Amandeep Hindustani Posted June 2, 2014 Report Share Posted June 2, 2014 And I do not care about AAP. The top leadership has resigned (gopinath, ilzami and now Yogendra Yadav) and Kejriwal admits today that there is no chance he will gain power again. Done. Flop. Fail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chatanga1 Posted June 2, 2014 Report Share Posted June 2, 2014 Worst human rights records in Asia... What non-sense is that? Are you comparing India with China, North Korea, Pakistan, bangladesh, Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, nepal and now Thailand...which Asian country you are comparing India with? During the early 90s the UN Human Rights Commission placed india in the top 10 countries for practicing torture on it's OWN people. Which media one should read for news on India? Taiwanese? why not? you are very eager for the hindus to represent the news for Sikhs. Wake up my dear Taliban admiring. We are living in 2014 and not 1996. Afghan warlords understand the language of dollar more than that of jehad. 100s of billions have been invested in keeping talibans out of Kabul and the NATO would ensure that the fanatics do not get to control Afghanistan ever again. and it's worked in your opinion? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnPathToSikhi Posted June 3, 2014 Report Share Posted June 3, 2014 i remind you once again, we are living in 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amar_jkp Posted June 3, 2014 Report Share Posted June 3, 2014 Law and order situation in India is very Bad . Indian capital Delhi has become rape capital of world . Police is corrupt and biased. . Conflict between Hindus and Muslims are increasing day by day . Indian Muslims will destroy Hindusthan from within . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amar_jkp Posted June 3, 2014 Report Share Posted June 3, 2014 Government should ban the nonsense use of loudspeakers in mosques immediately. Ban discriminatory, risk prone, disturbing and anti-Hindu loudspeakers in mosques. Why Government should ban the nonsense use of loudspeakers in mosques and any illicit use of it in other religious and social programmes. ~ Upananda Brahmachari. Ban Jehadi Loudspeakers in MosquesIt goes without saying that the Government should impose a strict ban the use of loudspeakers during any religious functions violating the existing laws and making health hazards and utter discomfort by Mosque praer calls (5 times a day on regular basis, made of any other group of Hindus (i.e the bhajan and kirtans) and the use of high volume speakers during marriage functions, sports, mela etc. unreasonably. But the question of loudspeakers in mosques is a bit more persistent as the marriages and bhajan-jagrans don’t happen on daily basis. The unpleasant noise pollution of Mosque is repeatedly questioned as because a mosque blares loudspeaker 5 times every day. Same is not the case with temples or churches. Masjids as well as temples or in fact, anybody (even private bodies) can make any amount of Noise in India. There is no absolute and uniformed legality to ban the noise pollution in India. Different states have their separate regulatory acts and laws and obviously the political indulgence to violate such provisions. The reason why Mosques (or temples or anybody) are allowed such noise pollution is because we have a spineless government which in the name of religious freedom doesn’t even care about our privacy, peace, health, safety and security. And most people too support such decisions because for them anything even remotely religious that has no divine sanction. Really, the time considerations of Azan are very bad. One Muslim young man writes in a internet social forum that, “first lets take the time into consideration…though the loudspeakers do one azaan (call for prayer) for barely 2 or 3 minutes, the timing is quite bad.. the fazr (morning) azaan is at 5 a.m(approximately)…now all of us are not early sleepers…i sleep between 12a.m to 1a.m(force of habit)…and i am forcibly awakened by the sound of azaan at 5 a.m…needless to say it ruins my entire day…now when i try to catch my sleep in the afternoon there is an azaan at 1 p.m, one at 4 p.m, one at 6 and one at 8 p.m (all approximate)…so there goes my afternoon nap…and if u have your exams (as i had my boards) the problem is intensified to a whole new level…besides i have 3 mosques (and one in construction) in a 200m radius around my house so its no longer 3 minutes but an annoying 9 minutes (the azaans rarely overlap)..plus sound from mosques that are a bit farther does manage to trickle in during the wee hours…and i am a young fellow (or so do i consider myself)…so i can only imagine the plight of the sick and the elderly..” Exactly the Azaan from Mosques create problem for all staying in different stages of life and occupation. Is a prayer call through hi-fi sound system or in loud-speakers are too essential from a Mosque? Certainly not as it has no such mandate from any Islamic scriptures nor it has any historical legacy as such. We did not find common use of loud speaker in mosques even after the 100 years of invention of loudspeakers (in 1876). It is 1977-1980, when Indian mosques started hectic using of loud speakers in large scale and certainly not before that. And the numbers of horns in the mosques minarets are gradually increasing day by day. If anyone thinks that the prospective namazis are gradually losing their hearing capability and being deaf or it is case of sustainable hearing loss of Allah himself, so more and more horns are needed, that’s wrong. The loud-speakers of Mosques are really the ready tool of Jihad for spreading the message of it and to provoke the Muslims to start and make war against non Muslims in riot times. Late night noise pollution has become a serious problem across India even though there is a Supreme Court, High Court Ban and central government ban on it. The Calcutta high court on November, 21, 1996 banned the use of loudspeakers at all places of worship, irrespective of religion. A division bench of Justice Bhagabati Prasad Benerjee and Justice A.K. Chakraborty in their ruling stated that as India is a secular state the ban would cover all religions and steps to control noise pollution should cover all religious communities. The ban which minimised noise levels in the city during the durga-pujas and Kalipujas would also cover gurudwaras and Mosques all over West Bengal. On December 25, 1996 in the evening Milad-un-nabi (religious programme) was held in the Masjid campus near Gate No.1, in Dum Dum Airport area of Calcutta when loudspeakers were used. Officials of the State Pollution Control Board arrived there and found that the sound of the mike-system was 85 decibel (65 decibel was the limit prescribed by the Court). The matter was reported to the High Court which issued a contempt of court notice against the Masjid committee for violating its order. On 31-1-1997 the court found them guilty and imposed a penalty of Rs.2500/- to be deposited with the board. To be absolutely fair it should be added that nearly two dozen Durgapuja, Kalipuja and Jagadhatripuja Committee of Calcutta, Howrah, South -24 Parganas and Hooghly districts also were charged with the contempt of court for violating the noise pollution order and fined Rs.1000/- each. Mr. Jyoti Basu, the then Chief Minister of West Bengal, held a meeting with religious leaders of the Muslim, Sikh and Christian communities at writers Buildings in Calcutta on March 6, 1997. Moulana Mohammad Shabbir of Nakhoda Mosque, Moulana Abdul Quyum, Imam of Solana Masjid and Moulana Masudi, member of the State Waqf Board attended. The then Chief Minister informed them of the Calcutta High Court ban order and requested them to abide by it. The imams told Mr. Basu their problems in abiding by his request. While accepting the spirit of the judgement, they said that if they don’t use loudspeakers, the message of Azaan (call to prayer) will not reach the Muslims. If necessary, they would move the Supreme Court against the order, but would not tolerate any interference in Mosque affairs. Though no Muslim forum reached the Supreme Court in this particular case, the then Left Front Govt. ignored the matter in the course of time. On the other hand Govt. imposed more restrictions upon Hindu Puja committees to get loud-speaker permission and even realized fines from many Hindu puja committees for the violation o noise pollution regulatory acts. This discrimination still persists. In 2005, the Supreme court in ‘Re: Noise Pollution – Implementation of the Laws for Restricting Use of Loudspeakers and High Volume Producing Sound Systems’ case held that the right to life included the right to listen or not to listen any noise and no one could take shelter of the Indian constitution’s Art. 19 (1)(a) (freedom of expression) for creating noise. While stressing on the noise pollution created during night, the court defined ‘night’ as an intervening period between 10 pm to 6 am and imposed a complete ban on playing loud music or making any type of noise. [As reported in Reported in AIR 2005 SC 3136 : 2005 AIR SCW 3525 : (2005)6 SCC 109 vide: http://www.elaw.in/noise/noiseinre.htm ] The central government, in 2009, brought a certain amendment in the Central Acts and Rules relating to environmental pollution showing some concern toward the rampant violation of noise pollution laws. Under the central rules prohibiting noise pollution, a penal provision of imprisonment for a period of five years or fine extending upto Rs. one lakh was introduced. The amendment made the offence of noise pollution non-bailable. Recently, the central government while complying with the Supreme court’s directive after a lapse of four years made a provision in central acts prohibiting late night noise pollution by amplifiers, loudspeakers, music system etc. But there is still scant knowledge of such a ban among common people and even the law enforcement machinery of states has miserably failed to implement the provisions of the Central Act as well as the local Noise Control Act. Most of the states are either having no such law or their noise control acts are still running inconsistent with the provisions of the Central Act and therefore noise pollution is still a bailable offence. Surprisingly, there is no enactment in any state of the country to effectively check late night noise pollution despite the 2005 directive of the Supreme court. Although, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and Orissa have a specific legislation on noise pollution but their law is inconsistent with the central act. Where the Madhya Pradesh Control of Music and Noises Act, 1951 does not define as to what type of noise can be prohibited at night, the penalty is imprisonment for just one month and fine not exceeding Rs. 100. Similarly in Bihar and Orissa a penalty provision ranging from Rs. 100 to 250 has been made which makes noise pollution only a petty offence. Though, the Uttar Pradesh Nagar Mahapalika (Prohibition of Noise and Regulation of Loudspeakers) Rules, 1987 has restricted use of loudspeakers from 8 am to 10 pm but the punishment for violation at night is only a meager fine. The Rajasthan Noises Control Act, 1963, though implemented, has left ‘loud noise’ and ‘prohibited noises’ undefined. Also, the law has not been updated in accordance with the latest amendment in the central act. In its 2005 judgment, the Supreme Court took a note of the fact that the law relating to pollution and especially noise pollution was existing merely on statute books in the country. In its judgment imposing a ban on the use of firecrackers and making loud noise at ‘night’, the Supreme Court has held,”The issue of noise pollution in India has not been taken so far with that seriousness as it ought to have been. There is a lack of will on the part of the executive to implement the laws.” THE NOISE POLLUTION (REGULATION AND CONTROL) RULES, 2000 clearly states that “Wheareas the increasing ambient noise levels in public places from various sources, inter-alia, industrial activity, construction activity, generator sets, loud speakers, public address terms, music systems, vehicular horns and other mechanical devices have mysterious effects on human health and the psychological well being of the people; it is considered necessary to regulate and control noise producing and venerating sources with the objective of maintaining the ambient air quality standards in respect of noise.” [vide: http://www.lawsindia.com/Industrial%20Law/K092.htm]. And this rules has clear restrictions in section 5, that, “5. Restrictions on the use of loud speakers/public address system. – (l) A loudspeaker or a public address system shall not be used except after obtaining written permission from the authority. - (2) A loud speaker or a public address system shall not be used at night (between 10.00 p.m. to 6.00 a.m.) except in closed premises for communication within, e.g. auditoria, conference rooms, conference rooms, community halls and banquet halls.” In that case no Mosques have taken any permission from any administrative or police authority to use mosque loud-speakers and the early morning prayer call at fazr violates the restriction of timings. And obviously all the Mosques violates the permissible sound level of 65 dB(A) Leq in day time (6.00 a.m. to 10.00 p.m.) and 55 dB(A) Leq in night time (10.00 p.m. to 6.00 a.m.) in residential areas all along. The Kerala High Court had, in a order in the recent past (Feb, 2013), asked the police to take strict action against the indiscriminate use of loudspeakers for religious purposes. “No religion prescribes performing prayers through amplifiers and the use of microphones and loudspeakers by religious denominations are to be within the limits prescribed under the Environmental Laws and Police Acts,” a division bench comprising Chief Justice Manjula Chelloor and Justice K. Vinod Chandran said in their decision on a public interest litigation (PIL) appeal. There are so many orders by the honorable courts, but it is utter lack of the authority to honor it. So, the loud-speakers used in Mosques can be withdrawn for violating existing rules and regulations in force along with the breech of peace and causing health and occupational hazards in many ways. The violations in any form anywhere other than mosques must be restricted in same and non-discriminatory manner. Government should ban the use of loudspeakers in mosques and other illicit use of it any other religious programmes without delay. Related:: Hindus need to unite for removing hooters from mosques ! – Shiv Sena MLA Rajesh Kshirsagar: HJS Site. Shun loudspeakers at mosques, says theologians’ body: The Hindu. Posted in Attack upon Hindus by Muslims, Breaking India, Check Global Jihad, Conspiracy against Hindus, Hindus under Islamic Aggression, India under Islamic Aggression, Indian Judiciary, Islamic Menace, Jihad in Hindustan, Jihad in India, Say No to Islam, Stop Islamic Menace in India | Tagged: Calcutta High Court, Government should ban loudspeakers in mosques, Hindus need to unite for removing hooters from mosques, Kerala High Court, Noise Pollution from Mosque Loudspeakers, Restrictions on the use of loud speakers, Stop Noise Pollution of Mosque loudspeakers, Supreme Court of India, THE NOISE POLLUTION (REGULATION AND CONTROL) RULES 2000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amar_jkp Posted June 3, 2014 Report Share Posted June 3, 2014 BJP victory emboldens communal elements, demand to ban on loudspeakers and Azan in mosques grows up May 30, 2014 in Home Slider, Indian Muslim | 3 Comments Share on facebookShare on twitterShare on emailShare on pinterest_shareMore Sharing Services4 14101906588_16e712e6d0_oBy Muslim Mirror News, Mumbai: Emboldened by the BJP’s victory in the just concluded general elections, a far right group is demanding ban on loudspeakers in mosques in Thane district of Maharashtra. Hindu Janjagruti Samiti (HJS) organized a protest for this purpose. They prepared many big hoardings calling Hindus to unite for the cause of banning loudspeakers in mosques and asking them to gather outside Thane (W) railway station on Saturday. During the program they also obtained signatures from the attendees below a memorandum which they later on served to the district police official. The program was attended not only by the HJS members but also by the leaders and members of VHP and Bajrang Dal units of Thane who uninterruptedly provoked people against the