Jump to content

Bhagat Singh was a terrorist!


shastarSingh

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, shastarSingh said:

https://www.facebook.com/100050850813377/posts/pfbid02wAQgSZnLJmuGNqnT4xG5tx9hbtKt7KE7E1HUb3GmKZDYMaRLLhQG3sseLm1puqjSl/

Simon commission was about constitutional reforms and rights for dalits, backward farmers and minorities.

Sir Chhoturam welcomed simon commission.

Bhagat Singh and lala lajpat Rai opposed it.

Even the great dalit leader Dr. Ambedkar supported Simon commission.

Screenshot_20220717-132723.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/16/2022 at 5:48 PM, proudkaur said:

how? He is  right. Indian state used to itself call bhagat singh terrorist until they wanted sikhs to forget their own martyrs and imposed this bhagat singh dude as a shaheed on sikhs in the 80s. I dont know what bhagat singh has done that 1000s of sikhs have not in the past already? Also bhagat singh ended up killing innocent people too so why is the killer of beant singh called a terrorist and not bhagat singh? Indians have reserved the word terrorist for people who dont agree with their nonsense and revolt against it.Can someone give me one reason bhagat singh is considered so "special" and please shed light on how his communist beliefs would have been good?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/16/2022 at 1:45 PM, proudkaur said:

bhagat singh killed him accidentally though not because of he was a chumcha of goras.

I believe it was Rajguru that killed the turban-wearing collaborator.

As for Bhagat Singh he became Amritdhari right at the end thanks to Bhai Randhir Singh Ji and rejected his erstwhile beliefs that Islam, Hinduism and Sikhi are equally bad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/16/2022 at 1:34 PM, dalsingh101 said:

In colonial times, apnay started sidelining Dasam Granth because they thought it was 'hindu'. 

No brother, with respect, in fact it was because the racist British-sponsored 1849+1897 Sodhak Committees sponsored the promotion of Bachittar Natak + Triya Charitar.

It was those who fought against + opposed the racist British Empire that threw out Bachittar Natak + Charitropakihiyan pothi'an from Sri Harmandir Sahib (Gurdwara Sudhar Lehar) 100years ago.

Whereas those who were loyal to the racist British Empire supported the propogation of BN and CP whilst prostitutes danced at our Gurdwareh under the pro-British Mahants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/18/2022 at 2:41 AM, Singh2022 said:

I believe it was Rajguru that killed the turban-wearing collaborator.

As for Bhagat Singh he became Amritdhari right at the end thanks to Bhai Randhir Singh Ji and rejected his erstwhile beliefs that Islam, Hinduism and Sikhi are equally bad

Bhagat Singh didn’t take Amrit after meeting Bhai Sahib. On they day after Bhai Sahib met Bhagat Singh, he wrote a book called ‘Why am I an Atheist’. Also Bhai Sahib has written against Bhagat Singh and called him out in their writings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/17/2022 at 9:48 PM, Singh2022 said:

No brother, with respect, in fact it was because the racist British-sponsored 1849+1897 Sodhak Committees sponsored the promotion of Bachittar Natak + Triya Charitar.

It was those who fought against + opposed the racist British Empire that threw out Bachittar Natak + Charitropakihiyan pothi'an from Sri Harmandir Sahib (Gurdwara Sudhar Lehar) 100years ago.

Whereas those who were loyal to the racist British Empire supported the propogation of BN and CP whilst prostitutes danced at our Gurdwareh under the pro-British Mahants.

One of the passages from Sri Bachittar Natak saab was recited during the First Amrit Sanchar by Sri Satguru jee himself.

Do you believe that the entire Sri Bachittar Natak saab was not written by Sri Satguru jee (Tenth Master)? It definitely has a lot or Beer Ras in it.

 

Bhul chuk maaf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, paapiman said:

One of the passages from Sri Bachittar Natak saab was recited during the First Amrit Sanchar by Sri Satguru jee himself.

Do you believe that the entire Sri Bachittar Natak saab was not written by Sri Satguru jee (Tenth Master)? It definitely has a lot or Beer Ras in it.

 

Bhul chuk maaf

We know which passage? Which account is that from?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/20/2022 at 12:16 PM, aaronsingh said:

Bhagat Singh didn’t take Amrit after meeting Bhai Sahib.

With respect Ji, I didn't say that. I am aware that initially Bhagat Singh was skeptical about the Truth that Bhai Randhir Singh Ji were sharing with him.

It it true that Bhagat Singh held the view that because Islam and Hinduism are religions which have inflicted suffering upon millions that Gurmat must be equally evil.

However, before Bhagat Singh was hanged he did realise that Sikhi is the only truth striving for the upliftment of all humanity and became Amrithdari as we clearly see in the photographic evidence of Bhagat Singh as a Sabat Soorat GurSikh on the day of his death.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...