Jump to content

Kuttabanda2

Members
  • Posts

    269
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    Kuttabanda2 got a reaction from Koi in What You Like /dislike About Our Community?   
    From my experiences and observations both on a macro and micro level, I've seen a lot of faults within the community along with virtues.

    These are the faults that I find most notable:

    -the fact that most of us don't fully understand our own religion
    -we're severely intolerant of our own people yet kiss up to the Western lifestyle
    - we don't educate our own offspring about Sikhi or strengthen it, due to the fact that most Panjabis know only 2% of Sikhi and haven't educated themselves about it
    - "Orthodoxy" is either frowned upon or some a$$hole takes things too far
    -We betray our own kind and are easy sell outs
    - We try to Adapt to the western way of thought and life and try to understand our faith through those contexts and use them as our parameters in morality, ethics, and religion.
    -extreme Hypocrisy
    -Not uniting, even when we're in the west
    -Selfishness
    -preaching a concept and then contradicting it in actions and practice.

    These problems are in almost all communities, but these are really prevalent amongst us.
  2. Like
    Kuttabanda2 got a reaction from CdnSikhGirl in Brahmanization Of Sikhi / Sects? This Is Perhaps Why We Should Unite?   
    In regards to Kala Afghana, Inder Ghagga, Darshan Lal, Dhunda, etc. though some of their points in regards to Dera-Vaad are valid and important, these buffoons aren't so pure themselves.

    Not so long ago, Shivteg (ironic, isn't it? Name's Shivteg, and a missionary?) Sinh was caught with a Dhaddi Bibi.
    And Kala Afghana is rumored to have harassed a bibi.

    The Tapobani Singhs know a lot about these Dhurmat Professors and Gyanis, and even countered them.

    These people are the same people have twisted the meanings and words of Gurbani themselves yet accuse others of doing it.

    They wrongly say that Charitar means 'wiles' when it in fact means 'Character', thus making Charitropakhyan's meaning to be the "The wiles of women". Pulling a tukk from Dasam Patshah Ki Granth and twisting it whilst pushing other tukks under the carpet to suit their agenda.
  3. Like
    Kuttabanda2 reacted to Kaljug in What Is Future Of Sikh Community ?   
    After all your complaining about Singh Sabha incorrectly interpreting Gurbani tuks, you turn around and say "Oh Guru Ji didn't mean what he said. He must have meant something else."

    Your hypocrisy is incredible (and quite amusing to see).

    K.
  4. Like
    Kuttabanda2 got a reaction from SAadmin in Akj And Tenth Master   
    I would agree.
    I remember reading about 7 methods of avoiding Kaam which were really practical, and it wouldn't take a "high avastha" to abide by.
  5. Like
    Kuttabanda2 got a reaction from Lucky in Akj And Tenth Master   
    I would agree.
    I remember reading about 7 methods of avoiding Kaam which were really practical, and it wouldn't take a "high avastha" to abide by.
  6. Like
    Kuttabanda2 reacted to chatanga1 in Akj Is Not The Only Ones Who Say Women Should Tie Turbans...   
    It says "it is best". It is not compulsory.

    For someone who parrots the "i'm not in the akj" you seem to do a wonderful job of being their mouthpiece here.
  7. Like
    Kuttabanda2 got a reaction from harsharan000 in 24 Forms Of A Formless God?   
    I used a quote from Sri Guru Granth Sahib on the dieties being famous people ( characters from History and popular mythology) part. Sri Dasam Granth Sahib's philosophy is only understood when in line with Guru Granth Sahib Jee, if you look at them as two seperate scriptures, with no connection to each other, and use no philosophical basis of concepts from the First and primary Granth then you will form incorrect assumptions and conjectures. At least in my opinion.
  8. Like
    Kuttabanda2 got a reaction from harsharan000 in 24 Forms Of A Formless God?   
    @truthseeker546

    "yeah that's my point, on one hand you have the above verse, and on the other, you have chaubees avtar, chand di vaar. It seems to me that these texts were written by different people who had different ideas about who or what God is, hence the contradictions.