religious rituals of Muslims. Ajay Sambhavat, spokesperson of HJS incited the feelings of Hindus by saying that why were they not allowed running loudspeakers after10 pm during Ganesh Chatrvarti and Navratri festivals while Muslims are allowed its use in their daily morning prayer. In neighboring state Karnataka also a little known Hindtuva outfit raised the ante against “azan, saying it should be banned across the country. Rashtriya Hindu Andolan in the coastal city of the state Mangalore has held a protest demonstration in front of the Deputy Commissioner office. Activists of the Sangh Parivar’s other affiliates also gathered at the spot and raised provocative slogans against the minority community. The day when election results were declared, a group of inebriated BJP hooligans attacked two Mosques in separate places of the adjoining South Kannda district. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amandeep Hindustani Posted June 3, 2014 Report Share Posted June 3, 2014 The demand for the ban on loudspeakers is from a fringe group, and does not necessarily mean most of hindu society is fighting for it. These are small things that Modi needs to stay away from. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amandeep Hindustani Posted June 3, 2014 Report Share Posted June 3, 2014 Just watched some news on a guy in the United States who abducted, raped, 2-3 girls for at least 15 years. the poor girls were abducted when young but were kept in his basement in a dungeon. Raped, forced abortions, beatings, threats. And that news is coming from the most civilized industrialized nation in the world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amandeep Hindustani Posted June 3, 2014 Report Share Posted June 3, 2014 Law and order situation in India is very Bad . Indian capital Delhi has become rape capital of world . Police is corrupt and biased. . Conflict between Hindus and Muslims are increasing day by day . Indian Muslims will destroy Hindusthan from within . Ask your muslim brothers to try it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chatanga1 Posted June 3, 2014 Report Share Posted June 3, 2014 come out of time warp you live in and also want to force others to live in. i remind you once again, we are living in 2014 and not 1723. you cannot move forward looking in the rear view mirrors all the time. yes we are living in 2014, where justice and equality are major concerns of the peoples and countries of this world. lets move forward to honour justice, especially t those who have been denied justice since 1947 in india. Let's move together. I dont want anyone to represent news for anyone but it is much better if the Indians (Sikhs inc) get the news from the Indian media which is much more transparent than the BS we get from the khali websites and television channels and radio stations. you make a good case for the opposite. what makes the indian news any truer for the Sikhs than the sikhs news for the hindus? yes Afghanistan is much more stable and fair than under your poster boy talibans. stable? fairer? go ask the people there, who even though they hated the taliban, at least respected them for the security and stability they bought after 2 decades of war. has the corruption there increased or decreased since the taliban? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonyhp32 Posted June 4, 2014 Report Share Posted June 4, 2014 Just watched some news on a guy in the United States who abducted, raped, 2-3 girls for at least 15 years. the poor girls were abducted when young but were kept in his basement in a dungeon. Raped, forced abortions, beatings, threats. And that news is coming from the most civilized industrialized nation in the world. What a dumb comparison. The guy who kept these girls a prisoner did so in secret, trying to avoid getting caught. The Hindustanis who did this did what they did in the open without any fear of the consequences. It shows the animal mentality of the Hindustanis. It is only because this news in now getting an airing that there has been any action otherwise atrocities like these happen most everyday in India. As for your scenario of the world and his wife coming to India's aid in a war you are deluded as the leadership in India is. What did the world do in 1962 apart from making a few noises and giving India their outdated and surplus equipment the West did nothing. India nuke Bangladesh? They couldn't even retaliate when their troops were mutilated by the Bangladeshis and you think they have the balls to nuke Bangladesh! Well, name one community which has not faced injustice in india . There are flaws in the Indian democracy, there are inequalities but one who has faced injustice at some stage may also be the perpetrator today. That said, india is still is the best bet in the region where you have dictatorships like China, Burma; brute theocracies (or quasi theocracies) like Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan; deeply flawed democracies like baangladesh and Nepal. Indian democracy on the other hand is lauded almost everyday as in a number of ways it has set new precedents for democracies which you may consider your ideal (the US, France, UK, etc). Anyway, who has faced injustice since 1947. Please give specific examples of injustice and not rhetoric copy-pasted from unbelievably rotten khali websites. So basically India is a country where everyone faces injustice. As the main reason for the existence of a government is to provide security, peace, justice and economic well being of the people and according to you it has failed to provide justice then why should it exist at all. Indian democracy on the other hand is lauded almost everyday as in a number of ways it has set new precedents for democracies which you may consider your ideal (the US, France, UK, etc). As for the lauding Indian 'democracy', I am assuming this is based on newsreports that some western body has been congratulating India about how it ran the elections, they are doing so because of their racist attitude through which they have a low expectation of non-whites. Precedents? So you think that opening giving out alcohol and drugs, capturing polling booths, threats of violence and actual violence are precedents for the west? You truly are a joker! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amandeep Hindustani Posted June 4, 2014 Report Share Posted June 4, 2014 What a dumb comparison. The guy who kept these girls a prisoner did so in secret, trying to avoid getting caught. The Hindustanis who did this did what they did in the open without any fear of the consequences. It shows the animal mentality of the Hindustanis. It is only because this news in now getting an airing that there has been any action otherwise atrocities like these happen most everyday in India. As for your scenario of the world and his wife coming to India's aid in a war you are deluded as the leadership in India is. What did the world do in 1962 apart from making a few noises and giving India their outdated and surplus equipment the West did nothing. India nuke Bangladesh? They couldn't even retaliate when their troops were mutilated by the Bangladeshis and you think they have the balls to nuke Bangladesh! So basically India is a country where everyone faces injustice. As the main reason for the existence of a government is to provide security, peace, justice and economic well being of the people and according to you it has failed to provide justice then why should it exist at all. As for the lauding Indian 'democracy', I am assuming this is based on newsreports that some western body has been congratulating India about how it ran the elections, they are doing so because of their racist attitude through which they have a low expectation of non-whites. Precedents? So you think that opening giving out alcohol and drugs, capturing polling booths, threats of violence and actual violence are precedents for the west? You truly are a joker! I guess you had trouble reading my hypothetical situation situation in response to another hypothetical situation. And your comments are coming from a guy who's country accepts baksheesh from the United States that allows them to bomb your civilians repeatedly, or your comments are from a guy who's community is quite famous even the west for stabbing each other with kirpans during elections in your religious institutions. As for the Indian election, it has been largely peaceful. Stray incidents of violence do not necessarily mean the entire process is bad. The Election Commission of India did a fantastic job based on the circumstances. The West understand the constraints, situation and size of the election hence the congratulatory notes. The situation with Bangladesh was minor. But when the much stronger pakjabis pushed the line they got a mouthful. As Nawaz Shariff admits thousands of Pakistani soldiers were killed by the IA - entire regiments wiped out. Crimes in the open happen in the United States and the rest of the world as well. Take a gander below. Now, youtube may be against islam and users may get hellfire, wrath of Allah but I urge to take a look anyways. The year is 2011. A group of white teens decide to run over every black person they see on the road. Pretty open and without fear of the consequences. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amandeep Hindustani Posted June 4, 2014 Report Share Posted June 4, 2014 (edited) Here is pakjabis surrendering en masse in 71 live and in colour. It starts at 1:44 and you seem them bowing and laying down their weapons. Here are your pakjabis surrendering again in 1999 with white flag. And here are pakjabis, captured in war, crying because they want to go home. "Sahib, I'm from lahore and I have 6 biwis and 40 children, sahib" I would like your comments unless you are going evade, ignore as usual. Tx Edited June 4, 2014 by Amandeep Hindustani Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chatanga1 Posted June 4, 2014 Report Share Posted June 4, 2014 There are flaws in the Indian democracy, there are inequalities but one who has faced injustice at some stage may also be the perpetrator today. That said, india is still is the best bet in the region where you have dictatorships like China, Burma; brute theocracies (or quasi theocracies) like Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan; deeply flawed democracies like baangladesh and Nepal. honour in being the best turd in the pile? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amandeep Hindustani Posted June 4, 2014 Report Share Posted June 4, 2014 Indians are bad, the western countries are racist and how you would define yourself. which would be the ideal country for you to live in the region and on other continents too? capturing polling booths, threats of violence...are you talking about the Paki elections? BTW, your compatriot pakis are also in awe of the way elections are conducted in India and want the same pattern, same transparency to be adopted in their wretched country too. Koi shaq? The paki was impressed by the indian election but depressed by the way Modi treated Nawaz Shariff like a "schoolboy" - not my words. Please read Imran Khans latest statement. I wonder what Tony Sahib has to say about the alleged vote rigging during George Bush Jrs time, corruption, backroom deals, infighting no less vicious then in India. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnPathToSikhi Posted June 4, 2014 Report Share Posted June 4, 2014 (edited) Well, it's up to you whichever way you interpret is. if you have no respect for the democratic values, you would look at this scenario as the 'worst turd' in the pile. Respect? Democratic values? Clown, do you even understand the meaning of these words. Coming from a rat who glorifies Indira Gandhi. Edited June 4, 2014 by OnPathToSikhi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amandeep Hindustani Posted June 5, 2014 Report Share Posted June 5, 2014 Respect? Democratic values? Clown, do you even understand the meaning of these words. Coming from a rat who glorifies Indira Gandhi. We consider Indira Gandhi, a politician with multiple faults which has been discussed again and again over the years. But we don't put up pictures of her in our temples, sing songs about her, or hold melas in her honour like some-people do in relation to a certain "Sant" And what democratic values are you talking about? You wanted to overthrow a largely democratic state to set up a theocratic state. And now you are trying to use the democratic process in India and abroad to set up your magical kingdom in which everybody is equal, no violence, crime, unhappiness, lots of food, equal say and deer eat from your hand as you walk the street. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amandeep Hindustani Posted June 5, 2014 Report Share Posted June 5, 2014 Modi cracks the whip, SAD goes running. http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/punjabs-drug-crackdown/ Having suffered election setbacks that have been linked to the drug problem in Punjab, a major issue during the polls, the ruling SAD-BJP has launched a crackdown. A special police drive, started immediately after the election results, has led to the arrest of 3,353 persons in just 15 days and registration of 3,000 cases against them. The government has also dismissed 25 station house officers from the police for suspected links with drug racketeers. “We are working on identifying the black sheep within the police who are involved with drug smugglers. No one will be spared,” said Deputy Chief Minister Sukhbir Singh Badal. The names of those dismissed haven’t been made public yet. Sources in the deputy CM’s office hinted more are in the firing line. Outside the force, the target of the crackdown has been street operators and peddlers who deal in small quantities. Not much has been seized but police say the crackdown is essential to wipe the supply chain out. “The supply of heroin is almost finished in Punjab. White powder is not available in the market either,” said a top officer. The government is hoping the break in supply will bring drug addicts to de-addiction centres. Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal on Tuesday reviewed the de-addiction facilities available and was reportedly told by health authorities that there is enough room. The opposition has called the drive “thoughtless” with small operators picked up at random. Sukhbir, who also handles Home, said, “The solution lies not only in picking up peddlers and filling jails. The problem is multifaceted and requires a solution at several levels.” He has asked three IGs to prepare a comprehensive plan at various levels. “The next step will be taken only once when their report is with us next week,” Sukhbir said. Sukhbir, also the SAD president, saw the party’s vote share drop 12 lakh in an election centred around the easy availability of drugs and the alleged links of politicians to these rackets. The opposition had targeted Sukhbir’s brother-in-law Bikram Singh Majithia for alleged links to drug smugglers, and the SAD spent much of its campaign defending him. to help us personalise your reading experience. Majithia was named by international racketeer Jagdish Bhola in a statement to the enforcement directorate. Though Bhola was arrested by the Punjab police, the ED got into the case to investigate hawala transactions. Bhola also named Damanvir Singh, son of then jails minister Sarwan Singh Phillaur, as being involved in the racket. Just after the election results, the CM removed Phillaur. During the two months the election code of conduct was in effect, Election Commission teams and the Punjab police recovered more drugs than from any other state. From March 5 to May 1, the police recovered drugs worth Rs 780 crore while the EC’s static surveillance teams recovered 426 kg drugs worth Rs 1.90 crore and its flying squads 767 kg worth Rs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonyhp32 Posted June 5, 2014 Report Share Posted June 5, 2014 The paki was impressed by the indian election but depressed by the way Modi treated Nawaz Shariff like a "schoolboy" - not my words. Please read Imran Khans latest statement. I wonder what Tony Sahib has to say about the alleged vote rigging during George Bush Jrs time, corruption, backroom deals, infighting no less vicious then in India. Imran Khan's belongs to a rival political party so it is in his interest to portray Sharif as a weakling before a gujju who the whole world not just South Asia knows are a weak race. It is in Khan's interest to do down his own country's establishment to gain support for his own party. Only a dumb Hindustani with low self esteem whose needs his ego to be massaged by reading such news reports about how great his country is without knowing the motive of the person making the statements. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonyhp32 Posted June 5, 2014 Report Share Posted June 5, 2014 Modi cracks the whip, SAD goes running. http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/punjabs-drug-crackdown/ Having suffered election setbacks that have been linked to the drug problem in Punjab, a major issue during the polls, the ruling SAD-BJP has launched a crackdown. A special police drive, started immediately after the election results, has led to the arrest of 3,353 persons in just 15 days and registration of 3,000 cases against them. The government has also dismissed 25 station house officers from the police for suspected links with drug racketeers. “We are working on identifying the black sheep within the police who are involved with drug smugglers. No one will be spared,” said Deputy Chief Minister Sukhbir Singh Badal. The names of those dismissed haven’t been made public yet. Sources in the deputy CM’s office hinted more are in the firing line. Outside the force, the target of the crackdown has been street operators and peddlers who deal in small quantities. Not much has been seized but police say the crackdown is essential to wipe the supply chain out. “The supply of heroin is almost finished in Punjab. White powder is not available in the market either,” said a top officer. The government is hoping the break in supply will bring drug addicts to de-addiction centres. Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal on Tuesday reviewed the de-addiction facilities available and was reportedly told by health authorities that there is enough room. The opposition has called the drive “thoughtless” with small operators picked up at random. Sukhbir, who also handles Home, said, “The solution lies not only in picking up peddlers and filling jails. The problem is multifaceted and requires a solution at several levels.” He has asked three IGs to prepare a comprehensive plan at various levels. “The next step will be taken only once when their report is with us next week,” Sukhbir said. Sukhbir, also the SAD president, saw the party’s vote share drop 12 lakh in an election centred around the easy availability of drugs and the alleged links of politicians to these rackets. The opposition had targeted Sukhbir’s brother-in-law Bikram Singh Majithia for alleged links to drug smugglers, and the SAD spent much of its campaign defending him. to help us personalise your reading experience. Majithia was named by international racketeer Jagdish Bhola in a statement to the enforcement directorate. Though Bhola was arrested by the Punjab police, the ED got into the case to investigate hawala transactions. Bhola also named Damanvir Singh, son of then jails minister Sarwan Singh Phillaur, as being involved in the racket. Just after the election results, the CM removed Phillaur. During the two months the election code of conduct was in effect, Election Commission teams and the Punjab police recovered more drugs than from any other state. From March 5 to May 1, the police recovered drugs worth Rs 780 crore while the EC’s static surveillance teams recovered 426 kg drugs worth Rs 1.90 crore and its flying squads 767 kg worth Rs You dumb Hindustani. Where does it say that Modi is behind this drive? Badal has wet his pants because of the loss of Panthic votes to AAP and that is the reason that they have started the anti-drugs drive and not because of the gujju in delhi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonyhp32 Posted June 5, 2014 Report Share Posted June 5, 2014 Indians are bad, the western countries are racist and how you would define yourself. which would be the ideal country for you to live in the region and on other continents too? capturing polling booths, threats of violence...are you talking about the Paki elections? BTW, your compatriot pakis are also in awe of the way elections are conducted in India and want the same pattern, same transparency to be adopted in their wretched country too. Koi shaq? The west is not as racist as India which is one of the most racist countries in the world, that's one 'India is number 1' claim you can rightly make. The west has a low expectation from the Hindustanis and knows how to massage their ego. Hence the praise they heap on worthless idiots like Manmohan Singh and now they will do the same to Modi. What the west wants is your money, at the moment they are happy to invest their money which they get from the government at virtually zero percent interest and which then causes a property bubble and high inflation in India. The poor can only survive in India due to subsidies from the government. Wait until the interest rates in the west go up and they pull their money out and the Indian economy collapses. My compatriots? I'm not a Pakistani dumb ass, unlike you and the other Desh Bigots, I don't pretend to be something I am not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amar_jkp Posted June 5, 2014 Report Share Posted June 5, 2014 Britain is one of the most racially tolerant countries on the planet, a survey claims. The global social attitudes study claims that the most racially intolerant populations are all in the developing world, with Jordan and India in the top