singho

Watch:

Jah is THE Ras Tafari, for that is His name. His followers are called Rastafarians after him (although they're really Garveyites). And who say Jah no dread??

Mohinder Dhillon. It would have been a characteristically generous gesture. I don't know whether it's true though. I think I've seen a photograph of them shaking hands. ...

OK thanks for that Maha Singh. Thuggee business LOL On the dhara front, I saw a Billy Connolly show once when he said that in his many pub fights, his opponent would usually try to punch him out on the chin but miss, because of his long beard (they were fooled by his beard into thinking his jaw was a lot more protruding than it was).

What about using the dhumalla as a weapon, to strangle the opponent? Is this allowed?

The prejudice against Muslims and Hindus by Jatt Sikh supremacists whose one and only motive is the acquisition of land is indefensible, and even worse when attempts are made to enshrine it in 'religion' such as by this alleged 'tradition' and by many more recent ones. Only the most vile, base, ignoble people would seek to defend or justify such.

What does 'tills' mean?

Chavistani culture, not black culture

You guys are publicly insulting a real person, who has made no claims to being a Sikh and who is not a member of your cozy little self-reassuring circle and who probably doesn't care what you think of her.

Or perhaps it's simply that I'm more well-read than you are Matheen..

He was misguided if he thought that. Sikander retarded the cause of civilisation, and has been residing in hell since his death.

Ahhhh, cute...

Do you mean this one? http://www.tapoban.org/phorum/list.php?f=1 :roll:

Number 52 with oyster sauce and cashew nuts for me, please.

It seems a compelling argument when you put it like that, but I wonder whether according to the prevailing and entrenched idea of the importance of biological paternity in Indic culture (even more so in the 17th century), the use of the word 'father' in reference to Guruji is entirely appropriate. I wonder when this 'convention' came about, and who was responsible for it. Is it possible, that the practice might even have caused sectarian violence at various times in the past (as suggested by Rajinder Nijjhar)?

This is an important point. I am not aware of any evidence that Guru Gobind Singh ever called himself or considered himself the 'father' of his Sikhs.

That is an incredibly stupid assertion. Perhaps the author is unaware of an 'obscure' Sikh canon called 'Sri Guru Granth Sahib' or 'Adi Granth'?

No there's more to it than that. This is another gross over-simplification. Furthermore which Persian religion? Actually don't answer that because we've got Google too.

I think the bird is the viewer, who looks to Guru. Guru himself looks beyond the bird.

http://www.sikhawareness.com/sikhawareness...heyear2_929.pdf :roll:

The reason I said it was to cause mild annoyance because I don't like you personally. Not to cause serious offense or any real problems for anyone, but sufficient to make my feelings known. I hardly think that calling you an idiot is an expression of krodh and frustrations. If I felt that way I would take your comments about this mystery person who you say " can't make up his mind which faith and sect to follow" to some interested parties. As it is, you're not worth the trouble so carry on doing what you do best: free PR work and cutting and pasting from other sites. Weirdo.

Are you calling me out? From the musician who doesn't know what timbre is, to the foul-mouthed tarkhan slob, you guys are real idiots.

Please join the regiment ASAP! They need you.