chatanga1

Brothers, firstly an apology to all for contributing here sporadically. I have been in Panjab for all of August and had a lot of work to do when I got back. Gurprasad, I acheived my minds life-long desires by visiting the houses of my Guru, for which I yearned to see for years. Now I am at peace concerning those. 
Whilst i was in Panjab, I had some time to do some reading and I purchased another copy of 1001 nights. In this edition I found so many similarities in the stories of 1001 nights that also featured in Sri Charitropakhyan Granth.
I am going to share some of those soon. The first one I want to share is the story of when the woman hid a man in a trunk in her home and told her husband that there was a man hidden in there. Then as the man went to check, the woman raised her arms to her head and questioned her husbands trust of her.

Rang Raae falls in love with a man, who is described in the Charitar as having no beard and moustache, which possibly alludes to a young man.
Maybe the wise minster is trying tell Chitar Singh that Chitar Mati desires a young man, who can sexually satisfy her and she has tried to cheat on you.
 
Bhul chuk maaf

Maybe the wise minster is trying to tell the king that as the thief was weak, so are you.
This can be interpreted in two possible ways:
Physically weak to sexually satisfy Chitar Mati, which resulted in her move towards the younger Hanwant Singh Intellectually weak to be able to understand what Chitar Mati is doing.  
Bhul chuk maaf

In this Charitar, Maharaaj has also given a tip to his Sikhs, in case of a combat. Knowing the weaknesses of an opponent can really help an individual in a physical combat. Kandhal did not have a weapon, while Chanbha had one, but still the former was able to able to save his life. Kandhal was smart and acted swiftly by throwing sand into the only functional eye of Chanbha, which gave him ample time to flee the scene.
IMHO, it is very important to know the weaknesses of your enemies/opponents. Always be aware of people's weaknesses around you. Obviously, don't use it exploit good people, but you never know when a particular piece of information might get you out of a tough situation.
 
Bhul chuk maaf

Bhagat Singh Ji, do you know there is a place in Gurdaspur called "Qadian" which is pronounced just as it is written in Gurmukhi. Even the Muslims pronounce it this way with a "d."
 
I do not believe that what you have written is correct, and have never heard any paath with it said as such.
 
In Arabic there are 4 ways to pronounce "z", even though in Persian there is only 1. It may be that a different pronunciation of the arabic "z" resulted in it becoming a "d" but that is exactly what it is.  

Must have been some other person then who looked and dressed exactly like your coward cult leader. 
 
 

I don't think he is going to answer you. The only healthy debate angy seems to be having at the moment is with himself. It's a shame cos I really wanted to discuss some of the things ghaghri has been saying recently.
I rarely ask admins to consider banning anyone. I have no problems with those posters who are here to debate and discuss properly even if our views are diametrical. But to see this topic ruined by posts which are going nowhere makes me feel that the admins @sarabatam @amardeep @Xylitol should should either the ask the cult followers to discuss things properly or remove them from the discussion forum.

Where and when we’re innocent Hindus killed by kharkhus?
 
do you want examples of innocent Sikhs killed by legitimate weapons of democratic India? I have plenty. I’m sure you have none.

How do you know hitler was innocent?

I listen to Giani Ran Singh regularly but above video is also excellent.
 
http://www.gurmatveechar.com/audios/Gurbani_Ucharan/Nihang_Giani_Ran_Singh_(Taruna_Dal)/Nihang.Giani.Ran.Singh.(Taruna.Dal)--Jap.Ji.Sahib.mp3

Amounts? I see more, millions more at mecca and at ganga, haridwar. So why are you siding with the thousands? Go to mecca or Haridwar and join the millions.

You don't really sound like you are sorry.
 
Democracy is just power for the majority. Wasn't Hitler voted in on a majority democratic vote?
 
Ok, so what about those possessing LEGAL arms ie police, army etc and killing innocent people? Is that ok ?
 
Ok. What about those who possessed legal arms and killed thousands of people in India. What are they known as ?
 
Well you can't fault the Sikhs for trying that, unless you are ignorant of Sikh history from 1947. The Sikhs did try and made many sacrifices. But they didn't win. Why?
 
I'm not sure what constitutional means would have been effective when someone in possession of a LEGAL gun is able to kill a person and be protected by the state. But I'm sure you do.

Come on! It's akalpurkh. You know "anek hai, phir ek hai..."

Thats what he claimed but it was obvious right from the get-go that he wasn't here for that. I had to ask him a question 12 times before he would answer it and even then it was jsut a product of his poisonous mind.

Amounts? I see more, millions more at mecca and at ganga, haridwar. So why are you siding with the thousands? Go to mecca or Haridwar and join the millions.

I don't think that a coward who soiled his knickers in a fight will drag anyone anywhere.
I can easily refute any of the cowards assertions here. But you fanboys who think brahmanism is a virus will never understand.

Because he is a typical missionary fanboy. Refuses t answer any questions and asks repetitive irrelevant questions.
And he thought brahmanism was a virus.

@BhagatSingh Listen to this recording, it is pretty shudh IMO. You will get a better idea of siharis, aunkars etc
 
 
 

So you agree that you are repeating a question?
Is repeating questions, for which answers have been provided, a sign of a healthy debate?
Didn't you want the forum open to healthy debates and opinion?
 
Bhul chuk maaf

The Panth did, in recognition of his gyan.

You are a cultist. You follow ghaggri no matter what he says . Even when he speaks against gurmat principles you have no shame in defending him.

The Panth did, in recognition of his gyan.

You are a cultist. You follow ghaggri no matter what he says . Even when he speaks against gurmat principles you have no shame in defending him.

There is no chaos in Gurdwaras. The only chaos is in your mind because we refuse to join your ghagri cult.
 
 

The Panth did, in recognition of his gyan.