five. By contrast, the study of 80 countries over three decades found Western countries were most accepting of other cultures with Britain, the U.S., Canada and Australia more tolerant than anywhere else. Enlarge Racism: This map shows the nations of the world where people have the most and least tolerant attitudes Racism: This map shows the nations of the world where people have the most and least tolerant attitudes The data came from the World Value Survey, which measured the social attitudes of people in different countries, as reported by the Washington Post. The survey asked individuals what types of people they would refuse to live next to, and counted how many chose the option 'people of a different race' as a percentage for each country. Researchers have suggested that societies where more people do not want neighbours from other races can be considered less racially tolerant. More... Which is the world's most mobile country? Migration map reveals the populations with itchy feet Finally recognised after 400 years: New York's very first immigrant honoured with three-mile stretch of Broadway named after him The country with the highest proportion of 'intolerant' people who wanted neighbours similar to them was Jordan, where 51.4 per cent of the population would refuse to live next to someone of a different race. Next was India with 43.5 per cent. Racist views are strikingly rare in the U.S., according to the survey, which claims that only 3.8 per cent of residents are reluctant to have a neighbour of another race. Diverse: The multicultural U.S. is among the least racially intolerant countries, according to the data +1 Diverse: The multicultural U.S. is among the least racially intolerant countries, according to the data Other English-speaking countries once part of the British Empire shared the same tolerant attitude - fewer than five per cent of Britons, Canadians, Australians and New Zealanders showed signs of racism. People in the UK are also tolerant of other differences such as speaking a foreign language or practising an alternative religion - for example, fewer than two per cent of Britons would object to having neighbours of a different faith to them. Similarly, fewer than one in 20 people in most South American countries admitted harbouring prejudice against other races. The Middle East, which is currently dealing with large numbers of low-skilled immigrants from south Asia, seems to be a hotbed of racial tension, however. Europe is remarkably split - the west of the continent is generally more tolerant than the east, but France is a striking outlier with 22.7 per cent of the French rejecting neighbourhood diversity. Some have pointed out problems in the survey data, claiming that because the polls span a long period of time they are an unreliable guide to current attitudes. However, a more serious flaw could be the fact that in most Western countries racism is so taboo than many people will hide their intolerant views and lie to the questioners. Max Fisher of the Washington Post suggested that maybe 'Americans are conditioned by their education and media to keep these sorts of racial preferences private, i.e. to lie about them on surveys, in a way that Indians might not be'. THE LEAST RACIALLY TOLERANT COUNTRIES 40% + (of individuals surveyed would not want a person of another race as a neighbour) India, Jordan 30 - 39.9% Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Vietnam, Indonesia, South Korea 20 - 39.9% France, Turkey, Bulgaria, Algeria, Morocco, Mali, Zambia, Thailand, Malaysia, The Philippines, Bangladesh, Hong Kong THE MOST TOLERANT COUNTRIES 0 to 4.9% United States, Canada, Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, Guatemala, Britain, Sweden, Norway, Latvia, Australia, New Zealand 5 - 9.9% Chile, Peru, Mexico, Spain, Germany, Belgium, Belarus, Croatia, Japan, Pakistan, South Africa 10 - 14.9% Finland, Poland, Ukraine, Italy, Greece, Czech Republic, Slovakia 15 - 19.9% Venezuela, Hungary, Serbia, Romania, Macedonia, Ethiopia, Uganda, Tanzania, Zimbabwe, Russia, China Source: World Values Survey An earlier version of this article incorrectly stated that Hong Kong and Bangladesh were two of the world's least racially tolerant countries. We are happy to clarify this is not the case. Read more: Washington Post: A fascinating map of the world's most and least racially tolerant countries Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2325502/Map-shows-worlds-racist-countries-answers-surprise-you.html#ixzz33kHa0eve Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chatanga1 Posted June 5, 2014 Report Share Posted June 5, 2014 Well, it's up to you whichever way you interpret is. if you have no respect for the democratic values, you would look at this scenario as the 'worst turd' in the pile. I have interpreted it exactly the way it is. no point in having a "democracy" and pretending to have "respect" for "democratic values" when you practice torture and murder your own civilians (the ones who's votes you needed to rule ironically), are corrupt to the bone. And then have the gall to attack others who want to have their basic human rights. So, it's a pretty fair conclusion, that india may have 1 thing better about it than other hell-holes, but it's still a turd amongst other turds. There's no honour in that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 5, 2014 Report Share Posted June 5, 2014 On that note, topic closed as enough is said on this topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts