Popular Post Premi Posted January 6, 2022 Popular Post Report Share Posted January 6, 2022 https://www.easterneye.biz/lord-ahmed-found-guilty-of-child-sex-offences/ Lord Ahmed found guilty of child sex offences Pramod Thomas 05 January, 2022 Lord Nazir Ahmed (Photo by Christopher Furlong/Getty Images) By: Pramod Thomas A former Labour peer has been found guilty of sexual offences against two children in the 1970s, reported the BBC. Lord Ahmed of Rotherham was convicted of a serious sexual assault against a boy and the attempted rape of a young girl. Sheffield Crown Court heard the repeated sexual abuse that happened in Rotherham when he was a teenager, the report added. Ahmed, 64, whose real name is Nazir Ahmed, had denied the charges. Judge Justice Lavender will decide later when Lord Ahmed will be sentenced. According to prosecutor Tom Little QC, Lord Ahmed had attempted to rape the girl in the early 1970s, when the defendant was aged 16 or 17 but she was much younger. During the same period, the attack on the boy, who was aged under 11 also happened. Lord Ahmed claimed the allegations were a “malicious fiction”. However, a phone recording of a 2016 conversation between the two victims showed they were not “made-up or concocted”. The woman’s call was prompted by an email from the male victim saying: “I have evidence against that paedophile,” the jury previously heard. Lord Ahmed was charged along with his two older brothers, Mohammed Farouq, 71, and Mohammed Tariq, 65, but both were deemed unfit to stand trial. Both had faced charges of indecent assault against the same boy abused by Lord Ahmed. According to the BBC report, Lord Ahmed resigned from the House of Lords in November 2020 after a conduct committee report concluded he had sexually and emotionally exploited a vulnerable woman who sought his help. The inquiry into his behaviour followed a BBC Newsnight investigation. The report made him the first peer to be recommended for expulsion but he resigned before this could be implemented. “By these verdicts, the jury has clearly decided that no matter the delay between the offences and the trial, and the defences raised, they could be sure that the accounts of the victims were credible and true,” Rosemary Ainslie, head of the Crown Prosecution Service’s special crime division, was quoted as saying by the BBC. “One of these defendants held a position of power, influence and responsibility for some time in the House of Lords but this case clearly illustrates that where there is sufficient evidence, even in challenging cases, the CPS will bring a prosecution, put evidence before a jury and see rightful convictions.” 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post dalsingh101 Posted January 6, 2022 Popular Post Report Share Posted January 6, 2022 Surprise, surprise........ 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post GurjantGnostic Posted January 6, 2022 Popular Post Report Share Posted January 6, 2022 1 hour ago, dalsingh101 said: Surprise, surprise........ I know. I was shocked too. Lol. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post GurjantGnostic Posted January 7, 2022 Popular Post Report Share Posted January 7, 2022 16 hours ago, Premi said: One of these defendants held a position of power, influence and responsibility for some time in the House of Lords but this case clearly illustrates that where there is sufficient evidence, even in challenging cases, the CPS will bring a prosecution, put evidence before a jury and see rightful convictions.” Mmm that or for one reason or another he's expendable. I mean, how long they sit on that file? Since the 70s. His dark pact bought him 50 years. Not a bad deal with the devils. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post dalsingh101 Posted January 7, 2022 Popular Post Report Share Posted January 7, 2022 22 hours ago, Premi said: Lord Ahmed was charged along with his two older brothers, Mohammed Farouq, 71, and Mohammed Tariq, 65, but both were deemed unfit to stand trial. Both had faced charges of indecent assault against the same boy abused by Lord Ahmed. Keeping it in the family...... 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dalsingh101 Posted January 7, 2022 Report Share Posted January 7, 2022 14 hours ago, GurjantGnostic said: Mmm that or for one reason or another he's expendable. I mean, how long they sit on that file? Since the 70s. His dark pact bought him 50 years. Not a bad deal with the devils. Do you reckon they threw a brown one under the bus in order to placate the masses, and to show that they take these things seriously and to protect the white ones? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post GurjantGnostic Posted January 7, 2022 Popular Post Report Share Posted January 7, 2022 1 hour ago, dalsingh101 said: Do you reckon they threw a brown one under the bus in order to placate the masses, and to show that they take these things seriously and to protect the white ones? I think maybe he could have been used as such, but ..the time he spent free, working in government, only to catch charges in his older age? That sounds like a rock group that sells its soul for seven years of success only to then have to pay a price. His sacrifice could be a diversion, but from what? Are brits clamoring for a high ranking pedo head or is the timing of this conducive to some agenda? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Premi Posted January 7, 2022 Author Popular Post Report Share Posted January 7, 2022 12 hours ago, dalsingh101 said: Keeping it in the family...... Didn't see the part about the brothers, not that old but both "were deemed unfit to stand trial" - Doubt it 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post GurjantGnostic Posted January 7, 2022 Popular Post Report Share Posted January 7, 2022 18 minutes ago, Premi said: Didn't see the part about the brothers, not that old but both "were deemed unfit to stand trial" - Doubt it Right bro. He's falling on the grenade they all three pulled the pin out of. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post dalsingh101 Posted January 7, 2022 Popular Post Report Share Posted January 7, 2022 Just now, GurjantGnostic said: Right bro. He's falling on the grenade they all three pulled the pin out of. Sacrificial lamb. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post dalsingh101 Posted January 7, 2022 Popular Post Report Share Posted January 7, 2022 How comes all the three brothers have different surnames too? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GurjantGnostic Posted January 7, 2022 Report Share Posted January 7, 2022 1 hour ago, dalsingh101 said: How comes all the three brothers have different surnames too? Oh ho ho. Is one of them whiter? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Premi Posted January 8, 2022 Author Popular Post Report Share Posted January 8, 2022 13 hours ago, dalsingh101 said: How comes all the three brothers have different surnames too? Wonder if it's in general terms, some way to assist in making it difficult to connect relatives together when they are doing business deals or kartootan 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post GurjantGnostic Posted January 8, 2022 Popular Post Report Share Posted January 8, 2022 1 hour ago, Premi said: Wonder if it's in general terms, some way to assist in making it difficult to connect relatives together when they are doing business deals or kartootan Nice thinkin Ji. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Premi Posted January 15, 2022 Author Popular Post Report Share Posted January 15, 2022 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premi Posted March 17, 2023 Author Report Share Posted March 17, 2023 Just saw this, what the....?! Quote The Court of Appeal has cut the jail term given to former Labour peer Lord Ahmed of Rotherham for sexually abusing two children in the 1970s..... He was jailed for five years and six months at Sheffield Crown Court in February 2022. Three Appeal Court judges have reduced the term to two years and six months. Lord Burnett, the Lord Chief Justice; Lord Justice Holroyde and Lord Justice William Davis concluded the original trial judge Mr Justice Lavender "fell into error" when passing sentence https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-south-yorkshire-64989574 Lord Ahmed: Peer's prison sentence cut by appeal court Published 3 minutes ago Share IMAGE SOURCE,PA MEDIA Image caption, Ahmed, pictured at his sentencing in 2022, had challenged his original jail term By Brian Farmer PA The Court of Appeal has cut the jail term given to former Labour peer Lord Ahmed of Rotherham for sexually abusing two children in the 1970s. Ahmed was convicted, under his birth name Nazir Ahmed, of trying to rape a young girl and sexually assaulting a boy under 11. He was jailed for five years and six months at Sheffield Crown Court in February 2022. Three Appeal Court judges have reduced the term to two years and six months. Lord Burnett, the Lord Chief Justice; Lord Justice Holroyde and Lord Justice William Davis concluded the original trial judge Mr Justice Lavender "fell into error" when passing sentence. Their decision followed a hearing in London in January. Ahmed had challenged Mr Justice Lavender's sentencing decision and the appeal judges made a ruling in his favour. They said the fact that Ahmed was a child when he committed offences had to be taken into account. During his original trial, the court heard the abuse happened in Rotherham when Ahmed was a teenager. He had attempted to rape the girl on two occasions when he was aged about 16 or 17 and she was much younger. The attack on the boy also happened during the same period. Ahmed was found guilty of two counts of attempted rape against the girl and a serious sexual assault against the boy. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GurjantGnostic Posted March 17, 2023 Report Share Posted March 17, 2023 4 hours ago, Premi said: Just saw this, what the....?! https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-south-yorkshire-64989574 Lord Ahmed: Peer's prison sentence cut by appeal court Published 3 minutes ago Share IMAGE SOURCE,PA MEDIA Image caption, Ahmed, pictured at his sentencing in 2022, had challenged his original jail term By Brian Farmer PA The Court of Appeal has cut the jail term given to former Labour peer Lord Ahmed of Rotherham for sexually abusing two children in the 1970s. Ahmed was convicted, under his birth name Nazir Ahmed, of trying to rape a young girl and sexually assaulting a boy under 11. He was jailed for five years and six months at Sheffield Crown Court in February 2022. Three Appeal Court judges have reduced the term to two years and six months. Lord Burnett, the Lord Chief Justice; Lord Justice Holroyde and Lord Justice William Davis concluded the original trial judge Mr Justice Lavender "fell into error" when passing sentence. Their decision followed a hearing in London in January. Ahmed had challenged Mr Justice Lavender's sentencing decision and the appeal judges made a ruling in his favour. They said the fact that Ahmed was a child when he committed offences had to be taken into account. During his original trial, the court heard the abuse happened in Rotherham when Ahmed was a teenager. He had attempted to rape the girl on two occasions when he was aged about 16 or 17 and she was much younger. The attack on the boy also happened during the same period. Ahmed was found guilty of two counts of attempted rape against the girl and a serious sexual assault against the boy. Lets see a year with good behavior in a comfy jail for peerage pdfiles? Justice clearly. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.