Jump to content

"RSS was silent during the 1984 riots"


paapiman

Recommended Posts

Quote

But what is surprising, in terms of contemporary relevance of it, is the fact that members of the RSS-BJP [Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh-Bharatiya Janata Party] were completely silent about it then. It was much later that they opened their mouth and began to blame the Congress for it.

Unquote[1]

[1] - https://scroll.in/article/766550/rss-was-silent-during-the-1984-riots-at-places-it-was-implicated-in-the-violence

 

Bhul chuk maaf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, paapiman said:

Quote

But what is surprising, in terms of contemporary relevance of it, is the fact that members of the RSS-BJP [Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh-Bharatiya Janata Party] were completely silent about it then. It was much later that they opened their mouth and began to blame the Congress for it.

Unquote[1]

[1] - https://scroll.in/article/766550/rss-was-silent-during-the-1984-riots-at-places-it-was-implicated-in-the-violence

 

Bhul chuk maaf

they were saving Sikhs at that time i had heard of stories in Delhi and in the city where i reside i saw a live example wherein the house i had rented the owner was Sikh and had neighbors who were rss members ..when the mob came these rss members stood outside his house not allowing anyone to enter and claiming it was their house. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, paapiman said:

But what is surprising, in terms of contemporary relevance of it, is the fact that members of the RSS-BJP [Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh-Bharatiya Janata Party] were completely silent about it then. It was much later that they opened their mouth and began to blame the Congress for it.

Only to get Sikh votes. It was the BJP who were egging indira to attack the Sikhs. vajpai himself asked why indira was holding back. Now these neo-bjp'ers want us to beleive that they are our friends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, chatanga1 said:

Sure, but so were some congress workers, as well as muslims.

So true in general. Any act (good/bad) is done by a person and therefore should not be dogmatically associated to certain association. Obviously, when the person belongs to certain association, the association's name is bound to be used. But in general, it is the Person's Act and sometimes collection of persons do run associations on the shared principles which eventually gets corrupted. This line of thinking always help in all situations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, chatanga1 said:

Sure, but so were some congress workers, as well as muslims.

muslim contribution are stray cases..congress workers saving Sikhs i haven't heard of . I mean they had orders from Rajiv Gandhi directly who is said to have personally supervised...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/7/2018 at 5:07 PM, paapiman said:

But what is surprising, in terms of contemporary relevance of it, is the fact that members of the RSS-BJP [Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh-Bharatiya Janata Party] were completely silent about it then. It was much later that they opened their mouth and began to blame the Congress for it.

Unquote[1]

[1] - https://scroll.in/article/766550/rss-was-silent-during-the-1984-riots-at-places-it-was-implicated-in-the-violence

 Scorll.in is a biased website  maintained  by anti-social and anti-national far left in India. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...