed around with? Also one proof is not enough. Also, if dasam granth is real, then why has there been a debate on it ever since its existence? If dasam granth is not guru then why is it placed at same level as Guru Granth Sahib Ji? How can you say durgaa is not worshipped? durgaa paath banaa-aieaa jin eh gaa-aiea fir naa jooni aa-ehaa is this not praising durgaa? what does jai jai hoasee mehkhasur murdan from akal ustat have to do with akaal? also it is not present in the so called bhai mani singh beer? is it not true? if yes then who added and why added? sukha singh was a granthi at patna and was a devotee of durgaa, he added it

The letter you are talking about were proven to be from early 1800s. The leeter have the use of Aadhuk, bindi and the words are not connnected. There is only one version of Guru Granth Sahib Ji. There is only debate about raagmaala. Nothing else, if yes what? As for speelings, it is possible to make a mistake or 2. There is no debate on what is bani and what is not except raagmaala. What benefit am I going to have from this? What benefit? As for these dasam granth followers, their benefit is fooling people, making them join, them and build deras so they could live richly without moving a leaf.

The letter you are talking about were proven to be from early 1800s. The leeter have the use of Aadhuk, bindi and the words are not connnected. There is only one version of Guru Granth Sahib Ji. There is only debate about raagmaala. Nothing else, if yes what? As for speelings, it is possible to make a mistake or 2. There is no debate on what is bani and what is not except raagmaala. What benefit am I going to have from this? What benefit? As for these dasam granth followers, their benefit is fooling people, making them join, them and build deras so they could live richly without moving a leaf.

I don't know if they exist or not. I have never seen them. Who cares about ghosts. I want to see UFOs.