Narendra Modi Led Nda Win Landslide Victory In Indian Elections

[kdsingh80]

NDA 334 BJP 284

UPA 61

Others 147

Congress received its worst ever drubbing with only 47 seats

[chatanga1]

how did Mayawati's party do?

[kdsingh80]

how did Mayawati's party do?

0 seat

[tonyhp32]

One good outcome was that AAP won 4 seats and came a close second in another. Their total vote was only a mere 2 % less than SAD. Bhagwant Mann has the making of a future CM of Punjab provided they now consolidate their gains and start to represent the interests of Punjab in Delhi something that the SAD never did. After the SAD converted itself from being a Panthic party to being a Punjabi party there has been a need for another party to take the mantle of the Panthic party. SAD (Amritsar) failed to do this and so given that the AAP gained the maximum votes from Sikhs in the rural areas of Malwa and that AAP in Punjab is already seen as a Sikh centric party having had candidates with a Panthic background stand in the elections such as Harinder Singh Khalsa who won and Harvinder Singh Phoolka who came a close second. Shergill the lawyer for the Sikh farmers of Kutch got over 3 lakh votes in these elections. This shows that the Panthic vote went to the AAP.

Another good outcome was that the Lala Jaitley who had given out ladoos to celebrate Bluestar got a humiliating defeat from Amarinder Singh who was just a few months ago seen as a spent force. It looks like the Sikhs voted to stop the anti-Sikh lala from winning the seat.

[tonyhp32]

outrageous attempt to hijack what has been a wonderful start for a secular party in Punjab.

In a country where democracy is based on a secular Constitution (fanatically secular nehru ensured the separation of church and state), there is no place for 'panth' in politics and should be vice versa too. anyone who misuses religion in a political campaign should be automatically disqualified for at least two terms. You have SGPC elections to take out your putrid sectarian steam, keep your hands off our democracy.

Shergill of AAP got 3 lakh votes from a Hindu majority constituency (Anandpur sahib) won by an Akali so stop dishing out this typically divisive crap that AAP is neo-panthic party made successful by Sikh votes.

As far as 'Lala' Jaitley is concerned, AAP is led by a 'Vande matram' shouting Bania kejriwal. chuppo ganne

So what is the BJP dumba$$? a secular party?

Anandpur Sahib is a Sikh dominated seat although it contains Hindu dominated areas of Nawanshahr and Anandpur Sahib it also contains the Sikh dominated tehsils of Rupar, Mohali, Chamkaur Sahib and Kharar. Balachaur, and Garhshankar are equally split.

Did Kejriwal give out ladoos in 1984? You can't compare a typical cowardly lala like Jaitley with Kejriwal.

[amar_jkp]

outrageous attempt to hijack what has been a wonderful start for a secular party in Punjab.

In a country where democracy is based on a secular Constitution (fanatically secular nehru ensured the separation of church and state), there is no place for 'panth' in politics and should be vice versa too. anyone who misuses religion in a political campaign should be automatically disqualified for at least two terms. You have SGPC elections to take out your putrid sectarian steam, keep your hands off our democracy.

Shergill of AAP got 3 lakh votes from a Hindu majority constituency (Anandpur sahib) won by an Akali so stop dishing out this typically divisive crap that AAP is neo-panthic party made successful by Sikh votes.

As far as 'Lala' Jaitley is concerned, AAP is led by a 'Vande matram' shouting Bania kejriwal. chuppo ganne

Bania Kejriwal is not Punjabi Bania like you .

[tonyhp32]

Just had underline my previous point that the AAP victory was mainly down to Sikh votes, I just had a look at the votes received by H S Phoolka.

As you can see the Sikh dominated rural areas of Jagraon, Dakha and Gill and the urban areas of Ludhiana west which includes the Sikh villages which have come within the city limits in the last few years have voted for Phoolka and the Hindu urban areas voted for Bittu and Ayali. It gives a lie to Sher's contention that AAP's performance was due to both the Hindu and Sikh votes. In Jagraon Phoolka got 54% of the votes cast in what was a four way contest. The Sikh Panthic vote which wanted to punish Badal and the BJP found a home with the AAP especially as the AAP candidates had a background in fighting for Panthic causes. This should be something that SAD (Amritsar) and Dal Khalsa and other Panthic organisations should be looking at. As for Phoolka in Jagraon what is amazing is that apart for a whirlwind road show a week before the elections there was virtually no electioneering apart from a car going around the villages asking for votes. One hardly saw any Phoolka posters especially in the villages north of Jagraon. Bains actually had more posters in the Jagroan villages than either of the others and yet he got the least amount of votes! Seems like that idi.ot must have wasted crores of rupees on this election In the last few days Ayali had been telephoning all the Sarpanches telling them to make sure that he won the vote in their villages. Most people would tell the Sarpanch what he wanted to hear than they would vote for Ayali but among themselves they would tell the truth that they would vote for 'jharoo' (AAP)

I did hear that in some villages to the south west of Jagroan, Ayali and Kler (the Jagraon Akali MLA) were thrown out when they went to ask for votes. They had reportedly offered some lakh to the village panchayat to vote for them and an NRI had said that he would give Ayali and Kler the same amount just to pi$$ off from the village!

Edited May 18, 2014 by tonyhp32

[tonyhp32]

The funny thing is that on social media you have all these Hindu fanatics criticising the Sikhs and accusing them of betraying the Modi wave! It seems that Hindus can votes of mass murderers like Rajeev Gandhi and Modi and call it a national wave but the Sikhs aren't allowed to vote against their enemies like Jaitley. The biggest loudmouth protests are from the Hindu lalas of Amritstar who can't handle the fact that the Sikhs did not want to vote for a Lala from Dehli as their representative. It seems that the Sikh voters have shown that they are more intelligent than the Hindus who voted for Vinod Khanna and made his victorious in Gurdaspur. This will the last time they will see him until the next Lok Sabha elections!

[Amandeep Hindustani]

Jaitely is your enemy?

I see what you are doing with Kejriwal. You want to use his shoulder to fire at Badal because you have been incapable yourselves. Some Bania Lala is leading you. LOL!

[tonyhp32]

Your analysis is not convincing for so many reasons. You have mentioned the figures for Jagraon where Phoolka got the maximum dough (pun intended) or 62 percent. Now i quote from one of your own post on this forum:

"Sikhs were 48.8% of Jagraon town in 1981, went up to 55% in 1991 and were 55.41% in 2001"

Hindus are, acc to the figures provided by you, nearly 45 percent in this constituency. the MLA from Jagraon is also a 'Hindu'.

I would like to add that AAP also played a communal card in Punjab by fielding 12/13 Sikh candidates. the only non-Sikh candidate btw won (patiala Dharamveer Gandhi). i am not denying that religion would not have paid any role but other factors (the profile of the candidate, caste configurations, election campaign, the profile/popularity of other candidates), etc. also played significant roles otherwise Dharamveer gandhi would ot have won on AAP ticket and Dr Daljit singh (AAP) would not have finished on number 3 in Sikh majority seat of Amritsar. Khadoor sahib even better example. overwhelmingly sikh majority seat and AAP candidate finished 3rd losing to the winner by 3 lakh votes (<5,000 votes Khemkaran and <10,000 from Patti!!).

AAP candidate Jyoti Mann (3rd overall) in jalandhar did very well from Hindu majority city areas but not so well in the rural constituencies.

once again, you are blinded by hatred for Hindus and would go to any length to denounce them. pathetic.

Wrong. Jagraon assembly constituency includes Jagroan town which has a 55% Sikh majority and the overwhelming Sikh majority rural areas where the Sikhs are over 90%. So the assembly constituency is overwhelming Sikh.