    As for your point of the avtaar being famous people, this is a weak attempt to try and reconcile the problem. If they were infamous/famous people then why are they mentioned in the chapter of 24 incarnations (of God), there were many famous people throughout history. why are these Hindu Gods mentioned?"

    The Avtar Katha was made for the Khalsa to learn moral and ethical lessons because those types of stories were more familiar to Indians, as Sikhi started in the Indian subcontinent. Sri Dasam Granth Sahib Jee is supposed to be understood within the parameters of Sri Guru Adi Granth Sahib Jee's concepts.
    Again, looking at Dasam Patshah Jee's bani like if it's a foreign Composition which is totally different to Guru Granth Sahib is not really smart, Because that's how people start doubting Dasam Bani.....and Voila! You have Bhasaurias and the Anti- Dasam Bani lobby.
    If you consider it to be a weak attempt, than that's your opinion.
    A majority of the Khalsa at the time was of Hindu Background, it's pretty logical to use historical and mythological figures whom they have knowledge of and can relate to. Sri Guru Gobind Singh Jee might have written about other historical figures and deities as well, we don't have his all of his Bani with us. Sri Dasam Granth Sahib Jee was made with strenuous effort of Bhai Mani Singh Jee to collect as much as he could. There was also the Vidya Sagar Granth which had compositions of the Kavis and himself. Since it's lost, we're not quite aware of all of it's content, the same goes for other Banis of Dasam Patshah.

    The entire Khalsa Panth uses Guru Granth Sahib's philosophy when understanding other Granths.



    As for Chandi Di Var:

    ਖੰਡਾ ਿਪ੍ਰਥਮੈ ਸਾਿਜ ਕੈ ਿਜਨ ਸਭ ਸੈਸਾਰੁ ੳੁਪਾਿੲਅਾ ॥
    "At first the Lord created the double-edged sword and then He created the whole world."

    ਬ੍ਰਹਮਾ ਿਬਸਨ ਮਹੇਸ ਸਾਿਜ ਕੁਦਰਤੀ ਦਾ ਖੇਲੁ ਰਚਾਿੲ ਬਣਾਿੲਅਾ ॥
    "He created Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva and then created the play of Nature."

    ਿਸੰਧ ਪਰਬਤ ਮੇਦਨੀ ਿਬਨੁ ਥੰਮਾ ਗਗਨ ਰਹਾਿੲਅਾ ॥
    He created the oceans, mountains and the earth made the sky stable without columns.

    ਿਸਰਜੇ ਦਾਨੋ ਦੇਵਤੇ ਿਤਨ ਅੰਦਰਿ ਬਾਦੁ ਰਚਾਿੲਅਾ ॥
    "He created the demons and gods and caused strife between them."

    Note: Devte is used to refer to Hindu Gods (whom we don't consider to be God or divine beings).

    ਤੈ ਹੀ ਦੁਰਗਾ ਸਾਿਜ ਕੈ ਦੈਤਾ ਦਾ ਨਾਸੁ ਕਰਾਿੲਅਾ ॥
    O Lord! By creating Durga, Thou hast caused the destruction of demons.
    -ਚੰਡੀ ਦੀ ਵਾਰ/ ਵਾਰ ਸ੍ਰੀ ਭਗੳੁਤੀ ਜੀ ਕੀ, ਪਾਿਤਸਾਹੀ ੧੦
    ^ what does this tell you about Chandi?



    "Chaubees Avtar was written so that the Sikhs did not have to rely Brahmins/Pandits. " umm so you have most of the dassam granth devoted to these deities. ?
    that makes a lot of sense. ?"

