OnPathToSikhi Posted December 4, 2014 Author Report Share Posted December 4, 2014 And give up thousands of years of history? For what? We know (in fact the world knows) that you enjoy slavery. Yes, don't give up thousand's of years of "history". Makes sense. As a Hindu, I don't need to learn anything from Sikhism. Its the other way around. So what are you doing on a Sikh forum. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
savinderpalsingh Posted December 4, 2014 Report Share Posted December 4, 2014 Why would I take Amrit? And give up thousands of years of history? For what? Nope, we don't need anything from you. Just STOP using our teachings, modifying them to suit your own agenda. As a Hindu, I don't need to learn anything from Sikhism. Its the other way around. Always has been. From the time Sikhs went undercover to Haridwar to get a morsel of knowledge with new names and disguises. another person , to not listen to . i got 2 in my list here i wish there was a block button i could just block these 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koi Posted December 4, 2014 Report Share Posted December 4, 2014 i would not have objection to taking Amrit if all the Gurus did. what taking amrit has got to do with Sikhi anyway? your narrow-mindedness would not allow any of Gurus into your shiny gurdwaras today. All khalsas are(supposed to be) sikhs but all sikhs are not Khalsas. people like you have made sikhi into an exclusive tat khalsa Why would I take Amrit? And give up thousands of years of history? For what? Nope, we don't need anything from you. Just STOP using our teachings, modifying them to suit your own agenda. As a Hindu, I don't need to learn anything from Sikhism. Its the other way around. Always has been. From the time Sikhs went undercover to Haridwar to get a morsel of knowledge with new names and disguises. Firstly, all the Guru's took amrit, whether Charan Pahul or Khande Pahul. That's how you adopt a Guru. Even hindu philosophy agrees with that. Secondly, from your sentiments, can I assume that you know think of Sikhi as separate from Hinduism? Look, it is possible to discuss this without undermining anyone, but you need to be consistent with your agenda. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaikaara Posted December 4, 2014 Report Share Posted December 4, 2014 You are being bitter for a handful of khalistani dogs using language taught by their najaayaz parents against Sanatan Dharam and Bharat...bro i can understand your sentiments par dont get into this negativity ..there are Puratan Sampradaays within Sikhi who have always acknowledged the source ..dont go astray like those idiots ...stay in the company of the wise ..not those fuddus like the small bunch we have here ...Sikhi is not them. Study the Granths and you will realize what paap these people are accumulating . Why would I take Amrit? And give up thousands of years of history? For what? Nope, we don't need anything from you. Just STOP using our teachings, modifying them to suit your own agenda. As a Hindu, I don't need to learn anything from Sikhism. Its the other way around. Always has been. From the time Sikhs went undercover to Haridwar to get a morsel of knowledge with new names and disguises. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amandeep Hindustani Posted December 4, 2014 Report Share Posted December 4, 2014 We know (in fact the world knows) that you enjoy slavery. Yes, don't give up thousand's of years of "history". Makes sense. So what are you doing on a Sikh forum. More interested in politics and khalistanis. Hence, you will rarely find me commenting on sikh scriptures or quoting verses. However, much of what I see in sikh scripture has already been written about much earlier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amandeep Hindustani Posted December 4, 2014 Report Share Posted December 4, 2014 Which goes back to my original issue of copying or modifying ancient teachings and trying to sell them as new. Can you fully become a vidwan or scholar of Sikhism without reading and understanding the major scriptures of Hinduism? Answer that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koi Posted December 4, 2014 Report Share Posted December 4, 2014 More interested in politics and khalistanis. Hence, you will rarely find me commenting on sikh scriptures or quoting verses. However, much of what I see in sikh scripture has already been written about much earlier. From what we've seen, you've expressed a far greater interest in Khalistan than most. Me thinks you protest too much... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koi Posted December 4, 2014 Report Share Posted December 4, 2014 Which goes back to my original issue of copying or modifying ancient teachings and trying to sell them as new. Can you fully become a vidwan or scholar of Sikhism without reading and understanding the major scriptures of Hinduism? Answer that. Can a person attain Brahm Gian only by reading hindu scriptures? Answer that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnPathToSikhi Posted December 4, 2014 Author Report Share Posted December 4, 2014 More interested in politics and khalistanis. No. You are here because of your own insecurity and inferior complex. Which goes back to my original issue of copying or modifying ancient teachings and trying to sell them as new. What teachings? Have you read them? Do you understand them? Care to elaborate on this?: "There is nothing noble in being superior to some other man or woman. The true nobility is in being superior to your previous self."The Vedas " Neti Neti" - I'm neither this nor that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amandeep Hindustani Posted December 4, 2014 Report Share Posted December 4, 2014 Yes, I have to hand in my report weekly. Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnPathToSikhi Posted December 4, 2014 Author Report Share Posted December 4, 2014 Yes, I have to hand in my report weekly. Lol Correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chatanga1 Posted December 4, 2014 Report Share Posted December 4, 2014 your narrow-mindedness would not allow any of Gurus into your shiny gurdwaras today. our narrow-mindedness allows you on this forum to say what you want. your narrow-minded kept (and still does) millions of hindus from entering mandirs or seeking God, and education. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chatanga1 Posted December 4, 2014 Report Share Posted December 4, 2014 Also, you seem to look at the SGPC for guidance, an institution created by the British. A sign of a slave mentality. You look to the hindutva brigade form guidance. slave mentality and ignorance at its extreme. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chatanga1 Posted December 4, 2014 Report Share Posted December 4, 2014 For the Arabs everybody on this subcontinent was Hindu, therefore, Sikhs are hindus. Dont worry about that. Those that were intelligent enough soon realised that there were different people amongst these "hindus". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chatanga1 Posted December 4, 2014 Report Share Posted December 4, 2014 You are being bitter for a handful of khalistani dogs using language taught by their najaayaz parents against Sanatan Dharam and Bharat...bro i can understand your sentiments par dont get into this negativity ..there are Puratan Sampradaays within Sikhi who have always acknowledged the source ..dont go astray like those idiots ...stay in the company of the wise ..not those fuddus like the small bunch we have here ...Sikhi is not them. Study the Granths and you will realize what paap these people are accumulating . hindustani dogs are taught this bitterness by their najayaz parents jaikara. i hope that these two f***us we have on this forum are the small bunch in their community. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chatanga1 Posted December 4, 2014 Report Share Posted December 4, 2014 More interested in politics and khalistanis. Hence, you will rarely find me commenting on sikh scriptures or quoting verses. rarely? you seem to think that you know what sikhi is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chatanga1 Posted December 4, 2014 Report Share Posted December 4, 2014 Which goes back to my original issue of copying or modifying ancient teachings and trying to sell them as new. Thats what the brahmans were doing wasn't it? exploitation and such, and the khatris had become mercenaries. thats why your house folded flat like a pack of cards against the barbarians from the west. Your people had knowledge and ancient teachings and traded them like whores. Gurmat revived that ancient truth, not copied it, because it couldnt be copied from your lot. because they had lost it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chatanga1 Posted December 4, 2014 Report Share Posted December 4, 2014 From what we've seen, you've expressed a far greater interest in Khalistan than most. Me thinks you protest too much... since when has Khalistan been discussed here over the last few years. To these paranoid hindustani dogs, any time a sikh makes a stand for the panth, its "Khalistan" and "pakistan-inspired terrorists". get over your paranoia and victim mentality. Although thats something you will find hard, given that you have had 1000 years of it running in your genes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amandeep Hindustani Posted December 4, 2014 Report Share Posted December 4, 2014 1000 years eh? Why don't you put up the dates? And we can have a discussion. But I know you won't do that because it will blow your entire theory out of the water. I calculated your rate of slavery a while back and it came out to about 90 percent of your history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amandeep Hindustani Posted December 4, 2014 Report Share Posted December 4, 2014 I'll start you off. The Moghul empire lasted from 1526-1707 a period of 181 years. Now fill in the other 819 years for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnPathToSikhi Posted December 4, 2014 Author Report Share Posted December 4, 2014 1000 years eh? Why don't you put up the dates? And we can have a discussion. But I know you won't do that because it will blow your entire theory out of the water. Yeah we'll put up the dates, it goes more than 1000 years. Yeah, don't crap yet. First, check with your masters what name we should call you with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amandeep Hindustani Posted December 4, 2014 Report Share Posted December 4, 2014 (edited) Sour grapes? Ahhh...that's too bad. nanakpanthis lol I'm going to invite you to Haridwar and this time you don't have to change your appearance and names to get a little bit of gyan to take back. I'm reminded of a story from the jahangirnama it goes something like this " on the banks of the river Ravi lived a Hindu named Arjun" So, I guess our master called us both Hindus. Edited December 4, 2014 by Amandeep Hindustani Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnPathToSikhi Posted December 4, 2014 Author Report Share Posted December 4, 2014 So, I guess our master called us both Hindus. Your mughal master. Who gave you the name "Hindu". Sour grapes? Eat them and enjoy them. Your masters gave your a "fruit" basket probably with a name tag - "Hindu". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amandeep Hindustani Posted December 4, 2014 Report Share Posted December 4, 2014 Your Moghul masters also gave you the same name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnPathToSikhi Posted December 4, 2014 Author Report Share Posted December 4, 2014 (edited) Your Moghul masters also gave you the same name. Caught in a trap! Aren't you. You can't even eat your own grapes now. Check with your masters what you should do. Edited December 4, 2014 by OnPathToSikhi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts