Sahib Posted March 19, 2014 Report Share Posted March 19, 2014 Sadly i am one of those guys who always try to look for science in religions...like trying to find reasons for every thing every religion ever path to god..though i knoe this can be my biggest barrier in spiritual progress 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harsharan000 Posted March 20, 2014 Report Share Posted March 20, 2014 So then leave the analyzing bro, at least to an extent. Everything starts and revolves aroud that Supreme Being Wahiguru, who is "aparam paar". The wonder of wonders. Does not the Bani say: Sochay soch na hovaee, jeh sochay lakha vaar. He is nothing as such to be compared to in this world, either in the astral or causal spheres, so to say, to have and idea about Him. As anything under analisis, is the job of the mind. And He is beyond that. So just leave everything, and jump in that Satnam Samundar. Wahiguru Akal Purukh is something much more to be felt, than to be thought about. Anyhow this is my humble personal thought. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sahib Posted March 20, 2014 Author Report Share Posted March 20, 2014 Yea.. somehow i even know that..but this mind is a admin cut 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sahib Posted March 20, 2014 Author Report Share Posted March 20, 2014 Lol..i just said b**ch 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAL 07 Posted March 20, 2014 Report Share Posted March 20, 2014 Sadly i am one of those guys who always try to look for science in religions...like trying to find reasons for every thing every religion ever path to god..though i knoe this can be my biggest barrier in spiritual progress "If religion doesn't pass the test of science don't follow it" Dalai Lama 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dalsingh101 Posted March 21, 2014 Report Share Posted March 21, 2014 Thing is, science is about hard cause and effect. Religion deals with the emotional, personal experience of life so science can be helpful to a certain extent but useless in much. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
savinderpalsingh Posted March 22, 2014 Report Share Posted March 22, 2014 science is not even at a level for what Guru sahib has described and will take a lot of yeears to be at that level 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mekhane'ch Jannat Posted March 22, 2014 Report Share Posted March 22, 2014 Science first makes a hypothesis, it then attempts to prove this hypothesis by experimentation. If the hypothesis proves to be observable and measurable, it becomes accepted as scientific truth. Until someone else can prove its falsity through the same method. If we leave aside the fact of large corporations bribing scientists, science must always be continuously updated therefore the only constant is the scientific method itself. Which is itself an *idea* not itself accountable to scientific method. The *idea* of the scientific method is accountable to a different disciple called 'metaphysics'. This name signifies 'above nature' or the subject of 'principles of order above the changing principle'. Or in Indian terms the knowledge of the effects of Purusha on Prakriti. (Experimental science only deals with Prakriti). This knowledge has traditionally been the domain of religion. Modern science has refused to accept this knowledge and calls it mumbo-jumbo. Religion as the repository of the knowledge of the 'Effects of Purusha on Prakriti' is not limited to a subjective emotional experience but stands above all mundane knowledge and creates order within it. By mundane knowledge is meant history, politics etc. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.