    So what if it's devoted to the Hindu Pantheon? It explains the Charitar (character) of each deity. Doesn't necessarily imply that the writer worships them or believe in them to be gods. Again, many of the Sikhs came from Hindu Background, do you expect him to use a figures or mythology irrelevant to their culture and social/cultural environment?




    "All these Avtars were written by the 10th Guru and the absolute oneness of God was written by the first Guru - either they had very different ideas on God or these books were tampered or changed. "

    Have you read the 6th chapter of Bachitar Natak? Sri Akal Ustat? Seems like you haven't.



    "One person gives me an answer these were only famous people not deities, another says no, they are temporary states of God on earth. That's just to point out one contradiction. Is this because some of the people here belong to Tat Kalsa (akali, Nihung) and the others to Sanatan Sikh sabah (nirmalas, namdhari) ???"


    Most people on here are groupies or members of Nanaksar, Nirmalas, Nihang Dals, or some other sect, and many times even within these sects, there are sub sects, and even within these sub sects people will differ on opinions, though usually the differences are resolved.
  9. Like
    Kuttabanda2 got a reaction from SAadmin in 24 Forms Of A Formless God?   
    Chandi, Vishnu, Brahma, Rudra/Shiva etc. Are not Gods, the 10th Patshah didn't worship them, as they (Gurus) make it clear in Sri Dasam Granth Sahib and Sri Guru Granth Sahib Itself.

    ਜੁਗਹ ਜੁਗਹ ਕੇ ਰਾਜੇ ਕੀਏ ਗਾਵਹਿ ਕਰਿ ਅਵਤਾਰੀ ॥
    ਤਿਨ ਭੀ ਅੰਤੁ ਨ ਪਾਇਆ ਤਾ ਕਾ ਕਿਆ ਕਰਿ ਆਖਿ ਵੀਚਾਰੀ ॥੭॥ -ਸ੍ਰੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਜੀ
    "In every age (Jugh/Yuga), He creates the kings, who are sung of as His Incarnations.
    Even they have not found His limits; what can One speak of and contemplate? ||7||"

    Note: the Word 'Avtari', The Guru is talking specifically of the Avtars (Hindu Pantheon).

    ਅਨਕ ਬ੍ਰਾਹਮਾ ਬਿਸ਼ਨ ਮਹੇਸ਼ਨੰ
    ਅਨਕ ਦੇਵੀ ਦੁਰਗਾ ਵੈਸ਼ਨੰ॥
    ਅਨਕ ਰਾਮ ਕਿਸ਼ਨ ਅਵਤਾਰਨੰ
    ਅਨਕ ਨਰਸਿੰਘ ਹਰਨਾਕਸ਼ ਮਾਰਨੰ॥-ਜੋਤਿ ਬਿਗਾਸ (ਮੂਲ ਪੰਜਾਬੀ) ਭਈ ਨੰਦ ਲਾਲ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ

    "There are Countless Brahmas, Vishnus, Maheshes, and countless Devis, Durgas, and Vaishnu Devis.
    There are numerous Rams and Krishna's Avtars.
    Countless Narsinghas slaying Harnakashs."

    There is no conflict between Polytheism and Monotheism in Sikhi, when there isn't Polytheism to begin with.

    ਸੋ ਮੁਖੁ ਜਲਉ ਜਿਤੁ ਕਹਹਿ ਠਾਕੁਰੁ ਜੋਨੀ ॥੩॥
    ਜਨਮਿ ਨ ਮਰੈ ਨ ਆਵੈ ਨ ਜਾਇ ॥
    ਨਾਨਕ ਕਾ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਰਹਿਓ ਸਮਾਇ ॥੪॥੧॥ -ਸ੍ਰੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਜੀ
    "Let that mouth be burnt, which says that our Lord and Master is subject to birth. ||3||
    He is not born, and He does not die; He does not come and go in reincarnation."

    The Guru has made it clear from the above Tukk that God does not reincarnate/ go through the cycle of birth and death. So how could these Avtars be his direct Incarnations?

