Dharma

dalsingh I will also miss your posts on here and Sikh Sangat if you leave. You are the best poster around. You should definitely reconsider.

dalsingh I will also miss your posts on here and Sikh Sangat if you leave. You are the best poster around. You should definitely reconsider.

@dalsingh101veer ji please don't leave this site won't be the same without you.

You are NOT allowed to leave bro. Get your ass back here.
 
Bhul chuk maaf

Facts

dalsingh I will also miss your posts on here and Sikh Sangat if you leave. You are the best poster around. You should definitely reconsider.

dalsingh I will also miss your posts on here and Sikh Sangat if you leave. You are the best poster around. You should definitely reconsider.

You're right, and it's not only Asians who notice this.

Here are some interesting comments by a black guy on another forum (username "K R"):

Its England, they've never hated anyone more than an asian.

and:

I always assumed it was a religious and cultural thing. On that front the white community is much more comfortable with the black as many black people are christian and raised under western values and culture - so on a basic level they get them more. Interesting thing is the hate seems to transcend even the ignorance and cultural under-exposure of working class whites into the more knowledgeable middle-class whites. A good amount of my friends are white middle class and the subtle, 'humouring' racism against the desi community is profound.

Also white and black people in Britain mix relationship wise about 10x more so I just think there's a kind of indifference there.

http://forums.ratedesi.com/showthread.php?t=287788

This guys friends sound like the closet racists you speak about. I wouldn't be surprised if they try to cultivate hostility in blacks towards Asians.



I think the same. A while ago I read about a half-Sikh / half-white guy who joined the army who was continually verbally and physically attacked by a racist corporal and ended up with his eyeball hanging out after one attack. But this kind of thing is predictable. Sikhs should do as Hindus and Chinese do and focus on good education and employment.

Sikh talks about being subjected to racism by white Brits even though he fought for Britain during WW2. It's interesting to hear what he has to say.

https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/punjab/sikh-leaders-shiv-sena-come-face-to-face-during-protest-against-aamir-khans-film-laal-singh-chaddha-in-jalandhar-421059
 
So now Sikhs are new foot soldiers of Amir Khan and Bollywood. He is portraying a low IQ Sikh character and Sikhs are going Gaga over it

It's hard to say for certain who started it but as people say it is usually goray who start these things. Maybe I could understand a sullah starting it (though even that is relatively rare - they just fight back more) but not a Sikh. Plus if the Sikhs did hold a negative stereotype of whites one has to wonder what caused it.

Actually this reminds me of a case in the UK which involved multiple sullay who were tried and convicted of attacking a white boy with a hammer outside his school. The school was majority white/minority Asian. I immediately wondered whether the victim had done something to provoke it. It was claimed to be a race attack but one has to wonder why a bunch of 18-20 year olds would attack a 15 year old outside his school in front of 100 witnesses instead of picking a target in a back alley on a dark night if that was their motive.

Initially the picture painted was that a gang of sullay kids at the school were bullying whites. This was substantiated by children, parents and teaching staff, who were all white. The prosecutor said that the sullay singled out the victim because of his distinctive appearance.

The victim of the attack was 15 year old 6ft 2in rugby player of stocky build. He had 'agreed' to have a 'fair' one-on-one fight with a 14 year old sullah boy described as "diminutive". The sullah then phoned the defendants for backup.

The defendants reckoned the rugby player was a bully. One said that he had previously approached the headmaster twice about the bullying of a young Muslim pupil by him, but was told that there was no racism at the school. Another said that their aim was to make a show of strength to "deter the bullies".

After the trial a the rugby player's family (who blamed "multiculturalism" for the whole mess) sued the school for damages. Here the head told the court that all race tensions stemmed from white antagonism towards Asian pupils. He said some Asians did congregate in a group of 10-15, but it was not a problem as far as he could see. He said they were pleasant to him and pointed out that white children formed groups as well. I wonder why none of the trial witnesses said any of this?

Hope you don't think this is off topic, I think it has some relevance in terms of racism and people collectively lying about stuff and feigning innocence.

The guy definitely deserved a jhapad for disrespecting the pagh. Actually I was surprised the Canadian judge considered childhood trauma a mitigating factor. I couldn't see that happening here.

I have also noticed the gora trait of frothing at the mouth over games of football. It isn't just chavs, the entire crowd is belligerent. Even BMEs into the game don't have the same demeanour. Sports spectator crowds in places like China and India are way more layed back. I think football mimics tribal warfare more so than other competitive sports and this is why they go ape over it. It's their extreme warlike nature.


I've noticed this as well. Another thing is a phobia about ethnics speaking their native tongue. I've heard this complaint many times. I asked one guy what the big deal was and he said they will be badmouthing whites on the sly! I doubt he was unique in this belief. It is total nonsense of course, but it is exactly what many of them do so they assume that everyone else does the same.

I bet the employment lawyer you mention sees only the tip of the iceberg. Most victims won't even bother complaining since they can't prove it and they will only be accused of being race card-playing compensation-scrounging uppity troublemakers. My general observation is that a lot of racism is done using malicious complaints, disiplinary proceeedings, internal investigation, passive-aggressive hostility, etc rather than cross burning type stuff. These kinds of tactics are a recurrent theme in the police.

Hindus simultaneously deny and have no remorse for the continual genocide of Sikhs. Zero. And when you expose them in rooms full of people they flee. But only after doing their pathetic best to label all Sikhs terrorists.

Sorry I've decided to edit this post because it was so messy. Don't worry the points are basically the same.

dalsingh is right, the progress on race relations is fragile. Whites could easily become more rightwing just as Muslims have in recent years. A lot of racism these days is done slyly in a passive-aggressive way and victims usually tolerate it because they cannot prove it. Race laws and political correctness have pushed it underground. Inquiries usually find that non-whites are given a harder time than whites in various UK institutions. This is why I am wary about contributing to this anti-sullah thing.

Goray aren't always as nice and moral as they seem to be. I remember reading a post by a guy a while back by a guy who worked at a UK university. He wrote about how there was a really nasty white female student there who with her friends continually baited an Asian Muslim student (whom he did not describe negatively, so he was most likely harmless). She took it so far that the guy eventually flipped and she ended up locked in a room with him and a butcher's knife. The Police ended up involved. He was arrested and removed (understandably) while she got sympathy from everyone. And she is still carrying on in the same manner with other victims. It's just something I have noticed more than once. Goray can be very admiring of nasty bullying people.

There seems to be more negative feeling towards Asians in the UK than other groups. I've noticed some white people not say bad things about blacks being receptive to negative stereotypes about Asians that depict us as greedy, evil, dirty, dishonest and scheming, etc. Remember how Shilpa was treated on Big Brother. They were OK with Jermaine Jackson. The Secret Policeman documentary also revealed a fixation with Asians, and it wasn't just the bigmouths who were like that. The training instructor and the rest of the trainees showed the same attitude, only they had the sense to not flaunt it at every opportunity, but it was clear when it was announced that the Asian trainee was backtracked. What led to the Oldham riots showed the same. It wasn't just the BNP, there was collusion by police and the local press. Local chavs boasted on TV about how the area is a no-go area for non-whites and promised a race war specifically mentioning Asians.

Darby's comment is useful to show any Sikhs who actually believe the BNP bukwas about "we're only against sullay".

There is a novel written by a white nationalist called The Turner Diaries. It is about of a revolutionary race war in America. The BNP think the same way, they're just tactful about it. A while back Griffin mentioned that the economic downturn and decline of global oil reserves would trigger upheaval and change. He sees the anti-sullah climate as another window of opportunity. The BNP policy of giving all British people a rifle must be seen in the same light.