Army Warning To Pm: China Can Deploy Half-A-Million Troops On Lac For A Month

[kdsingh80]

New Delhi China now has the capability to deploy and sustain more than half-a-million troops for over a month on the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in case of a high threat scenario with India.

Combining deft defence diplomacy with India’s neighbours and major infrastructure upgradation in restive Xinjiang and Tibet, Beijing is expected to be increasingly assertive towards New Delhi and may put pressure on Arunachal Pradesh in near future.

This threat perception and assessment in the form of a presentation in South Block was given to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, Defence Minister A K Antony, National Security Adviser S S Menon, Principal Secretary T K Nair and Defence Secretary Pradeep Kumar by the Indian military brass last month.

While the government is tight-lipped about the presentation, the military brass told the PM that Chinese PLA has acquired the capability to deploy 34 troop divisions (one division has 23,000 troops) along the LAC in case of a high threat scenario by pulling out troops from Chengdu and Lanzhou military regions. When compared to the Indian strength of nine holding divisions along the northern borders, the PLA with a defence budget estimated at $150 billion holds overwhelming advantage.

As part of major infrastructure upgradation in Tibet and Xinjiang, China is doing the following:

Connection with all counties in Tibet with border roads completed. Road network increased from 51,000 km in 2008 to 58,000 km in 2010. Plans to increase black topped roads by another 70,000 km on the anvil.

Extension of Qinghai-Tibet Railway from Golmund to Lhasa and thereon to Shigatse (close to Sikkim). Rail connectivity is planned to link Kathmandu, Myanmar, Bhutan, Pakistan and Central Asian republics. Eleven new rail lines on the anvil in Tibet and Xinjiang for rapid deployment of PLA.

There are eight airfields in Tibet, including five operational ones; 18 air bases in Tibet and Xinjiang have the capability to put India under range of Sukhoi 27 aircraft.

The Indian security concerns get multiplied when this Chinese advantage is backed with an all-weather friend like Pakistan. Beijing is in the process of supplying four F-22 frigates along with JF-17 aircraft to Islamabad. PLA has pushed some 1,000 troops in PoK for upgradation of Karakoram Highway and to link it with sea ports of Karachi, Gwadar and Bin Qassim. This will not only give strategic depth to Pakistan but also allow PLA to control the Persian Gulf.

China’s Dong Fang Electric Supply Corporation and Pakistan Railways have also signed a feasibility study contract on a Havelian-Khunjerab Pass rail link. The military brass also gave information on Chinese inroads into Nepal, Myanmar, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka.

http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/ArmywarningtoPMChinacandeployhalfamilliontroopsonLACforamonth/788722/

[Mr Sardar]

Guess pakistan and china tightness is going to have the indians killed. Don't the chinese see they are being used for pakistans agenda of spreading islam all over the world. The pakistanis have some mongolians chinese blood in them that genghas khan evilness. Well after china is done with India the pakistanis are going to turn onto china to convert them to Islam. All islamist plots to think we thought the chinese were clever. China and India has more in common via buddhism and because of that there is not much issue of the indians and chinese intermarrying especially in nepal.

Edited May 12, 2011 by sarbatdapala

[dalsingh101]

The people who would probably most love a war between China and India (and would economically benefit the most from such a scenario) would be the west, you would make an even bigger packet than they are now, selling weapons to India (the Yids would also profit). On top of that, the reduced output of Chinese manufacturing (we could expect in such a scenario) would also help currently struggling to compete western economies.

I don't know why India and China are locked in such a negative dynamic. It needs to get sorted. Actually, China probably sees India as the west's beeatch. So that will be difficult.

Edited May 12, 2011 by dalsingh101

[kdsingh80]

I don't know why India and China are locked in such a negative dynamic. It needs to get sorted. Actually, China probably sees India as the west's admin cut. So that will be difficult.

China has as much imperialistic ambitions as west has may be more.Indian leaders had same type of thinking as you have that's why they went to China and India get its ass kicked in 1962.Both India and China are competetors and they can never be friends.Yesterday I was watching discussions and some channlel was saying That Indian parts,Nepal,South Korea and Japan are all on the list of China to invade

USA want India to become its pet dog while China want India to be kicked street dog.Now India has to decide what to become,no other choice

[Mithar]

China has as much imperialistic ambitions as west has may be more.Indian leaders had same type of thinking as you have that's why they went to China and India get its ass kicked in 1962.Both India and China are competetors and they can never be friends.Yesterday I was watching discussions and some channlel was saying That Indian parts,Nepal,South Korea and Japan are all on the list of China to invade

USA want India to become its pet dog while China want India to be kicked street dog.Now India has to decide what to become,no other choice

Well, as far as Communist China is concerned it is a threat to India. But from China's perspective, India is no angel. India's open support for the Dalai Lama and the Tibetan freedom movement is a direct challenge to Chinese territorial integrity. The reason why India got it's ass kicked in the 62 war is all because of Nehru. He was the worst thing to have happened to India.

As far as Sikhs are concearned I think Sikh leaders should develop good relations with China. China is a future world leader which will even surpass the US-Euro world domination. In fact, India should also realize this and develop friendly relations with China instead of trying to complete with it. The US does not want China and India to have good relations. These Anglo Saxons are smart and still playing their divide and rule game. They are trying to use India as a counter balance to a rising China.

Russia knows what the west is doing, that is why Russia is trying to promote India Chinese friendship by creating and promoting BRIC in opposition to US-Euro economic bloc. Russia on their part is even trying to counter NATO by creating and promoting the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO). Russia is trying it's best to bring India into the SCO but India trying not to make the US feel threatened is not joining, while Pakistan knowing the benefits of the SCO is trying it's best to join but the SCO does not want Pakistan that much since they know Pakistan is going to be more of a liability than an asset.

Edited May 12, 2011 by Mithar

[dalsingh101]

Check out the confidence of the Paks, who blatantly take the pi55 out of the west/America and then India, with its stereotypical 'pussy' sycophant image. Indians are a weak people generally. That's why they have been invaded/dominated for so long, by so many people.

I don't know why India wants to flex it against China because they will only get their arse kicked in and end up demoralising everyone, like Nehru did.

If India had brains it would try not to be dependent on the west, but it looks like they are going the 'pet' route.

Edited May 12, 2011 by dalsingh101

[kdsingh80]

Well, as far as Communist China is concerned it is a threat to India. But from China's perspective, India is no angel. India's open support for the Dalai Lama and the Tibetan freedom movement is a direct challenge to Chinese territorial integrity. The reason why India got it's ass kicked in the 62 war is all because of Nehru. He was the worst thing to have happened to India.

India hardly supported Tibetans .If India really wanted to counter China then it should had deployed Army in Tibet in 1952 as Indian army was quite strong at that time and could had countered Chinese army well but India failed to did that and also Nehru in United nations accepted that Tibet was part of China .What you people are saying was the Nehru fantasy that China and India will become great friends.

As far as Sikhs are concearned I think Sikh leaders should develop good relations with China. China is a future world leader which will even surpass the US-Euro world domination

Sikhs should stay away from this conflict.China will use us and may throw us and again we will be branded as chinese agents.Also I don't think at present China will much give weightage to Sikhs as there are many other separatists movements in which would have been really interested .

In fact, India should also realize this and develop friendly relations with China instead of trying to complete with it.

India and China can never have friendly relations China call Arunachal South Tibet and its part.Friendly relation means India should give up its claim on Aksai chin and give arunachal to China which India can never afford.

The US does not want China and India to have good relations. These Anglo Saxons are smart and still playing their divide and rule game. They are trying to use India as a counter balance to a rising China.