    ਨਾਨਕ ਨਿਰਭਉ ਨਿਰੰਕਾਰੁ ਹੋਰਿ ਕੇਤੇ ਰਾਮ ਰਵਾਲ ॥
    ਕੇਤੀਆ ਕਨ੍ਹਹ ਕਹਾਣੀਆ ਕੇਤੇ ਬੇਦ ਬੀਚਾਰ ॥ -ਸ੍ਰੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਜੀ
    "O, Nanak, the Lord is fearless and formless; myriads of others, like Rama, are mere dust before Him.
    There are so many stories of Krishna, so many who reflect over the Vedas."

    ਬ੍ਰਹਮਾ ਿਬਸਨੁ ਮਹਾਦੇੳੁ ਤ੍ਰੈ ਗੁਣ ਭੁਲੇ ਹੳੁਮੈ ਮੋਹੁ ਵਧਾਿੲਅਾ ॥-ਸ੍ਰੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਜੀ
    "Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva wander in the three qualities, while their egotism and desire increase."

    These "Dieties" are no different than us, they aren't Unique.

    I've heard 3 points regarding the Hindu Pantheon:
    1) The Avtars are like another people (like humans), who exist but are practically nothing special, I was told this from my Taksali Ustad and Akhand Kirtani Jatha.
    2) They are/were just People in history who became Infamous or famous due to their actions and the Stories related to them.
    3) they are just people.

    Over all, they aren't supposed to be Worshipped nor are they God(s).

    ਦੋਹਰਾ॥
    ਅਕਾਲ ਪੁਰਖ ਕਉ ਛਾਡ ਕਰਿ ਭਜੈ ਦੇਵ ਕੋਈ ਅਉਰ
    ਜਨਮ ਜਨਮ ਭ੍ਰਮਤਾ ਫਿਰਹਿ ਲਹਹਿ ਨ ਸੁਖ ਕੀ ਠਉਰ ॥੧੬॥
    ਪਾਹਨ ਕੀ ਪੂਜਾ ਕਰੈ ਸਿਖ ਨ ਨਿਵਾਵਹਿ ਸੀਸ ਸੋ ਸਾਕਤ ਨਿਗੁਰਾ ਸਦਾ ਮਾਰਿਆ ਸ੍ਰੀ ਜਗਦੀਸ॥੧੭॥ -ਰਹਿਤਨਾਮਾ ਭਾਈ ਪ੍ਰਹਿਲਾਦ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ
    "They who leave Akaal Purkh, and start to worship Hindu deities,
    They will wander through birth after birth, and will never find true peace.
    They who do idol worship and do not treat another Sikh with respect.
    That person is forever without a Guru, and is destroyed by the Lord of the world."

    ਸਵੈਯਾ॥ ਪਾਿੲ ਗਹੇ ਜਬ ਤੇ ਤੁਮਰੇ ਤਬ ਤੇ ਕੋੳੂ ਅਾਂਖ ਤਰੇ ਨਹੀ ਅਾਨਯੋ ॥ ਰਾਮ ਰਹੀਮ ਪੁਰਾਨ ਕੁਰਾਨ ਅਨੇਕ ਕਹੈਂਂ ਮਤ ੲੇਕ ਨ ਮਾਨਯੋ॥ ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਬੇਦ ਸਬੈ ਬਹੁ ਭੇਦ ਕਹੈ ਹਮ ੲੇਕ ਨ ਜਾਨਯੋ ॥ ਸ੍ਰੀ ਅਸਪਾਨ ਿਕ੍ਰਪਾ ਤੁਮਰੀ ਕਰਿ ਮੈ ਨ ਕਹਯੋ ਸਭ ਤੋਿਹ ਬਖਾਨਯੋ ॥
    -ਚਉਬੀਸ ਅਵਤਾਰ, ਸ੍ੀ ਦਸਮ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਹਿਬ ਜੀ
    "Svaiyya ||
    O God ! the day when I caught hold of your feet, I do not bring anyone else under my sight; none other is liked by me now; the Puranas and the Quran try to know Thee by the names of Ram and Rahim and talk about you through several stories, but I do not acknowledge them.
    The Simritis, Shastras and Vedas describe several mysteries of yours, but I do not agree with any of them.
    O sword-wielder God! This all has been described by Thy Grace, what power can I have to write all this? || 863 ||

