kdsingh80

This is typical Feminist mentality , Us vs them . Men and women are not competing , they are interdependent on each other , Physically mentally they are way apart from each other. Men are naturally more aggressive and that makes them violent aggressors as well very good defenders. BTW you have excellent justification for RSS and other religions who want to attack muslims. Since muslims are aggressors from past 14 centuries , there is nothing wrong killing and attacking muslims , after all other religions have also learnt best violent aggressive way to spread like islam .They also learnt it from the best-Islam

So what solution you have, It is not India the whole developing world is suffering from chronic unemployment , poverty etc There are no quick fix solution to this problem . and with more advancement of technology , use of robots , driverless cars this problem will keep on increasing. India started exactly what you are saying , we are poor we are starving nation , we will not allow private industry , we will not spend on technology , result it pushed India into much more backwardness , while Indian population exploded and poverty was not eliminated

What about the people? They can keep reproducing , despite knowing they don't have food they keep on reproducing expecting Govt to feed them.

What it mean's , Yogi bhajan bought few white's into Sikhism which are called 3HO and still many don't accept them as sikhs, so far in terms of percentage they are negligible

I think we had already discussed that , whatever Government invested ,ISRO is now giving back 2-3 times to Govt.Whether the money goes to poor or not is different issue

How people who were mocking India for Mangalyaan didn't realise that ISRO is now doing brisk business

The biggest problem sikhism is facing low birth rate. Lack of sikhs marrying , inter religious marriages are taking heavy toll on Sikhism. Unfortunately most of sikhs have completely turned blind eye toward this , All they want is Raaj , power etc. The future is quite bleak in terms of demographics

I started this thread and I don't believe in any superiority of sikhism at Hinduism at present , Infact Sikhs these days going toward status of religions like Jains and parsi' who were always dependent on majority community. Studying and discussing history does not mean one is degrading another religion

People say all kind of weird things.As far trusting is concerned you have to trust people in life , there is not other option , not saying blind trust .But even in bigger things like Marriage , business , you have to trust, there is no option ਖ਼ਸਮ ਦੁਸ਼ਮਨੀ ਗਰ ਹਜ਼ਾਰ ਆਵੁਰਦ ॥ ਨ ਯਕ ਮੂਇ ਊ ਰਾ ਅਜ਼ਾਰ ਆਵੁਰਦ ॥੧੧੧॥ Khhasama Dushamanee Gara Hazaar Aavurada ॥ Na Yaka Mooei Aoo Raa Azaar Aavurada ॥111॥ ख़सम दुशमनी गर हज़ार आवुरद ॥ न यक मूइ ऊ रा अज़ार आवुरद ॥१११॥ The enemy may try to give a thousand blows, but he cannot harm even one hair, (if God is friendly).111. 2067712 ਦਸਮ ਗਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ : ਪੰਨਾ ੧੪੭੭ ਪੰ. ੧੨ https://www.searchgurbani.com/dasam_granth/page/1477 If harm of any of the member here is written by you or me. Notthing can protect him or her, if not no matter how many bad people join this forum nothing will happen to them

Good to see you back Gurpreet , some people were saying that you left forum along with Satkiran lol

great collection, Thanks for sharing it

Its working from my side , please try again, its her website http://martyrsofmarriage.com/?page_id=19

You can contact this lady https://www.facebook.com/deepika.bhardwaj She is fighting against these type of cases where Girl just put fake case on husband and in laws, your story will reach thousands of people across India and abroad

Thanks , this proves my point that whenever merit based system was applied fully then the army was more successful against muslims