If USA will start favouring India then this will be the best thing for India.What China can offer to India? Last time they were also trying to steal software industry from India on the other hand it is the software industry of west that has changed the destiny of millions of Indians.US west- china conflict is much more favourable for india than India china- russia relation.China became rich because it offered its low cost wage workers to MNC companies of west.If US china tension will increase then more companies will pull out from China and will search their bases in India,Bangladesh,Vietnam etc

[Mithar]

India hardly supported Tibetans .If India really wanted to counter China then it should had deployed Army in Tibet in 1952 as Indian army was quite strong at that time and could had countered Chinese army well but India failed to did that and also Nehru in United nations accepted that Tibet was part of China .What you people are saying was the Nehru fantasy that China and India will become great friends.

Which is why people say Nehru is the reason why India got beat in 1962. When the British left India in 1947, they left India with a modern army which was amongst the best trained armies in the world. But Nehru had an anti army stance. He made cuts after cuts to the army which made the army only more inefficient. China on the other hand was spending more and more money on their army. So in 1962 when a strong large and efficient Chinese army faced a under equipped, under funded Indian army the result was not surprising. Only after 1962 did India realized it's mistake and began investing in the army and the results show how well India performed in the 1965 war against Pakistan. If Nehru was not PM of India, it is very likely that today India would have been a first world nation.

Sikhs should stay away from this conflict.China will use us and may throw us and again we will be branded as chinese agents.Also I don't think at present China will much give weightage to Sikhs as there are many other separatists movements in which would have been really interested .

Taking advantage of an opportunity when it presents itself is a quality Sikh leaders need to realize. Much of the world including the Muslim world is now looking towards China. They realize China will be unstoppable and Sikhs leaders need to take advantage of this. SGPC should send religious delegations to China to build a solid relationship since SGPC is considered a representative of the Panth.

India and China can never have friendly relations China call Arunachal South Tibet and its part.Friendly relation means India should give up its claim on Aksai chin and give arunachal to China which India can never afford.

Not really, if China wanted to take over Arunanchal and other parts of India they would very well have done so in 1962 when they had India at their mercy. They use Arunanchal (and other parts of India) more of a scare tactic to keep India on her toes so India would be on the defensive instead of the offensive and claim territory lost to China in the 1962 war. It is a tactical move on China's part. Plus they do this because of India's open support of the Dalai Lama and the Tibetan independence movement. From China's perspective it is a counter measure to India's moves that they see as threatening to Chinese territory.

If USA will start favouring India then this will be the best thing for India.What China can offer to India? Last time they were also trying to steal software industry from India on the other hand it is the software industry of west that has changed the destiny of millions of Indians.US west- china conflict is much more favourable for india than India china- russia relation.China became rich because it offered its low cost wage workers to MNC companies of west.If US china tension will increase then more companies will pull out from China and will search their bases in India,Bangladesh,Vietnam etc

No my friend, trusting USA would be the worst move India can make. Friendship with USA is often as deadly as hostility from the USA. You can never trust the US. The US is like the former British empire. Just as the Sikhs trusted the British by signing treaties of friendship with the British but ended up being taken over by their former "friend", same way friendship with the US will result in India being controlled by the US. If India is smart they will rather choose Russia and China over the US.

[kdsingh80]

Taking advantage of an opportunity when it presents itself is a quality Sikh leaders need to realize. Much of the world including the Muslim world is now looking towards China. They realize China will be unstoppable and Sikhs leaders need to take advantage of this. SGPC should send religious delegations to China to build a solid relationship since SGPC is considered a representative of the Panth.

Is there any such thing sikh leader?The only mass support in Punjab have is to Akali dal badal Who is almost the most hated politician by Other Sikhs.Also Akali dal Badal is very much pro India so there is hardly any chance that they will go to China.

Not really, if China wanted to take over Arunanchal and other parts of India they would very well have done so in 1962 when they had India at their mercy. They use Arunanchal (and other parts of India) more of a scare tactic to keep India on her toes so India would be on the defensive instead of the offensive and claim territory lost to China in the 1962 war. It is a tactical move on China's part. Plus they do this because of India's open support of the Dalai Lama and the Tibetan independence movement. From China's perspective it is a counter measure to India's moves that they see as threatening to Chinese territory.

1962 was a difficult year for China too they were isolated internationally and were also of enemies of Soviet and USA .advances in Arunachal could have mean full scale war and much more international support to India including supplies

so they made wise decision by withdrawing from Arunachal but that does not mean they don't have ambitions in Arunachal.in 1975 even the sikkim accpeted itslef part of India because of fear of Chinese invasion .Though mongloid people in India are regularly mocked and laughed but they still prefer to be part of India rather than China.

No my friend, trusting USA would be the worst move India can make. Friendship with USA is often as deadly as hostility from the USA. You can never trust the US. The US is like the former British empire. Just as the Sikhs trusted the British by signing treaties of friendship with the British but ended up being taken over by their former "friend", same way friendship with the US will result in India being controlled by the US. If India is smart they will rather choose Russia and China over the US

Tell me what happened to countries who supported Soviet in cold war.All of them including India ended up as bankrupt While allies of west Like South korea Japan etc emerged as industrial nations.

How China become so rich? By allowing their labour to be fully exploited by west and USA MNC companies so even China is dependent on west .If USA and West ban imports from China they will loose cheap consumer goods but Chinese will loose millions of jobs

Outsourcing in the 21st century is bitter reality for west and both India and China are competing for it.even some economists says that if china revalue its currency then India and few other countries will be the biggest beneficiories rather trhan USA or West

[Mithar]

Is there any such thing sikh leader?The only mass support in Punjab have is to Akali dal badal Who is almost the most hated politician by Other Sikhs.Also Akali dal Badal is very much pro India so there is hardly any chance that they will go to China.

Badal is a stooge of the BJP. He only cares for himself and his family. If and whenever Sikhs have a leader who will selflessly care for the Panth, then he should develope relations with China independently of India. The SGPC has a lot of potential if only used by the right leader.

1962 was a difficult year for China too they were isolated internationally and were also of enemies of Soviet and USA .advances in Arunachal could have mean full scale war and much more international support to India including supplies

so they made wise decision by withdrawing from Arunachal but that does not mean they don't have ambitions in Arunachal.in 1975 even the sikkim accpeted itslef part of India because of fear of Chinese invasion .Though mongloid people in India are regularly mocked and laughed but they still prefer to be part of India rather than China.

In 1962 war while India was getting beaten, Nehru asked US for military help which the US refused. Regardless of military aid, India was at the mercy of China since it had advantages over India militarily. China could have done all it wanted and more. At the time, China was not a nation that cared about world opinion which is what Nehru failed to realize. Arunanchal was for China's taking as she pleased and India could have done nothing. But China didn't take it simply because she knew that India had been badly defeated and the Chinese objective of the invasion had been fulfilled. Arunanchal and other parts of India are only being claimed by China only as a counter measure to keep India at check. It is more of a diplomatic issue now than a real military threat. Indian media tends to over exaggerate the Chinese threat to keep viewers more eager to listen to the news since Pakistan is such a boring new now to Indian viewers. Media tends to create new threats which are only as true as the boogyman.

Tell me what happened to countries who supported Soviet in cold war.All of them including India ended up as bankrupt While allies of west Like South korea Japan etc emerged as industrial nations.

How China become so rich? By allowing their labour to be fully exploited by west and USA MNC companies so even China is dependent on west .If USA and West ban imports from China they will loose cheap consumer goods but Chinese will loose millions of jobs

As I said previously, the biggest tragedy for India was Nehru himself. That pathetic man chose all the wrong economic policies for India because of which India could not progress until Manmohan Singh became finance minister in the 90s and opened up India. India's economic backwarness has nothing to do with it's dealings with the Soviet Union. India's failure was because of it's socialist economic structure that Nehru decided to adopt.

Outsourcing in the 21st century is bitter reality for west and both India and China are competing for it.even some economists says that if china revalue its currency then India and few other countries will be the biggest beneficiories rather trhan USA or West

As far as the economy is concearned then India's greatest leader is undoubtedly Manmohan Singh. If only a man like him had been India's leader in 1947 India would now have been a first world nation. Indian leaders have shown over and over that they are not smart enough to deal with other world leaders. The US will only use India as a counter balance against China for it's own selfish interests. The US is the most imperialistic nation since the fall of the British empire. Russia and China alliance are the rising sun, they are nations which will be advanced economically and military in the near future. India would be smart to join them.

