tonyhp32

Here is a great video of an interview of Vikram Singh Khalsa the former Hindu youth who threw a shoe at Badal. He has taken Amrit recently.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Dr2aP5gAz8&list=UUeiRdb5QKNbNKUXD9aSe8dw


Surinder Singh's youtube channel has some great interviews and if you want to understand what is happening in Sikh circles in Punjab then this is the channel you should be watching.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeiRdb5QKNbNKUXD9aSe8dw

As one of the main factors which led to the ousting of the Muslims from East Punjab especially the Sikh dominated areas was to create space for the resettling of Sikh refugees from West Punjab then it is natural that either Hindus refugees from West Punjab not be allowed to resettle in East Punjab and if possible Hindus already there be also ousted.

With the ousting of the Muslims even without the resettling of Sikh refugees, the districts of Amritsar, Ludhiana, Firozpur, had become Sikh majority districts. Add to this the fact that Hindus in Jalandhar were 50.37% of the population compared to 48.8% of Sikhs and the Sikhs dominated the rural areas. In Gurdaspur Hindus were 51% and the Sikhs were 40% and apart from Pathankot tehsils the Sikhs dominated the rural areas of the district. Only in Hoshiarpur was the difference between Sikhs and Hindus large in number. Hindus were and Sikhs were 25% and Hindus 75%, Again in some tehsils Sikhs were a majority in the rural areas. The Sikhs were also a majority in Patiala, Faridkot and Nabha states and the Punjabi speaking areas of Jind state.

So if the plan had been to create an independent Sikh state in 1947 then you would not have seen the resettlement of Hindu refugees from West Punjab being resettled in East Punjab. Given the lack of law and order and the precarious nature of the new government in Delhi then the Sikhs would have been successful in denying the settlement of Hindus in East Punjab. It would not make sense to allow a fifth column of Sikh haters to settle in areas that had a Sikh majority. Had these Hindus not been allowed to settle in East Punjab and been instead settled in Haryana areas or Jammu and Sikh refugees solely been settled in East Punjab, the Punjab today would have had a Sikh majority of over 80% and the Sikhs would have been a majority in both the rural and urban areas. There would have been no Punjab problem as the tiny Hindu minority would not have been able to act as a fifth column in Punjab and be hostile to the just demands of the state. The Punjabi Hindus would have had more clout in Haryana and could even have been a majority in some of the districts like Karnal, Panipat etc. If the Hindus already living in Sikh areas of East Punjab also been ousted and moved to Haryana. There would have an independent Sikh state and the Indian state of Haryana would have had a Punjabi Hindu problem!

This is how the Sikhs of the 18th century viewed the role of the Khalsa in this world. That the Mosques and Mandirs, the Qurans and Purans would all be destroyed and the Khalsa would reign supreme.

Hindus fools like Sherni and others useless Hindu idiots think that the Khalsa was created to protect the Hindus and went to Hardwar following Hindus rites!

Wow, I thought you were an expert on Sikhi having sprouted your BS views about Sikhi in the last year. Read Uggardanti as well, from which the RSS use some tuks out of context or mistranslate to claim that Khalsa wanted the Hindu dharm to be supreme. Both works outline the Sikh worldview which is totally contrary to the one you Hindus like to espouse of Sikhs being just a bunch of Keshdhari Hindus.

This is how the Sikhs of the 18th century viewed the role of the Khalsa in this world. That the Mosques and Mandirs, the Qurans and Purans would all be destroyed and the Khalsa would reign supreme.

Hindus fools like Sherni and others useless Hindu idiots think that the Khalsa was created to protect the Hindus and went to Hardwar following Hindus rites!

The visits to Hardwar were never regular and only took place when persons who were recent converts to Sikhi would keep up their ancestral routine of visiting Hardwar and getting the Pandas to record their visits. However when Sikhs were in the Doab to collect Rakhi or during the Kumbh then Sikh Rajas would attend with their armies. There is an instance of one such visit in 1796 which didn't end too well for the Hindus.

http://gt1588.com/iwitness-attack-on-fakirs-1796/

One of the amusing thing here is the way the Hindus have been posting videos of a minor sword fight at Durbar Sahib to show Sikhs in a bad light yet their Kumbh Mela resulted in violence between various sadhu groups in which thousands have been killed.

What's a harami like you living in Canada for? Pi$$ off to Hindu land and then your rants about colonialism would be justified. The biggest fake identity is the Hindu identity, any ar%ehole can worship a rat, a monkey, shiva's lulla and any manner of shyt and he can still be a fully paid up member of the biggest fake religion in the world!