The AAP only fielded 10 out of 13 candidates who were Sikh. Apart from Gandhi, there was Satnam Paul Kamboj from Ferozpur and Yamini Gomar from Hoshiarpur. But your point is well taken and confirms what I have pointed out that the chief supporters of AAP in Punjab were Sikhs and hence the reason why AAP chose a majority of Sikh candidates. Although social media was full of photos of AAP volunteers in Ludhiana city with their 'aam aadmi' hats supporting H S Phoolka, it was the Sikh majority rural areas that voted for him in a big way.

Wrong. You need to credit Sikh voters with a lot more intelligence than you seem to do. In areas where the AAP candidate was weak the Sikh voters especially the Panthic voters went to the best alternative to give the Akalis and BJP a bloody nose. This was the case in Amritsar where Lala Jaitley had been convinced the Akali idiots that he would win by a margin of 1.5 lakh votes! He even bought a house in Amritsar thinking he could rely on the Akali fools to send him to parliament.

Like Amritsar, the AAP candidate from Bathinda was weak and hence the Panthic vote went for Manpreet Badal because it was essential to defeat Badal's daughter in law. As it was she won by pnly 19,000 votes whereas again the Akalis were making tall claims of winning the seat by another 1.5 lakh votes. She hasn't even taken out a victory parade and has legged it to Delhi. Even the papers report that Manpreet Badal has been congratulated from all sides and not one cares about Akali candidate. She managed to keep her vote by getting some dalit votes from the Congress by her party giving out 6 months of atta and dal at nominal rate of one rupee per kilo of atta and 30 rupees per kilo of dal. Her constituency has also had money thrown at it and one only needs to see the development there compared to the other areas of Punjab.

In Patiala the Hindu Punjabi is more communal than in most other areas. The Punjab bandh in 2012 in support of Bhai Rajoana saw clashes between Sikhs and HIndus. Again you are wrong here. It was in rural areas that Gandhi (even given his unfortunate surname) got the most votes.

In Jalandhar if you look at the voting strength of both Congress and Akali-BJP in the 2012 assembly elections compared to this election then it shows that Akali-BJP combine polled 144,000 votes less votes this time and the Congress only polled about 18,000 less. So the Majority of the votes that AAP got in Jalandhar was from the Akali-BJP. Now if you think that the communal Hindu Punjabi who voted for Akali-BJP in 2012 is going to vote for a party which has done more for Sikhs in a few months then other parties have done on 30 years and in spite of the Modi wave in the rest of the country then you really need your head examining!

[tonyhp32]

Wrong. Jagraon assembly constituency includes Jagroan town which has a 55% Sikh majority and the overwhelming Sikh majority rural areas where the Sikhs are over 90%. So the assembly constituency is overwhelming Sikh.

The AAP only fielded 10 out of 13 candidates who were Sikh. Apart from Gandhi, there was Satnam Paul Kamboj from Ferozpur and Yamini Gomar from Hoshiarpur. But your point is well taken and confirms what I have pointed out that the chief supporters of AAP in Punjab were Sikhs and hence the reason why AAP chose a majority of Sikh candidates. Although social media was full of photos of AAP volunteers in Ludhiana city with their 'aam aadmi' hats supporting H S Phoolka, it was the Sikh majority rural areas that voted for him in a big way.

Wrong. You need to credit Sikh voters with a lot more intelligence than you seem to do. In areas where the AAP candidate was weak the Sikh voters especially the Panthic voters went to the best alternative to give the Akalis and BJP a bloody nose. This was the case in Amritsar where Lala Jaitley had been convinced the Akali idiots that he would win by a margin of 1.5 lakh votes! He even bought a house in Amritsar thinking he could rely on the Akali fools to send him to parliament.

Like Amritsar, the AAP candidate from Bathinda was weak and hence the Panthic vote went for Manpreet Badal because it was essential to defeat Badal's daughter in law. As it was she won by pnly 19,000 votes whereas again the Akalis were making tall claims of winning the seat by another 1.5 lakh votes. She hasn't even taken out a victory parade and has legged it to Delhi. Even the papers report that Manpreet Badal has been congratulated from all sides and not one cares about Akali candidate. She managed to keep her vote by getting some dalit votes from the Congress by her party giving out 6 months of atta and dal at nominal rate of one rupee per kilo of atta and 30 rupees per kilo of dal. Her constituency has also had money thrown at it and one only needs to see the development there compared to the other areas of Punjab.

