GurjantGnostic

Could have some benefit. Depending on type and extent of damage. If the little hairs are all blown down that going to take a miracle of healing through Naam, but even then the rest can't hurt and would help a lot of intermediary forms of hearing damage. But if you longterm, loud whitenoise, your way into tinutus and deafness that's medically considered permanent. Only God healing that. Ultimately good advice for hearing health, or overall health.

It's called Vaaran Bhai Gurdas Ji and is also Gurbani ultimately. In that it was both inspired and approved.

There is a slippery slope to "Guru ji was beung poetic"... You can poetry the whole Dharam away. Gurbani is predominantly super literal, prescriptions and practices, with clear implications.

Fascinating but Sachakand is a literal place. Astral and causal places minus a corpse are just as real and illusory as this world. And the truth being that which never changes and that being the literal place of it, you're approaching Akal. Gurbani is not figurative really much if ever.

We are being killed and otherwise abused and our phones provide 98 percent the access and targetting.

Unfortunately @Premi .... dude is correct about phones and computers. and I've experienced a lot of what's he's saying. If I were to go into detail it would even sound a little nuts, but my phone is verifiably used against me, something I track using paid security apps and my own vpn server that I have all the traffic logs for not just a vpn service. Snowden agrees and wasn't stupid or crazy but aware.

Reread that and think about the entailments.

Remember who told y'all sihknet and many other sites are Sikhnet and Nesbits cults respectively? Remember the all white woman panj pyare doing amrit in London you all flat out went blind to? All Sikh imagery, not Gurmat, wayyy worse than Gurmat use of Mary.

Agree about 3h0. Our faith validates aspects of other faiths. Their prophets, devi devte, texts etc to varying degrees. Guru Saibhan approved the Bible and didn't critique Christ or the Bible. At all, unlike say the vedas and devi devte. So Biblical imagery is Sikh imagery when presented from a Gurmat POV. The inclusion of Mary isn't non Gurmat at all. See miracle at zeitoon for cross reference. Now what 3ho says about that mural? Total non gurmat bs I'm sure, but that's true of all murals they make. They tell an ungurmat story. But to ask if images are okay and which ones is technically a seperate topic. How they parchar? Agree 3h0 totally wrong. They also still receive most daswandh, daan if that, from the ignorant masses of the Paanth. And the inclusion of Guru approved imagery isn't the problem.

Welcome back Veer Ji.

Moral of the story. Walk for so long it's not worth sifting the cctv. I mean don't steal it's stupid and evil.

Think about the implications of these Ang. ਤੁਧੁਧਿਆਇਨਿ੍ਹਬੇਦਕਤੇਬਾਸਣੁਖੜੇ॥ tudh dhiaaini(h) bedh katebaa san khaRe || The followers of the Vedas, and the Bible, standing at Your Door, meditate on You. Guru Arjan Dev Ji in Raag Gujri - 518 ਬੇਦਕਤੇਬਕਹਹੁਮਤਝੂਠੇਝੂਠਾਜੋਨਬਿਚਾਰੈ॥ bedh kateb kahahu mat jhootte jhoottaa jo na bichaarai || Do not say that the Vedas, and the Bible are false. Those who do not contemplate them are false. Bhagat Kabeer Ji in Raag Prabhaatee - 1350 What's the Bible's message? We confirm it.

Now if you ask them about the mural and their explanation isn't Gurmat? Rejected. If they're targetting hispanics, Mary being center makes sense.

Some people probably argue if any images at all are allowed. But if these images are presented according to Gurmat I can't see how they're offensive. Sikhi itself says that God has been part of this Dharam vs aDharm the whole time. Those are Dharmi images. We affirm things about everyone in that mural.

Double posted

Love it. Couple small comment. Keeping kesh is opposite of egotism. It's embracing your God given form in a way the world does not find fashionable. The problem with roop is people putting it on early or when dishonest. And I do think Vaheguru is technically correct.

The Bible is as confirmed as the Vedas in Gurbani.

Yes and yet men and women, provided both are sincere and mentally well, are very compatible. Problem these days is each person has at least a 1 in 3 chance of being a turd.

I feel for them but I could pass that test still. I think he's hamming it up.

What a loser. Dude has that mutant look.

Should read sufi fudhu.

For being our academics they sure do come to weird conclusions. You're aware of where those sants...are contradicting Guru Saibhan? Just ignore the Sant title at this point.

Meat is acceptable in Kalyugh. Vegetarianism and Veganism are seen practiced by the compassionate.

I'm not sure all those are used as Naam but almost.

It's Vishnu Har Gobind Ram I believe. The Mantar not the Devi Devte. The point is 1 Naam, the one given by Guru Nanak Dev Ji, wasn't made up by anybody. Nor did your ancestors make up the vedas. ਨਾਭਿਕਮਲਤੇਬ੍ਰਹਮਾਉਪਜੇਬੇਦਪੜਹਿਮੁਖਿਕੰਠਿਸਵਾਰਿ॥ naabh kamal te brahamaa aupaje bedh paReh mukh ka(n)tt savaar || From the lotus of Vishnu's navel, Brahma was born; He chanted the Vedas with a melodious voice. Guru Nanak Dev Ji in Raag Gujri - 489 Guru Granth Sahib Ji is written to all people. 1 Naam is given to Sikhs.