    The Guru made his point about these 24 Avtars quite clear in the Chaubees Avtar Bani itself. Chaubees Avtar was written so that the Sikhs did not have to rely Brahmins/Pandits. This Bani was written to envoke the feeling of Dharam Yudh to the Khalsa and give Moral lessons, just like in Sri Charitaropakhyan Sahib.

    ਚੌਪੲੀ ॥ ਮੈ ਨ ਗਨੇਸਿਹ ਿਪ੍ਰਥਮ ਮਨਾੳੂਂਂ ॥ ਿਕਸਨ ਿਬਸਨ ਕਬਹੂੰ ਨਿਹ ਿਧਅਾੳੂਂਂ ॥ ਕਾਨ ਸੁਨੇ ਪਹਿਚਾਨ ਨ ਿਤਨ ਸੋ ॥ ਿਲਵ ਲਾਗੀ ਮੋਰੀ ਪਗ ਿੲਨ ਸੋ ॥੨॥ - ਕ੍ਰਿਸ਼ਨ ਅਵਤਾਰ, ਸ੍ੀ ਦਸਮ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਹਿਬ ਜੀ
    Chaupai ||
    "I do not adore Ganesha in the beginning and also do not mediatate on Krishna and Vishnu; I have only heard about them with my ears and I do not recognize them; my consciousness is absorbed at the feet of the Supreme Kal (the Immanent Brahman I.e. God).434."

    Chandi Di Var, Sri Sarbloh Granth/Mangalacharan Puran, Chaubees Avtar, Brahma Avtar, Ram Avtar, Var Sri Bhagat Bhagouti, Hanuman Natak, and Chandi Charitars were written for Bir Raas, giving Moral lessons, and teaching the Khalsa Panth. Sri Dasam Patshah Ki Granth was written to properly shape the Charitar (character) and mind of a Sikh of the Sri Guru Khalsa Panth Sahib Jee.
  10. Like
    Kuttabanda2 got a reaction from harsharan000 in 24 Forms Of A Formless God?   
    Chandi, Vishnu, Brahma, Rudra/Shiva etc. Are not Gods, the 10th Patshah didn't worship them, as they (Gurus) make it clear in Sri Dasam Granth Sahib and Sri Guru Granth Sahib Itself.

    ਜੁਗਹ ਜੁਗਹ ਕੇ ਰਾਜੇ ਕੀਏ ਗਾਵਹਿ ਕਰਿ ਅਵਤਾਰੀ ॥
    ਤਿਨ ਭੀ ਅੰਤੁ ਨ ਪਾਇਆ ਤਾ ਕਾ ਕਿਆ ਕਰਿ ਆਖਿ ਵੀਚਾਰੀ ॥੭॥ -ਸ੍ਰੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਜੀ
    "In every age (Jugh/Yuga), He creates the kings, who are sung of as His Incarnations.
    Even they have not found His limits; what can One speak of and contemplate? ||7||"

    Note: the Word 'Avtari', The Guru is talking specifically of the Avtars (Hindu Pantheon).

