Rocky Posted January 20, 2004 Report Share Posted January 20, 2004 Please Check This Out http://www.singh.co.uk/3453.html 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 20, 2004 Report Share Posted January 20, 2004 Wicked site bro Keep it up... By the way Welcome to the Forum 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest -akalsharan- Posted January 20, 2004 Report Share Posted January 20, 2004 Vaheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru Ji Ki Fateh, A really good site 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shasterkovich Posted January 20, 2004 Report Share Posted January 20, 2004 Wicked site bro Yeah? "The HUT and other Muslim groups have said that they aim to make FRANCE, an ISLAMIC REPUBLIC by the year 2015 and Britain by 2025 through CONVERSIONS, IMMIGRATION and high MUSLIM BIRTH RATES." If you're taking crap like this seriously, then there is something seriously wrong with you. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amrikingh Posted January 21, 2004 Report Share Posted January 21, 2004 Shasterkovich.........u just dont get it do you :roll: 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BabbarSher Posted January 21, 2004 Report Share Posted January 21, 2004 errrr...........ShasterKovich.......can we give u the khitaab of Amir Ul Momeneen. (just kiddin ma....dont take it to ur heart) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shasterkovich Posted January 21, 2004 Report Share Posted January 21, 2004 Shasterkovich.........u just dont get it do you :roll: Would you be kind enough to explain it, whatever it is? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
giani_g Posted January 21, 2004 Report Share Posted January 21, 2004 Here are some facts, France has an approximate poulation of 60 million of which 5 million are Muslim and before it had been 100,000 in 1946. That's a 55 fold increase since now and then due to a lenient immigration and birth control policy. Holland also has a growing problem, of the 20 million inhabitants, 8 million (a conservative estimate) of them are Muslim. It's safe to assume that Holland will be 99% Muslim by 2044 if they are left unchecked. Denmark isn't faring to well either, there are 1 million Muslims and 5 million Danes. Within forty years 1 out of every 3 Danes will be Muslim if things continue as they are. I use to think Britain was crowded with them but surprisingly they only make 2.7% of the population (1,579,229 out of 58,489,975). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shasterkovich Posted January 21, 2004 Report Share Posted January 21, 2004 Here are some facts, France has an approximate poulation of 60 million of which 5 million are Muslim and before it had been 100,000 in 1946. That's a 55 fold increase since now and then due to a lenient immigration and birth control policy. Holland also has a growing problem, of the 20 million inhabitants, 8 million (a conservative estimate) of them are Muslim. It's safe to assume that Holland will be 99% Muslim by 2044 if they are left unchecked. Denmark isn't faring to well either, there are 1 million Muslims and 5 million Danes. Within forty years 1 out of every 3 Danes will be Muslim if things continue as they are. Have you considered that these figures (if accurate) are most likely to reflect cultural norms in immigrant communities rather than religious norms? For instance, a 3rd generation someone I know has a mother with 4 brothers and 1 sister, and a father with 3 brothers and 3 brothers. While he himself has only one sibling. The cultural habit of having many children can be seen not to survive even one or two generations in UK immigrant families. Therefore, the projections and extrapolations you have come up with are based on the false premise that Muslims will continue to multiply at a rate much higher than the indigenous population. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
giani_g Posted January 21, 2004 Report Share Posted January 21, 2004 These statistics are based on: World Almanac and Book of Facts - 1935 Readers Digest Almanac and Yearbook - 1983 The CIA World's Fact's Book - 2001 I don't think you can get any more accurate than that. :roll: "The cultural habit of having many children can be seen not to survive even one or two generations in UK immigrant families." - Shasterkovich But they STILL ARE on the increase and organisatons like HUT are running a muck. If second or third generation Muslims are still speaking with the freshi accent and going missionary on our girls then what's stopping them from not having many children. By the way what sources have you read to confirm this. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
giani_g Posted January 21, 2004 Report Share Posted January 21, 2004 crap typo! i ment to say: what's stopping them from having many children instead of what's stopping them from not having many children 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shasterkovich Posted January 21, 2004 Report Share Posted January 21, 2004 These statistics are based on: World Almanac and Book of Facts - 1935 Readers Digest Almanac and Yearbook - 1983 The CIA World's Fact's Book - 2001 :roll: But they STILL ARE on the increase and organisatons like HUT are running a muck. If second or third generation Muslims are still speaking with the freshi accent and going missionary on our girls then what's stopping them from not having many children. By the way what sources have you read to confirm this. To confirm what? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
giani_g Posted January 21, 2004 Report Share Posted January 21, 2004 "Have you considered that these figures (if accurate)..."- Shasterkovich You questioned my statistics and I have shown the sources. Don't question if you don't expect a reply. "To confirm what?" - Shasterkovich I'd assume that you'd use your initiative and know that I was talking about your quote: "The cultural habit of having many children can be seen not to survive even one or two generations in UK immigrant families." - Shasterkovich I don't believe that this is entirely true, it is still quite prevalent in the slums and council estates where the majority of them still live. I just want you to back up your statement. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beast Posted January 22, 2004 Report Share Posted January 22, 2004 i try not to read too much into these sort of figures. Just remember that saying, it has been statistically proven that statistics don't prove anything. : ) Hypothetical Situation: Is there any fact's book that tells the number of Sikhs in the UK in the 1950s and in the 1970s? The number of Sikhs in the UK would have increased by many fold during this period. And, for example, if we were the BNP (right wing group) studying these figures we could hypothesise that the predicted number of Sikhs in the UK in the year (eg) 2015 would be 70% of the total population. Wishful thinking, but how likely is it to happen? Holland also has a growing problem, of the 20 million inhabitants, 8 million (a conservative estimate) of them are Muslim. It's safe to assume that Holland will be 99% Muslim by 2044 if they are left unchecked. Denmark isn't faring to well either, there are 1 million Muslims and 5 million Danes. Within forty years 1 out of every 3 Danes will be Muslim if things continue as they are. Basically, anyone whose done statistics at college/university level will be able to explain why this assumption is wrong. (I'm no good coz I did mechanics! ). Also on a political note, Denmark (or Sweden if I'm wrong) has tightened up its immigration policy immensely. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