In Patiala the Hindu Punjabi is more communal than in most other areas. The Punjab bandh in 2012 in support of Bhai Rajoana saw clashes between Sikhs and HIndus. Again you are wrong here. It was in rural areas that Gandhi (even given his unfortunate surname) got the most votes.

In Jalandhar if you look at the voting strength of both Congress and Akali-BJP in the 2012 assembly elections compared to this election then it shows that Akali-BJP combine polled 144,000 votes less votes this time and the Congress only polled about 18,000 less. So the Majority of the votes that AAP got in Jalandhar was from the Akali-BJP. Now if you think that the communal Hindu Punjabi who voted for Akali-BJP in 2012 is going to vote for a party which has done more for Sikhs in a few months then other parties have done on 30 years and in spite of the Modi wave in the rest of the country then you really need your head examining!

Only twice in the last 30 years since Bluestar has there being a feeling that the elections are going to throw up a real surprise. First was the 1989 Lok Sabha polls when the Akali Dal of Simranjeet Singh Mann won 7 seats and the next one is the polls now which has shown that the Panthic vote can make a difference if only the Panthic leaders unite and take on both the Congress and Akali-BJP.

[Amandeep Hindustani]

The funny thing is that on social media you have all these Hindu fanatics criticising the Sikhs and accusing them of betraying the Modi wave! It seems that Hindus can votes of mass murderers like Rajeev Gandhi and Modi and call it a national wave but the Sikhs aren't allowed to vote against their enemies like Jaitley. The biggest loudmouth protests are from the Hindu lalas of Amritstar who can't handle the fact that the Sikhs did not want to vote for a Lala from Dehli as their representative. It seems that the Sikh voters have shown that they are more intelligent than the Hindus who voted for Vinod Khanna and made his victorious in Gurdaspur. This will the last time they will see him until the next Lok Sabha elections!

The vote was for Narendra Modi - this is an election for the PM position. You could put Britney Spears from Gurdaspur and she would have won.

Either way it doesn't matter. The objective was an outstanding success. Amit Shah is going to put his full attention on AAP, Congress in the next few months. AK-49 better learn quickly.

[tonyhp32]

Looks like some journalists have noticed how it was the Panthic votes who ensured that the AAP made such a stunning debut in Punjab.

How AAP ate into the Akali vote

YES BANK™ NRI Banking - Highest Interest Rate of 7 % p/a* on NRE/NRO Savings Account. Apply !yesbanknriservices.co.in

Ads by Google

CHANDER SUTA DOGRA

SHARE · PRINT · T+

What should worry the Akalis is that for the first time a party has cut into their traditional ‘panthic’ religious vote bank in rural Punjab

VICTORIOUS:The Punjabi appetite for venturing into areas where others fear to tread is one of the reasons why they have embraced the AAP. Picture shows AAP candidate Dharam Vira Gandhi celebrating his win in Patiala.— Photo: PTI

To describe the Aam Aadmi Party’s (AAP) surprise success in Punjab, where it won four seats and 25 per cent of the votes, as being the result of a deep anger against the high-handedness and misrule of the Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD)-Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) alliance in the State, is to present only half the picture. Given that the AAP won no seats in any other State including neighbouring Haryana, where it deployed all its might to get only 4 per cent of the votes, its stunning performance in Punjab has flummoxed rivals and its own leadership alike.

The AAP’s surge

Till today the AAP does not have a proper State unit in Punjab. Its election campaign was managed by a hurriedly put together committee of 12 persons, some of whom came over from Delhi to lend a helping hand. Its candidates were a ragtag group of little known people, some of whom were reluctant to even go out and campaign due to shortage of funds. In Faridkot for instance, Dr. Sadhu Singh, a retired principal and poet who had joined the AAP a few months ago and who won with 4,50,751 votes, had been unable to campaign in more than 10 per cent of the villages. Bhagwant Mann, the Punjabi satirist who was a runaway hit in Sangrur, and who campaigned with bands of youths following him on motorcycles from village to village, won by a margin of more than two lakh votes. Dharam Vira Gandhi, an unassuming cardiologist of Patiala, defeated Minister of State for External Affairs Preneet Kaur in an area that is considered her pocket borough.

