Maha Kharag Singh

admin cut

power of rudra ie the most fearful form of shiva

YOUR THE MOST SELFISH PERSON I CAN EVER THINK OF WHEN IT COMES TO SEVA!!!!!!!!!! HOW COULD YOU PUT SOMETHING ELSE BEFORE YOUR COMMITMENT TOWARDS YOUR GURU?!!!!!!!

i dont find anything funny. some people believe that Satguru Gobind Singh Ji has rudra shakti

legend has that if an aghori swears at you, its for your own good luck if you dont take it to heart. Their blessings are in their swearing. as for wahegurubol, calling someones beliefs non sense is pindu unpartha. get some nimarta, and for the record they dont worship skulls, they carry them with them along with adorning bhasma ang to be reminded of the constant shroud of death which looms over everyone.

THAT IS THE MOST SELFISH THING THAT I HAVE EVER HEARD IN MY LIFE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Seva is above everything and anything, your Seva is worth ten times the gun of attending the rehnsabai. If attending the rehnsabai will put vigan in your seva then dont bother attending.

i pity the fool who made that blog

erm i dont think so. Where there is naam da partaap these things perish, as i said use naam as your sword and seva as your dhaal and kill the heathens!

the thread tying is a traditional guru-shishya thing, and there is nothing wrong with it. He is a Guru, Granth Sahib Ji Maharaj is SATGURU there is a big difference, me you or any tom dickj and harry can be a guru but there is only one Satguru and that is Granth Sahib Ji Maharaaj i myself have never heard him do nindya of bhai balbir singh ji, and as per the Maharaagi Avtar Singh Ji he disagrees with him on some gurmat sangeet issues such as posture when holding a certain instrument etc that my friend is not nindya. So what if he des sangat with Niddar Singh tera tedh dukhda? ta je teinu baali problem ya, ill give you his number you can talk to him direct how does that sound

the best thing you can do is ardaas, and beat these entities with naam, when you see them fight the admin cut with a sword made of naam and a dhaal made of seva

go see a dera baba or a taantrik tere te kisse ne jadu tona kitha ya.

itsabout time but i doubt anything will be resolved, ie the balbir singh jathedari case

aja bass teri kammi si, ive seen many yogis smoke and many priests smoke and many mullahs smoke too

i saw the film and i liked it

i presume this is ur new guise bahadur

corrected!

veere, anyone who has a religious experience is subjective to their surroundings, they circumstances etc. At the time of the respected Mahapurush, Christian Missionary agenda was at an all time high hence why i feel that his religious experience was subjective to the situation and circumstances at the time. Its like dreams they are subjective to your day to day activities.

Eka Mai jagat viai teen chele parvaan ik sansari ik bhandari ik lae dibaan. There is one primal energy which gave rise to three servents one who creates one who preserves and one who destroyes. Bhrama, Vishnu, Shiva these are metaphysical aspects of God, they are seperate from God but contain the essence of God, hence them being able to carry out such arduous duties. And because they are seperate from God they can take both physical form and the meta physical. The metaphysical form is the highest form, which is the same as God, but because the trehdev can take physical form, this lowers them in the hierachy from Mahakaal. And due to taking the physical form they can be bound by maya and the panch avguns. When in physical form they conform the the laws of nature ie birth and death. eg Vishnus avtaars. Satguru, is something which is the same as these trehdev but its higher because even though its in physical form, the Satguru isnt influenced by maya and the panch avguns. This doesnt however mean that we do not take into account the treh dev because if it wasnt for their contributions we wouldnt be here. As to the Shivaling, the reason it is so important is, because in the beginning the way reproduction occured in accordance to the purans was via the eyes where the male would transfer the tejh into the female, hence why the pachbhramaputras remained balabhramacharis, this process to a long time, and when beseached to bhrama, the sexual intercourse idea was created. The shivalingam represents life, the male and female counterparts of Gods persona, coming together to sajjha shrishti, the milk represents the river of life, there are many references to life as a river/sea eg sansaar samunday taar gobinday etc heres one for you wbol to research, the shivalingam as a jyotrilingam. a totally correct and down to earth statement, couldnt have put it in any other way, kudos to niranjana

i dont understand why you see it as a betrayal. Satguru Nanak gave he Gaddi to Satguru Angad, but we still reffer to Satguru Nanak as Satguru. Satguru Gobind Singh Ji added and modified Adhi Granth which was like the prominent scripture untill the tenth Satguru. Dharam can be shaken and has been shaken, hitler is a prime example of how dharams foundations can shake, hewas an adharmi and went beyong evil hence shaking the very foundations of dharam. btw there is a hindu verse which goes as Yadha yadha hi dharmasya glanirbhavathi bharatha AbhyuthdaanaMadharmasya Thadatmanam Srujamyaham Parithranaya sadhunam vinasayacha dushukrutam dharmasamsthapanardhaya sambhavami yugey yugey whenever the foundations of dharam will rock the lord must take avtar to restore order for the protection of the Good, for the destruction of the Evil, for the establishment of Dhaam, God will manifest in every age