[kdsingh80]

Badal is a stooge of the BJP. He only cares for himself and his family. If and whenever Sikhs have a leader who will selflessly care for the Panth, then he should develope relations with China independently of India. The SGPC has a lot of potential if only used by the right leader.

Whether Badal is stooge or not reality is his party get maximum number of sikh votes.Also please tell why will sikh youth will support China when they themselves have Dreams of USA,Canada UK .If China West conflict will grow then chances of Sikhs immigrating to these countries will get less as they will also be seen as ally of China.

In 1962 war while India was getting beaten, Nehru asked US for military help which the US refused. Regardless of military aid, India was at the mercy of China since it had advantages over India militarily. China could have done all it wanted and more. At the time, China was not a nation that cared about world opinion which is what Nehru failed to realize. Arunanchal was for China's taking as she pleased and India could have done nothing. But China didn't take it simply because she knew that India had been badly defeated and the Chinese objective of the invasion had been fulfilled. Arunanchal and other parts of India are only being claimed by China only as a counter measure to keep India at check. It is more of a diplomatic issue now than a real military threat. Indian media tends to over exaggerate the Chinese threat to keep viewers more eager to listen to the news since Pakistan is such a boring new now to Indian viewers. Media tends to create new threats which are only as true as the boogyman.

In 1962 China was in near conflict with soviet over border .Soviet was much superior at that time.Also I heard that USA supplied lot of material to India in 1962.As far media is concerned there are many leftists journalists Which tried their level best that India and China can become friend but it is always the China that give an edge to Anti chinese media.China said that arunachal people will not need any visa for China as they are part of China ,I don't think India ever said that about separate visas for Tibetans also please remember China's demand for Arunachal got much more vocal in last 15 years while India has not increased its Tibetan support

As I said previously, the biggest tragedy for India was Nehru himself. That pathetic man chose all the wrong economic policies for India because of which India could not progress until Manmohan Singh became finance minister in the 90s and opened up India. India's economic backwarness has nothing to do with it's dealings with the Soviet Union. India's failure was because of it's socialist economic structure that Nehru decided to adopt.

And who was the ideal of nehru? It was soviet and anti west feeling

As far as the economy is concearned then India's greatest leader is undoubtedly Manmohan Singh. If only a man like him had been India's leader in 1947 India would now have been a first world nation. Indian leaders have shown over and over that they are not smart enough to deal with other world leaders. The US will only use India as a counter balance against China for it's own selfish interests. The US is the most imperialistic nation since the fall of the British empire. Russia and China alliance are the rising sun, they are nations which will be advanced economically and military in the near future. India would be smart to join them.

As said above China and India are competetors as both the countries are over populated on the other hand West including Russia has very poor birth rate Which means massive shortage of manpower and huge aging population so India can benefit a lot from Europe from outsourcing and also by supplying its manpower as Indians have access to english and with little effort they can learn other languages because of familarity with english.

India and China are both in the competetion of Job stealing.China is winning because it allowed very cruel capitalistic policies.A country like India cannot allow this,but there is limit .the one child labour workforce of China is not going work at very low wage rate with no suicide pact.Also tommorow or someday chinese will demand democracy for how long they will be happy with their dictators ?

[kdsingh80]

Here is analsys of india China relation and possible alliance

China’s Insensitivities to India’s National Security Interests and Vice Versa:

Lest this paper is accused of being one-sided, this part would dwell on auditing the record of both China and India in terms of respecting each other’s strategic sensitivities in terms of respective national security interests.

China’s demonstrated record in this respect appears to be focused on endangering or impinging on India’s national security interests in South Asia by the following actions:

Pakistan’s nuclear weapons and missile arsenal was built up by direct Chinese assistance.

China’s “Defence Cooperation Agreements” with Pakistan and Bangladesh, solely aimed at India. As a result both the countries get encouraged to have inimical attitudes towards India.

China’s “strategic encirclement" of India by creation of military client states on all peripheries.

China’s support of Pakistan’s stand on Kashmir, till recently.

India’s record on the other hand in terms of respecting China’s strategic sensitivities is glaringly more positive as the following would indicate:

India has supported the Chinese policy of “One China” principle.

India has respected China’s stand on the Tibet issue.

India has never supported “anti-China” activities by Tibetan exiles.

India has not, unlike China, supported any insurgent activities against China.

India has not made any efforts towards strategic encirclement of China.

India has asserted that its growing relationship with USA, precludes being part of any China containment policies of USA.

Once again, on balance, China has to modulate and refashion its policies to regain India’s trust and support and also to correct the imbalance.

http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/%5Cpapers14%5Cpaper1375.html

-- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

So it clear case that China itself is forcing India to move toward west rather than India bending its back

[dalsingh101]

Why is it India always seems to be on a back footing in internal situations like this? It really reinforces the stereotype of the 'cowardly Hindoos'.

If what KDS is saying is true, then India needs to play it smart and avoid conflict. No doubt the west would play up to threats to flog more weapons that way.

Whilst taking advantage of the west is advantageous to an extent, over playing this could lead to an unhealthy dependence. Besides India itself has a massive untapped market (hence all the western interest), and this could easily be taken advantage of to develop a high degree of self sufficiency. Plus we know Indians can do jobs as well as any whiteys from their success abroad, so the capability is there.

All it needs is some visionary leadership.

Edited May 13, 2011 by dalsingh101

[Mithar]

Whether Badal is stooge or not reality is his party get maximum number of sikh votes.Also please tell why will sikh youth will support China when they themselves have Dreams of USA,Canada UK .If China West conflict will grow then chances of Sikhs immigrating to these countries will get less as they will also be seen as ally of China.

I did not mention Sikh youths. I said Sikh leaders. Badal is useless as a leader. But in the future if and whenever we have a useful visionary leader, it would be wise on his part to look beyond India (look beyond the well) and establish relations independently of Delhi. Sikhs need to stop caring "what will Indians think" type mentality. Sikh leaders need to think of the Panth first and then anyone else second. For a Sikh leader the interests of the Panth should be first rather then thinking "what about this or that"? Due to globalization, Sikhs need to think globally rather then being stuck in the well.

In 1962 China was in near conflict with soviet over border .Soviet was much superior at that time.Also I heard that USA supplied lot of material to India in 1962.As far media is concerned there are many leftists journalists Which tried their level best that India and China can become friend but it is always the China that give an edge to Anti chinese media.China said that arunachal people will not need any visa for China as they are part of China ,I don't think India ever said that about separate visas for Tibetans also please remember China's demand for Arunachal got much more vocal in last 15 years while India has not increased its Tibetan support

In 1962, the China Soviet conflict had just begun, but it was not serious enough to cause a war between the two. That was much later in the late 60s which eventually split the communist world in two camps. In 1962 war, China had actually over run and occupied Arunanchal, they still gave it back to India after the war because Arunanchal was not their objective. If they really wanted Arunanchal they would have simply kept it and not give it back and India could have done nothing at the time. Arunanchal is only now used as a scare tactic. You need to understand in the world of diplomacy this is common.

And who was the ideal of nehru? It was soviet and anti west feeling

I still don't understand what this has got to do with India's good relations with Soviets. Nehru being a bumb idiot is his own doing not the soviet union's fault. If a family has a Nalayak foolish son, you cannot blame the neighbors for this just because the foolish Nalayak son has friendly relation with the neighbor.

Russia and China now are different from the realities of the cold war. Russia will be a 1st world economy within 2 decades and China will surpass the US in a decade as the largest economy. The winds of change are blowing at a different direction and India should realize this and have good relations with China. Russia knows what the west is up to which is why they are trying to make India and China come close to one another.