Many are beginning to say that such a development could take place only in Punjab, because Punjabis are not afraid of taking risks. The legendary Punjabi appetite for venturing into areas where others fear to tread and receptiveness to anything new is one reason why they have embraced the fledgling party, in a manner in which no one else did. Out of the 117 assembly segments in Punjab, the AAP won in 33 and stood second in 25, which covers roughly half the State. The party’s spread spans urban and rural areas. It performed best in the State’s Malwa belt, where a deepening agrarian crisis, drug abuse and cancer have created a sense of hopelessness.

In a society that is traditionally liberal and inclusive and does not tolerate injustice or ‘ dhakka, ’ AAP workers found to their delight that people rallied around the party because they saw Arvind Kejriwal as the underdog who could deliver them from the arrogance of the Akalis. “There is a visceral anger against the Akalis and the BJP and this vote is the deep desire of the average Punjabi to teach them a lesson. [it is] equivalent to a slap,” says Professor Harish Puri, historian and Punjab watcher.

But the Sikhs are also a macho, martial race who admire strong men and have rallied around heroes like Guru Gobind Singh who stood up to the atrocities of the mighty Mughals. The difference, however, is that they like their heroes to be Sikhs and are unkind to non-Sikhs posing as strong men. “Narendra Modi’s superman image, his style of talking and his arrogant stance actually fuelled the sentiment to teach the ruling dispensation a lesson,” points out Professor Puri. “A swagger in a Sikh is welcome, but they don’t like it when a non-Sikh from outside wears it.” The ‘Modi wave,’ therefore, not only left the Sikhs untouched, but Mr. Modi was even see as ‘anti-Sikh’ by many.

This point is best illustrated by what happened in Amritsar where Captain Amarinder Singh of the Congress trounced BJP stalwart Arun Jaitley, despite the latter having everything going for him. Capt. Singh won by more than one lakh votes, making Mr. Jaitley’s loss one of the biggest upsets in the BJP’s stupendous pan-Indian performance. The story was similar in Bhatinda, too, where Manpreet Singh Badal almost wrested the seat that eventually went to his sister-in-law Harsimrat Kaur Badal, who won by a slim margin of a little more than 19,000 votes. “Both Capt. Amarinder and Manpreet were seen as Sikh strongmen who could shield the public from the atrocities of the hated Akali-BJP combine. The acceptance for a home-grown Punjabi hero is seen in both these places where these two got massive support, even though there is plenty of disillusionment with the Congress-led UPA government at the Centre,” says Dr. Pramod Kumar, a political analyst. None of the other Congress candidates — Pratap Singh Bajwa or Ambika Soni or Sunil Jakhar, all of whom lost — enjoy the same stature in Punjab’s politics. In other constituencies where there were no iconic Sikhs to look up to, the Sikhs mostly voted the AAP. The SAD-BJP combine has won six seats, one more than in 2009, but the mood is sombre in both parties, because the writing on the wall is clear.

What should worry the Akalis more is the fact that for the first time someone has come along to dent their ‘panthic’ religious vote bank in rural Punjab. The singular achievement of the AAP in the State has been the dent it has made in this core Sikh vote. Much of the credit for this goes to Mr. Kejriwal for his decision to set up a Special Investigation Team to re-investigate the 1984 riot cases. The Akalis have always taken for granted this section of voters. The AAP appealed to those who were upset with the Akalis for exploiting Sikh issues and not doing anything substantial to redress them. The radical Sikhs also rallied around the party. The AAP’s strategy — of drumming up the matter of Sikhs in Gujarat being hounded by the Modi government there — worked to build up his ‘anti-Sikh’ image, notwithstanding his posing with a turban at one of Mr. Jaitley’s rallies. The party also galvanised the leftists in the Malwa belt. Activists of the Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) who were inactive for decades were seen riding high on the AAP fervour.