    ਅਨਕ ਬ੍ਰਾਹਮਾ ਬਿਸ਼ਨ ਮਹੇਸ਼ਨੰ
    ਅਨਕ ਦੇਵੀ ਦੁਰਗਾ ਵੈਸ਼ਨੰ॥
    ਅਨਕ ਰਾਮ ਕਿਸ਼ਨ ਅਵਤਾਰਨੰ
    ਅਨਕ ਨਰਸਿੰਘ ਹਰਨਾਕਸ਼ ਮਾਰਨੰ॥-ਜੋਤਿ ਬਿਗਾਸ (ਮੂਲ ਪੰਜਾਬੀ) ਭਈ ਨੰਦ ਲਾਲ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ

    "There are Countless Brahmas, Vishnus, Maheshes, and countless Devis, Durgas, and Vaishnu Devis.
    There are numerous Rams and Krishna's Avtars.
    Countless Narsinghas slaying Harnakashs."

    There is no conflict between Polytheism and Monotheism in Sikhi, when there isn't Polytheism to begin with.

    ਸੋ ਮੁਖੁ ਜਲਉ ਜਿਤੁ ਕਹਹਿ ਠਾਕੁਰੁ ਜੋਨੀ ॥੩॥
    ਜਨਮਿ ਨ ਮਰੈ ਨ ਆਵੈ ਨ ਜਾਇ ॥
    ਨਾਨਕ ਕਾ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਰਹਿਓ ਸਮਾਇ ॥੪॥੧॥ -ਸ੍ਰੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਜੀ
    "Let that mouth be burnt, which says that our Lord and Master is subject to birth. ||3||
    He is not born, and He does not die; He does not come and go in reincarnation."

    The Guru has made it clear from the above Tukk that God does not reincarnate/ go through the cycle of birth and death. So how could these Avtars be his direct Incarnations?

    ਨਾਨਕ ਨਿਰਭਉ ਨਿਰੰਕਾਰੁ ਹੋਰਿ ਕੇਤੇ ਰਾਮ ਰਵਾਲ ॥
    ਕੇਤੀਆ ਕਨ੍ਹਹ ਕਹਾਣੀਆ ਕੇਤੇ ਬੇਦ ਬੀਚਾਰ ॥ -ਸ੍ਰੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਜੀ
    "O, Nanak, the Lord is fearless and formless; myriads of others, like Rama, are mere dust before Him.
    There are so many stories of Krishna, so many who reflect over the Vedas."

    ਬ੍ਰਹਮਾ ਿਬਸਨੁ ਮਹਾਦੇੳੁ ਤ੍ਰੈ ਗੁਣ ਭੁਲੇ ਹੳੁਮੈ ਮੋਹੁ ਵਧਾਿੲਅਾ ॥-ਸ੍ਰੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਜੀ
    "Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva wander in the three qualities, while their egotism and desire increase."

    These "Dieties" are no different than us, they aren't Unique.

    I've heard 3 points regarding the Hindu Pantheon:
    1) The Avtars are like another people (like humans), who exist but are practically nothing special, I was told this from my Taksali Ustad and Akhand Kirtani Jatha.
    2) They are/were just People in history who became Infamous or famous due to their actions and the Stories related to them.
    3) they are just people.

    Over all, they aren't supposed to be Worshipped nor are they God(s).

    ਦੋਹਰਾ॥
    ਅਕਾਲ ਪੁਰਖ ਕਉ ਛਾਡ ਕਰਿ ਭਜੈ ਦੇਵ ਕੋਈ ਅਉਰ
    ਜਨਮ ਜਨਮ ਭ੍ਰਮਤਾ ਫਿਰਹਿ ਲਹਹਿ ਨ ਸੁਖ ਕੀ ਠਉਰ ॥੧੬॥
    ਪਾਹਨ ਕੀ ਪੂਜਾ ਕਰੈ ਸਿਖ ਨ ਨਿਵਾਵਹਿ ਸੀਸ ਸੋ ਸਾਕਤ ਨਿਗੁਰਾ ਸਦਾ ਮਾਰਿਆ ਸ੍ਰੀ ਜਗਦੀਸ॥੧੭॥ -ਰਹਿਤਨਾਮਾ ਭਾਈ ਪ੍ਰਹਿਲਾਦ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ
    "They who leave Akaal Purkh, and start to worship Hindu deities,
    They will wander through birth after birth, and will never find true peace.
    They who do idol worship and do not treat another Sikh with respect.
    That person is forever without a Guru, and is destroyed by the Lord of the world."

    ਸਵੈਯਾ॥ ਪਾਿੲ ਗਹੇ ਜਬ ਤੇ ਤੁਮਰੇ ਤਬ ਤੇ ਕੋੳੂ ਅਾਂਖ ਤਰੇ ਨਹੀ ਅਾਨਯੋ ॥ ਰਾਮ ਰਹੀਮ ਪੁਰਾਨ ਕੁਰਾਨ ਅਨੇਕ ਕਹੈਂਂ ਮਤ ੲੇਕ ਨ ਮਾਨਯੋ॥ ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਬੇਦ ਸਬੈ ਬਹੁ ਭੇਦ ਕਹੈ ਹਮ ੲੇਕ ਨ ਜਾਨਯੋ ॥ ਸ੍ਰੀ ਅਸਪਾਨ ਿਕ੍ਰਪਾ ਤੁਮਰੀ ਕਰਿ ਮੈ ਨ ਕਹਯੋ ਸਭ ਤੋਿਹ ਬਖਾਨਯੋ ॥
    -ਚਉਬੀਸ ਅਵਤਾਰ, ਸ੍ੀ ਦਸਮ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਹਿਬ ਜੀ
    "Svaiyya ||
    O God ! the day when I caught hold of your feet, I do not bring anyone else under my sight; none other is liked by me now; the Puranas and the Quran try to know Thee by the names of Ram and Rahim and talk about you through several stories, but I do not acknowledge them.
    The Simritis, Shastras and Vedas describe several mysteries of yours, but I do not agree with any of them.
    O sword-wielder God! This all has been described by Thy Grace, what power can I have to write all this? || 863 ||

    The Guru made his point about these 24 Avtars quite clear in the Chaubees Avtar Bani itself. Chaubees Avtar was written so that the Sikhs did not have to rely Brahmins/Pandits. This Bani was written to envoke the feeling of Dharam Yudh to the Khalsa and give Moral lessons, just like in Sri Charitaropakhyan Sahib.

    ਚੌਪੲੀ ॥ ਮੈ ਨ ਗਨੇਸਿਹ ਿਪ੍ਰਥਮ ਮਨਾੳੂਂਂ ॥ ਿਕਸਨ ਿਬਸਨ ਕਬਹੂੰ ਨਿਹ ਿਧਅਾੳੂਂਂ ॥ ਕਾਨ ਸੁਨੇ ਪਹਿਚਾਨ ਨ ਿਤਨ ਸੋ ॥ ਿਲਵ ਲਾਗੀ ਮੋਰੀ ਪਗ ਿੲਨ ਸੋ ॥੨॥ - ਕ੍ਰਿਸ਼ਨ ਅਵਤਾਰ, ਸ੍ੀ ਦਸਮ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਹਿਬ ਜੀ
    Chaupai ||
    "I do not adore Ganesha in the beginning and also do not mediatate on Krishna and Vishnu; I have only heard about them with my ears and I do not recognize them; my consciousness is absorbed at the feet of the Supreme Kal (the Immanent Brahman I.e. God).434."

    Chandi Di Var, Sri Sarbloh Granth/Mangalacharan Puran, Chaubees Avtar, Brahma Avtar, Ram Avtar, Var Sri Bhagat Bhagouti, Hanuman Natak, and Chandi Charitars were written for Bir Raas, giving Moral lessons, and teaching the Khalsa Panth. Sri Dasam Patshah Ki Granth was written to properly shape the Charitar (character) and mind of a Sikh of the Sri Guru Khalsa Panth Sahib Jee.
×
×
  • Create New...