ANOTHER THING I WISH TO STRESS UPON ALL OUR OF MY SIKH AWARENESS BRETHREN IS THAT WE SHOULD ALL ADDRESS OUR GURUS AS SATGURU, THERE IS A HUGE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE PADVI OF GURU AND THAT OF SATGURU, OUR FOUNDING FATHERS ARE OUR SATGURUS, MY SCHOOL TEACHER IS MY GURU, MY MOTHER IS MY GURU, BUT TREH GRANTH IS MY SATGURU. this is my personal view and i hope i havent offended anyone.

deep singh, Treh Granth has the power to absolve sins, but only for those who can be arsed to actively become versed in baani, theres no point in bowing before the shareerik form of Guru Sahib ie the book form unless you know whats inside it ie the essence the actual baani the word the only manifestation that God can take. SatGuru Gobind Singh Ji can return, why can he its his will, who are you to take decisions on our lords behalf. SatGuru Granth sahib cannot activley take up arms and lead an army, well it can but it doesnt have the same effect as that of a human being eg SatGuru Sahib, hence like Satguru Ji said whenever the foundations of dharam will shake i will take form again and again, now Satguru Ji has allready took form of Treh Granth he cant again and again take the same form. because new situations require new thought

where ever you go which ever community you analyse your always going to get that community bigging up their own spiritual leader. The religious experience that veer explained is obviously very subjective and anyone can question whether Jesus Christ really said he wanted his followers to be upon the path of Nanak, and one can even construe that the statement was made as a means of propaganda to stand against the Christian Missionary movements. However what must be taken into consideration is that the three interlinking western faiths are pro missionary, whereas Sikhi and Buddhism and even Hinduism mysticism to an extent, amplifies the importance of living life without a label, because its these labels that rip us apart as a collective human race, and to be in search of God. Whereas the other three give instruction that we are akin to God and that all we have to do is live in accordance to Gods law. Just like Satguru Nanak, Jesus Christ was too a revolutionary in his time, where our Satguru spoke out against the tyranny of Islamic rule and the ever dividing caste system and Jesus spoke out against the hypocrisies of the Jewish leaders. Which ever way you look at it, we all accept that this Earth exists due to the will of God and so do its inhabitants. Anything that God wills is perfect in all ways and that God can NEVER do wrong. Then why the conflicting religious views? Every religion has scripture which has authority, and the originator of those scriptures were principle founders of those religions, and most scriptures were written after the assent of the respective faiths leader. Now is the interpretation of the scripture that has swayed cause rifts between humanity or did every religious leader not share the same universal truth? Even Hinduism which is portrayed as a hardcore polytheistic faith in its core has the universal belief in one all pervading energy. Now if we look at these missionary religions, they all say (due to their modern day interpretation) that if you do not conform to the way of that faith all will go to hell. Now how can the Lord our God creator of all most compassionate and forgiving allow one sect of creation liberation but the others the gates of hell? The way I see it is that religions of the world are like nationality, i may be British you maybe Indian he may be Ugandan she maybe an Eskimo but we all belong on the same Earth we are all human we are all from the same kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, and species we are all Homosapiens, and until we dont see each others as such non of us will see the gates of Sach Khand. With the lastest stir of event the conversion of Bahadur is one incident where i can be accused of being a hypocrite but the reason for hostility was not because of Islam but because of the social time that we live in which influences the way we perceive things. Mahakaal Ji Sahai, Baki sab Mahakaal kshama kare! Jai Jai Shri Mahakaal! Jai Jai Shri Chandika! Akaaal! Sat Sri Akaal!

in my view this tuk has been misinterpreted so many times, i think it suppopsed to be sab te vada satguru, Nanak jin kal rakhi meri the highest of all is satguru (God) Says Nanak who has protected me.

oi pinnacle of all contradiction kayar ali, Bhai Gurdas Jis reference is one of many references of Satguru Nanak. God is seen as the net the water the fish etc in one section of Gurbani, is that demeaning God? NO

erm i dont think so, your just too arrogant to admit that your a totally pathetic contradiction. we dont want you kind of cowards or traitors in sikhi, this is hukam of Akaal to keep shit out like you. btw you have just as clearly proved that your a walking talking living contradiction by not answering my questions as to you Bhai Gurdas Ji comment, Bhai Gurdas Ji also calls him Pira da Pir which is what Ali is also reffered to and even higher than that SATGURU, many times has Bhai Gurdas Ji referred to guru sahib as Sat Guru