Role of the NRI

Adding to this, the formidable non-resident Indian component of Punjab’s extended population, who worked overtime on social media, reached out to youngsters and rooted for the AAP, said Baljit Balli, a veteran Punjabi journalist who runs an online news portal.

Among those who won is Dr. Harinder Singh Khalsa, a former diplomat who resigned as the ambassador of Norway in 1984 in protest against Operation Bluestar. He was in exile for six years and returned in the 90s to live a quiet life. He won handsomely from Fatehgarh Sahib.

The object of the Punjabis’ unexpected ardour for the moment is the AAP and the new love affair has thrown past passions into a tizzy. No one quite knows what this augurs for the future, but the AAP certainly has the State Assembly in its crosshairs now.

chander.dogra@thehindu.co.in

AAP workers found that people rallied around the party as they saw Kejriwal as the one who could deliver them from the arrogance of the Akalis

[amar_jkp]

One thing that i never able to understand is defeat of Simranjeet Singh Mann , he is our hero but why people dont vote for him. He got only 13000 vote .

[tonyhp32]

The problem is the perception that the Sikh nationalists are split into factions. Simranjeet Singh Mann is to blame for this as well as he put up a candidate in Patiala even when there was a good candidate in Bibi Kamaldeep Kaur who eventually got over 15,000 votes compared to Mann's candidate who got less than 3,000. Had Mann supported her and then there is every likelihood she could have got votes many times the number she actually got and AAP would have lost the deat. This lack of unity contrasts with the unity shown by the AAP. AAP had also shown that a new party could win many seats as they did in Delhi so that also helped them in Punjab.

The Sikh nationalists need to take a look at what AAP has achieved. AAP used Sikh issues to propel themselves into becoming a political force. The fact that it could not do this in the rest of India shows that it was purely Punjab issues that made them a political force.

[Genie Singh]

One thing that i never able to understand is defeat of Simranjeet Singh Mann , he is our hero but why people dont vote for him. He got only 13000 vote .

He probably doesn't hand out bottles of sharab for votes for sharab most peasants of punjab particularly those who call themselve sikh are willing to sell their honour and blame lalas for their problems, when it comes to the real sikhs they call them lalas because they don't give them sharab handouts for their honour.

[amar_jkp]

Now you are talking sense and asking the correct question much closer to the ground reality.

There is seething anger against what happened in 1984 in Delhi (which Kejriwal targeted so astutely) but even that voter would not support the demand for Khalistan or rabid anti-Hindu stance of the failed khandani traitors like simranjit mann. Even in the last Assembly elections, Mann's party was routed and he lost the security deposit along with all of his candidates. a performance repeated once again in LS 2014 elections.

Its Indian Hindu state terror because of which people dont support Khalasthani demand but if we go by election result there are 28000 Khalasthani in Punjab . Mann got 13000 and Rajoana Sister got 15000 . I have always feel that demand for Anandpur Resolution should be raised again .

[amar_jkp]

The problem is the perception that the Sikh nationalists are split into factions. Simranjeet Singh Mann is to blame for this as well as he put up a candidate in Patiala even when there was a good candidate in Bibi Kamaldeep Kaur who eventually got over 15,000 votes compared to Mann's candidate who got less than 3,000. Had Mann supported her and then there is every likelihood she could have got votes many times the number she actually got and AAP would have lost the deat. This lack of unity contrasts with the unity shown by the AAP. AAP had also shown that a new party could win many seats as they did in Delhi so that also helped them in Punjab.

The Sikh nationalists need to take a look at what AAP has achieved. AAP used Sikh issues to propel themselves into becoming a political force. The fact that it could not do this in the rest of India shows that it was purely Punjab issues that made them a political force.

I agree Mann did a blunder by not supporting Rajoana Sister . Mann arrogance and not joining hands with other Panthic parties is a cause of concern .