[dalsingh101]

I did not mention Sikh youths. I said Sikh leaders. Badal is useless as a leader. But in the future if and whenever we have a useful visionary leader, it would be wise on his part to look beyond India (look beyond the well) and establish relations independently of Delhi. Sikhs need to stop caring "what will Indians think" type mentality. Sikh leaders need to think of the Panth first and then anyone else second. For a Sikh leader the interests of the Panth should be first rather then thinking "what about this or that"? Due to globalization, Sikhs need to think globally rather then being stuck in the well.

Although this seems like commonsense, I can't even imagine how our people would do this.

We seem to have NOTHING to negotiate with as a people. No oil or other sought after natural resources. No intellect (like Jews) so we can corner things others struggle with (i.e legal, financial, media). No services skills, no manufacture. Instead we go abroad and generally do donkey, physical work mostly.

Let's face it, we are small fish in global terms. Minnows.

Before we can do anything, we need modern, progressive leadership in Panjab to put us on the table. Plus we have to ask, what effect would us becoming consuming machines of western products have? I think disease and all sorts to stupidity in our quom is going to come with this. Plus, it looks like it is neigh on impossible for anyone who is not an arsehole to become a Sikh 'leader' in India.

[kdsingh80]

I did not mention Sikh youths. I said Sikh leaders. Badal is useless as a leader. But in the future if and whenever we have a useful visionary leader, it would be wise on his part to look beyond India (look beyond the well) and establish relations independently of Delhi. Sikhs need to stop caring "what will Indians think" type mentality. Sikh leaders need to think of the Panth first and then anyone else second. For a Sikh leader the interests of the Panth should be first rather then thinking "what about this or that"? Due to globalization, Sikhs need to think globally rather then being stuck in the well.

How could Sikh leaders go in left directions and Sikh youths go in right.Leaders need support of people

they will only support that leader who will help them to fulfill their dreams .Our youths have dreams of going to west.

Sikhs have their bases in canada,UK, USA.Forget about India China relation Sikhs always have to be with the west.Just because of some fantansies that China -sikh relations may be useful for Sikhs in future the sikh leaders cannot

afford to turn their back on ground reality

Also I would like to know how will China help Sikhs? It is only possible if China succeeded in breaking India into pieces then we can hope that China and Pakistan may be generous enough to give us our home country O/W there is no way China could help us apart from if it allow us to be their cheap labour

In 1962, the China Soviet conflict had just begun, but it was not serious enough to cause a war between the two. That was much later in the late 60s which eventually split the communist world in two camps. In 1962 war, China had actually over run and occupied Arunanchal, they still gave it back to India after the war because Arunanchal was not their objective. If they really wanted Arunanchal they would have simply kept it and not give it back and India could have done nothing at the time. Arunanchal is only now used as a scare tactic. You need to understand in the world of diplomacy this is common.

No one knows the exact reason why China retreated from Arunachal but it is a fact that invasions many times proves to be costly.A large invading army always need huge supllies .Just remember world war two the mighty Germans lost to soviets because they ran out of supllies.Who knows what was the exact reason Soviet supply or whatever.Some war experts even say that China did not have infrastructure to properly supply material in 1962 for long time.

Also in 1962 there was nothing in Arunachal that could had attract China but now Scientists have discovered that arunachal has potential of 60,000 MW of power generation through Dams.Why will China give up such a huge resource?

India import 1.5 lakh crore of rupees items from China and China roughly import half of that amount but still China irritate India sometimes by claiming Arunachal people don't need visa ,and by helping enemies of India especially Pakistan.

Ignoring China at present will be like ignoring Nazi Germany by UK and France and they paid the price

I still don't understand what this has got to do with India's good relations with Soviets. Nehru being a bumb idiot is his own doing not the soviet union's fault. If a family has a Nalayak foolish son, you cannot blame the neighbors for this just because the foolish Nalayak son has friendly relation with the neighbor.

Soviet just used Nehru and made India its puppet.Just remember Lal bahadur shastri's cold blooded murder by soviets.Isn't it surprising how a PM of country dies of poisoning and no one even dare from that country raised a voice this shows how much India was in grip of soviet