Jump to content

osingh1

Members
  • Posts

    68
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    osingh1 got a reaction from Arsh1469 in Akal Takht Request To Give Saza To Niddar Singh - Letter   
    Jathedars of Nihang Dals and Damdami Taksal Mukhi letter regarding Niddar Singh and koor parchaar:

    http://www.shastervi...ingh-exclusive/


    Here is a let­ter from the main Nihang Organ­isa­tions in India presen­ted to Jathedar of the Akal Takht Sahib Jathedar Gurbachan Singh.

    The fol­low­ing is a trans­la­tion of the letter



    To the Esteemed Jathedar of the Akaal Takht,

    We feel com­pelled to bring to your atten­tion that Nid­dar Singh aka Surjit Singh bains of Wol­ver­hamp­ton UK is involved in anti Sikh con­sipir­acies by doing anti-Sikh parchaar on his web­sites and dilut­ing the sikh philo­sophy by teach­ing that Sikhs are a part of Hinduism. With his hein­ous teachings(koorr parchar) he is mis­lead­ing the Sikh sangat.

    He keeps chan­ging the name of his akhara on his web­site to include names such as “Hindu Santan Shiv Akhara” and is falsely using the name of Jathedar Akali Baba Dar­bara Singh to legit­im­ise himself.

    Nid­dar Singh is stat­ing that the Khalsa was born from Shiv Ji and not guru Gobind Singh ji. He also pro­claims falsely that the “Farla” of Nihang Singhs is sprouted from the ganges river and that blue bana is from the col­our of Shiva. He is also say­ing that the chakar that Nihang Singhs wear on their dumalla is a sign of Shivji.

    He is say­ing that the Sikh dharam emerged from hinduism and that Sikhi is just another sam­parda of the Hindu dharam and is also teach­ing that Sikh Shastar Vidiya and Gatka is a branch of the Hindu Dharam.

    Nid­dar Singhs activ­it­ies in the uk are upset­ting and divid­ing Sikhs there. Guru Gobind Singh ji made the Khalsa unique. This fake Nihang is spread­ing doubts, con­fu­sion and slander within the sikh sangat.

    On the 300th cel­eb­ra­tion of Guru Granth Ji’s Gur­gaddi the sangat of Hazur Sahib kicked him out due to his nefar­i­ous activ­it­ies and anti Sikh parchaar.

    By put­ting the con­cerns of the panth first we recomend that this indi­vidual is brought before the Akal Takht to answer for his crimes and receive pun­ish­ment accord­ingly and the sikh sangat be freed of this confusion.

    signed by

    Baba Joginder Singh — Jathedar of Budha Dal
    Baba Avatar Singh — Jathedar of Bidhi Chand Dal
    Baba Nihal Singh — Jathedar of Haria Vela Dal
    Baba Gaj­jan Singh — Jathedar Tarana Dal (Baba Bakala)
    Baba Harnam Singh Khalsa — Jathedar Dam­d­ami Taksal




  2. Like
    osingh1 got a reaction from Arsh1469 in Puratan Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji   
    Chatanga ji,

    Just sign up to http://www.panjabdigilib.org and you can view numerous saroops. You will notice that 95% of these saroops contain these additional banis. In the saroop on gurmatveecahar, slok Mahalla nauva is on page 833.

    The reason I replied was that bhai Kam Singh ji seems to suggest that these additional banis are part of sri Guru Granth Sahib ji.

    I am definitely not a top level scholar.
  3. Like
    osingh1 got a reaction from Arsh1469 in Puratan Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji   
    In the kartarpuri bir these additional bani's appear after sri Mundavani.In my opinion these bani's are not part of sri Guru Granth Sahib ji. Guru Tegh Bahadur ji's bani was added before sri Mundavani. If these bani's were authentic surely they would have been added before sri Mundavani.

    In any case more research is required in this field. Another problem is that many puratan saroops were stolen or shaheed during operation bluestar. So it is more difficult to do the required research.

    There was a gathering of the panth before saroops of Guru Granth Sahib ji were published and it was decided that these banis were not authentic and they were omitted.

    One thing that stands out is that these banis are in the majority of cases after sri Mundavani you can check this by looking at saroops on Panjab Digital Library website.

    Gursikhs that believe that sri Guru Granth Sahib ji ends at Mundavani will not accept banis afer this. However Gursikhs that believe Ragmala is the bhog of sri Guru Granth Sahib ji will be more more open minded on this issue. I do not know the stance of Samprada's or Taksal on this issue.

    I think these issues should be discussed at panthic level by top scholars of the panth, I feel that discussing such issues on forum will only lead to confusion and useless arguments.

    Rabb Rakhe
  4. Like
    osingh1 got a reaction from Arsh1469 in Videos - Sant Giani Mohan Singh   
    Vah! Vah! I didn't realise Giani ji had stoppped recordings of their katha. This is the nirmata of Giani Mohan Singh ji. They truly want to remain as gupt (hidden) as possible. I have read they also have a sign outside their room which advises sangat against seeking darshan of themselves but instead have darshan of sri Guru Granth Sahib ji. The only downside to remaining so gupt is that many Gursikhs today have never heard of Giani Mohan Singh ji. I only wished that Giani ji had written some books so that future generations could learn from them. However, at least we have the katha to listen to.

    So are these recent recordings you have been made secretly? What year were they recorded? I look forward to hearing the recent recordings you have.

    Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh
  5. Like
    osingh1 got a reaction from SAadmin in Videos - Sant Giani Mohan Singh   
    Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh

    Thanks for the videos bhai Kam Singh ji. Giani Mohan Singh ji's face says it all. Many talk about so and so avastha but listening to Giani ji's voice one gets the impression that Giani ji has reached a level that paapi jeevs like me can only contemplate.

    Do you have any update on Giani Mohan Singh ji's health? I wonder if cassettes/audio of their Katha are available at Gurdwara Akhand Parkash in Bhinder Kalan?
×
×
  • Create New...