[tonyhp32]

He probably doesn't hand out bottles of sharab for votes for sharab most peasants of punjab particularly those who call themselve sikh are willing to sell their honour and blame lalas for their problems, when it comes to the real sikhs they call them lalas because they don't give them sharab handouts for their honour.

The fact that AAP got 3.3 million votes mainly Sikh rural votes without having to give on bottle of sharab shows you are talking BS as usual. When the people see a real alternative they will votes of them in their millions.

[tonyhp32]

Rajoana sister has already banked crores of Rupees. blood dripping from every Rs in her hand...blood of the innocents killed by Rajoana and his fellow terrorists. It is worrying that 28,000 (even though v small number) people have been brainwashed and have supported the loony fringe.

Mann and the anti-Badal Akalis got over 6 Lakh votes in the SGPC elections. There are a lot more Khalistanis than you think and AAP got a lot of their votes. Khalistan is alive and well in Punjab and all it needs is a leader and then your worst nightmares will come true.

[Genie Singh]

The fact that AAP got 3.3 million votes mainly Sikh rural votes without having to give on bottle of sharab shows you are talking BS as usual. When the people see a real alternative they will votes of them in their millions.

How do you know they didn't hand out sharab? Did they not give you a bottle for your honour too?

[Amandeep Hindustani]

sitting 1000s of kms from Punjab, these khalibans have some divine powers to check what is happening in each and every house. through the same divine power they conduct instant exit polls.

AAP triumph is being hijacked now by frusto khalis. they don't realise that at best, that is when each jat and some other agrarian Sikh castes start sectarian violence of unprecedented levels or some ultra liberal becomes India's PM with like-minded majority in the parliament, Khalistan would remain a wet dream. At best once again, 4-5 punjab districts would fall to these loonies. till that Mission Impossible is achieved, khalis overseas would keep milking n exploiting vulnerable NRIs sentiments and keep this cash cow alive.

I have said this earlier in this thread or the other one. Khalistanis and their acolytes are using kejriwals shoulder to fire at Badal hoping he will fall and they will install a more katar group.

Khalistan is big business in the West. It rakes in millions for the gurudwaras in donations from where it originates.

[amar_jkp]

sitting 1000s of kms from Punjab, these khalibans have some divine powers to check what is happening in each and every house. through the same divine power they conduct instant exit polls.

AAP triumph is being hijacked now by frusto khalis. they don't realise that at best, that is when each jat and some other agrarian Sikh castes start sectarian violence of unprecedented levels or some ultra liberal becomes India's PM with like-minded majority in the parliament, Khalistan would remain a wet dream. At best once again, 4-5 punjab districts would fall to these loonies. till that Mission Impossible is achieved, khalis overseas would keep milking n exploiting vulnerable NRIs sentiments and keep this cash cow alive.

Is this a threat to Sikhs from Modi Denta Bhagat ? Khalasthan will be crated or not is a different issue question is regarding its supporters , are their number increased in last 10 yrs ? Youth coming out in support of Rajoana is a proof .

Edited May 22, 2014 by amar_jkp

[amar_jkp]

Most of the violence happened in Doaba Jalandher in city area where they burn Hindu car . I accept some have left Sikhi and have become Ravidasia mostly in Doaba are but most of Ravidasia were AD Dharmi counted as Hindus . I dont know why they have created new relegion when there is already AD Dharam . This Ravidasia Dharam will hit AD Dharam most .

Sauch Sauda - Most of the times we teach them lesson and will continue to go after them even if they are supported by Police and Hindu goons .

Person who has killed thousand muslim has become PM , i would say he has become a new demi god of Hindus thats these blood thirsty loum seen shouting HAR HAR Modi on the other hand Hindu Jihadi has problem when Sikh youth support Rajoana .

Mudate Guzri Hai Itni , Ranj-jo Gham Sehte Hue

Sharam Si Aati Hai Iss Watan Ko Watan Kehte Hue

[amar_jkp]