giani_g Posted January 22, 2004 Report Share Posted January 22, 2004 Yeh I guess Beast is correct (though statistics do prove things depending on the context in which they are used). I don't think Denmark tightened up its policy or Sweden (Sweden's known for having a strict drug policy). I know Holland has because the Christian Democratic Party has taken over there. I don't see why don't have an immigration policy like Australia. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amrikingh Posted January 23, 2004 Report Share Posted January 23, 2004 Would you be kind enough to explain it, whatever it is? Even if i did.......you still wouldn't be able to understand :roll: 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shasterkovich Posted January 23, 2004 Report Share Posted January 23, 2004 Even if i did.......you still wouldn't be able to understand :roll: I'm older than you are and I have more education as well as experience in life than you. I can appreciate that you may have certain limitations in your capacity to express yourself using the written medium, but I would urge you to try anyway. Treat this as a form of exercise, to help you move along on your road to coherence. I would'nt rely on emoticons too much if I were you. Not everyone would agree that your emotional responses are typical of a rational, well-adjusted and balanced human being. But don't let that bother you - you're in good company here. I know your game, sonny. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
giani_g Posted January 23, 2004 Report Share Posted January 23, 2004 Hey stop arguing. Amrik$ingh, you shouldn't insult someone if they don't say something you like, instead justify why you think he is wrong/incorrect. We are here to discuss like friends not debate like enemies. Which brings me to my next point: "I'm older than you are and I have more education as well as experience in life than you...Looking forward to the next time you stop by (on your daddy's computer)." - Shasterkovich Everyone's point is relevant regardless of education or material possesions. Also age doesn't make one superior, its what one has done in their time that matters so don't assume that just because someone is younger than you that doesn't mean that they have an inferior intellect to you. Sri Guru Har Krishan Ji is a good example of this. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amrikingh Posted January 26, 2004 Report Share Posted January 26, 2004 I'm older than you are and I have more education as well as experience in life than you. I can appreciate that you may have certain limitations in your capacity to express yourself using the written medium, but I would urge you to try anyway. Treat this as a form of exercise, to help you move along on your road to coherence. I would'nt rely on emoticons too much if I were you. Not everyone would agree that your emotional responses are typical of a rational, well-adjusted and balanced human being. But don't let that bother you - you're in good company here. I know your game, sonny. you might be older and more educated but your still dumb enough to think drugs is the only solution in life kera game, mai tha game's kail vinni sakda (joke) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amrikingh Posted January 26, 2004 Report Share Posted January 26, 2004 Hey stop arguing. Amrik$ingh, you shouldn't insult someone if they don't say something you like, instead justify why you think he is wrong/incorrect. mr giani.......me only messingh 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shasterkovich Posted January 26, 2004 Report Share Posted January 26, 2004 you might be older and more educated but your still dumb enough to think drugs is the only solution in life An act in liberated consciousness: to take a substance voluntarily, to change your mind to achieve a dharmik object. An act in enslaved oblivion: to be directed by one's mind to take a substance, because of dislike of a present mental state. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shasterkovich Posted January 26, 2004 Report Share Posted January 26, 2004 An act in liberated consciousness: to take a substance voluntarily, to change your mind to achieve a dharmik object. An act in enslaved oblivion: to be directed by one's mind to take a substance, because of dislike of a present mental state. Example: Vietnam war. US soldiers (mostly conscripted youths), not properly conditioned for the realities of this type of war, took to using diamorphine (heroin) regularly in Vietnam. This stuff papered over the cracks so that they could continue to function as soldiers and fight in the field as directed. When they returned to the States, they simply stopped using heroin (which is normally an addictive substance), without experiencing any particular difficulty giving up. This was possible because it was according to dharam for them simply to fight as ordinary soldiers in Vietnam, and anything they took to help them to do that would have had an almost negligible harmful effect. Hence it's OK to do drugs if thereby a greater good is served. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Javanmard Posted January 26, 2004 Report Share Posted January 26, 2004 very wise words shasterkovitch! :wink: 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amrikingh Posted January 27, 2004 Report Share Posted January 27, 2004 An act in liberated consciousness: to take a substance voluntarily, to change your mind to achieve a dharmik object. An act in enslaved oblivion: to be directed by one's mind to take a substance, because of dislike of a present mental state. mental state? eh you can't control yourself? da pain....too much for you? are you that much of a man ? :wink: 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amrikingh Posted January 27, 2004 Report Share Posted January 27, 2004 very wise words shasterkovitch! :wink: lalleshvari.....you were born confused....... (joke) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.