No it was Shivaji that allowed upper and lower caste to fight for him , result he was most successful ruler against muslims. You seem to be completely ignore the fact that Hiindu's and muslims' societies are very different , the birth based rigidity is only found in Hinduism , not in Islam, Let me ask you 1 question why always whenever Hiondu's and muslims coexisted , it always resulted in extinction of Hindu's. There are video's by Hindu's who claim that Hindu's are now only in barely 20% of area which they had prior to islam, caste was not the only factor in Hindu society losing but IT WAS CERTAINLY ONE OF THE FACTOR Read the above which I posted in another thread , Muslim society was so merit based that even slaves could reach higher position, can you say that Hindu Society was also the same? Untouchable despite being kicked out remained part of Hinduism , there birth , death ceremonies were conducted according to Hindu system, They worshipped Hindu , gods and goddesses. Despite movements from past 100 years majority of Dalits still are in Hinduism .So indirectly they were part of Hinduism. Your comparision about someone suffering from disease was untouchable is not true. Most of people at that suffering from infectious diseases use to die, they could hardly produce children , so they can never from a society especially when they were poor and without resources Even criminal argument is not fully true because people don't oppress criminals they are afraid , while Dalits were oppressed. Also not to forget that they conducted some of the most menial jobs like skinning , manual scavenging etc which are seen by society as extremely dirty , this is the reason they were considered as outcaste and not because of disease or criminality

Another good article mentioning the points Why Hindu's got defeated

I have read it 3 times. It looks you have not understood what I am saying. Society A is consists of Hindu's where 20 are born warriors , while 30 with difficulty can become warriors and the remaining with extreme difficulty can be accepted as warrior.On the other hand Society B also had same set up but Once the call of Jihad was give all of 100 can be accepted as warrior , so in conflict Society B had definate advantage. BTW Maratha king Shivaji is great example how caste was a factor. He employed soldiers from all castes and as result Maratha power grew , but once the power again fell into the hands of Peshwa's they introduced caste system strictly and kicked Mahar's out , the same Mahar's were employed by Britishers and then they defeated Peshwa . Dalits are only found in Hinduism , Society B islam don't have any untouchables , you can give as many weird justification of caste system like diseases criminals etc , but the fact remain a large part of Hindu society was unable to contribute even in wars , which definately was afactor which goes against Hindu society

@BhagatSingh So you are saying Indian society never discriminated on the basis of caste? All that caste based discrminations are fantasies ? These Mahar Dalits must be naive to side with Britishers, they should had accepted their lower status.Even though I agree with your argument that many zamindars used to keep armies .But still you have to accept Islam has much better brotherhood than Hindu's who always used to see everything through the eyes of caste.Recently there was big bollywood film " Baji rao Mastani" and It has shown that How the one of the most influential Peshwa Baji Rao was unable to raise his son as Hindu because her mother's mother was muslim , such was rigidity of Indian caste system. And BTW The great Hindu epic Mahabharat is clear example of How few like Karna or Eklavya has real difficulty becoming warriors because they did not belong to Kshatriya caste. So yes theoritically you have written good post , but you forgot that in Hindu society , lower castes had to show their extreme effort to be accepted as warriors even then untouchable castes hardly had any chance to be accepted as warriors because they were the lowest. , while in Islam anybody could become Allah's soldier.

If there are 2 societies with 100 people each , A and B . Society A only allow its warrior caste whose numbers are 20 people to fight , while the society B just accept anybody on the basis of merit. One don't need rocket science to accept that in conflict Society B has huge advantage So I will willingly read why those muslim rulers lost , what's wrong in analsys. One point that comes in my mind is that India always made people more Araam pasand rather keeping upto date with war strategies and innovations

I don't have problem reading that sikhs lost the battle because of casteism , if there is element of truth in that I have read and will read , but the fact remain Rajputs lost against muslim invaders , this fact is not going to be changed.Mughals too lost in 18th century badly but I have not seen muslims getting angry on that .Rajputs had Glorious history and they managed to kept islam out of India upto Ghaznavi , but after that they lost , which is fact and that is not going to change

All you can do is abuse. The articles clearly mention battle strategies of Rajputs and others, clearly invaders were winners in it

check this

What a Singh, what superhuman strength

Interesting read , Scholars of ICF what was use to battle strategy of Sikhs after they gained some number? The first if I am not wrong was ambushing

This article looks , like written by some barbaric tribal. Foreign investers are looters , Chinese men raping Ethopian girls , looks like typical communist stuff. The author needs to know China became so economically successful because Europe , USA heavily invested in it, no doubt few corrupt also come in country and take advantage