Back to the shipping container again? People do desperate things to get out if shytholes. Hindu refugees have done more extreme things to escape from Sri Lanka. They even took of their clothes when their asylum claims had been rejected and they were due to be deported to Bangladesh from where they had arrived.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/february/17/newsid_4162000/4162645.stm

In the second picture all the cyber coolies have the Indian flag by their desks in case they forget what shythole of a country they are in

Sarey Jahan se accha Cyber Coolistan hamara !

Indian progress

From This



To this



The only difference now is that they even take on the white man's names. At least as real coolies they were still Gangu and Laloo now they are Gaary and Loouie!

Dumb Hindu. We are talking about a Quam riven by disunity with traitors leading it and yet it manages to feed all it's people. Then you have a nation state with all the organisation that entails with the power to raise taxes and a presence in each village and yet it cannot feed all of it's people.

Sikhs despite the Badals are doing well, you should look after your own people who are dying at the rate of 2.5 Million each year from hunger. You Hindu haramis cry about the Muslims having killed 70-80 Million Hindus during their conquest of your country and yet you don't care about double that number who have died of hunger since the British left.

Your responses to my questioning you and the other Hindu Punjabi haramis is that you never have a direct answer for why you allow 2,5 Million of your fellow Hindus to die from hunger. Again you give the laughable answer that Sikhs are on borrowed time! Sala Hindu aapde ghar nu agg lagi hoveh tey sarhda hoiya Sikhan nu kahay tuhade ghar nu agg lagan wali hai!

I don't worship Shiva's admin cut. If you and your family does then that's your look out. Probably saves the need for a dildo for your family I suppose. Damn clever you Hindus!

Here's your sisters. Harami before you complain you bought sisters into it.

I don't worship Shiva's admin cut. If you and your family does then that's your look out. Probably saves the need for a dildo for your family I suppose. Damn clever you Hindus!

Here's your sisters. Harami before you complain you bought sisters into it.

The Indian mentality is that they are the best in the world even if half the population shit$ in the open and goes to sleep hungry. Give an Indian a thousand examples of how is country is a $hithole and he will come up with one example of how his country has done something worthwhile and claim that it shows how great his country is.

The Indian mentality is that they are the best in the world even if half the population shit$ in the open and goes to sleep hungry. Give an Indian a thousand examples of how is country is a $hithole and he will come up with one example of how his country has done something worthwhile and claim that it shows how great his country is.

The Indian mentality is that they are the best in the world even if half the population shit$ in the open and goes to sleep hungry. Give an Indian a thousand examples of how is country is a $hithole and he will come up with one example of how his country has done something worthwhile and claim that it shows how great his country is.

Jat bashing again by the Bahman! Lets dissect another uniquely Hindu trait which I like to call Hindu Bull$hit.

Myth 1: Jats responsible for female foeticide.
Jats form the majority of the rural areas of Punjab. The male female ratio in rural Punjab in 2011 was 907:1000 that is for unparh Bahman moorkahs means there were 907 females for every 1000 males in rural Punjab. For the urban areas it was 875 females for 1000 males. The complete opposite of what the Bahman myth maker would have us believe.

I am not denying that female foeticide did not occur but all classes of people indulged in this disgraceful behaviour, even Bahmans indulged in it. But to try and portray this as something that just the Jats do is the hight of idiocy.

Myth 2: The Putt Jattan de culture was created by Jats

This is the result of urban filmmakers of the 1980s making films that would appeal to the rural audience. Punjabi films never do well in the urban areas mainly due to the inherent hatred of the urban Hindus for the Punjabi language. So Punjabi film makers make films for rural audiences and so they follow the majority culture of rural Punjab. Even traditional folk singers who are mainly non-Jat sing of the majority culture of the rural areas which has the agriculturalist at it's hub. As for the Kharkoos, none pi$$ed in their pants as the Bahman myth maker would like us to believe. When faced with the Police and Army they fought like lions. These Kharkoos were not only Jats but came from all classes of Punjabi society. Even many Pandit boys from rural areas joined the Kharkoo ranks and proved that when given a just cause that even Pandits need not emulate their cowardly ancestors as the Bahmans on here do and that they can fight like lions just as the rest of the Kharkoos did.

Read the somewhat pro-India biased article of this-;

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/hindu-youths-join-hands-with-sikh-militants-in-punjab-leave-police-baffled/1/306535.html

Myth 3: Chasm between 'sister' communities created by Jats

This is another example of Hindu bull$hit. The two communities were never sister communities. I think the Bahman is a victim of the GOI and Doordarshan propaganda as examplified by film serials of the 1980s and 1990s and the oft repeated example of the eldest son of a Hindu family being a Sikh etc. The above were never the norm but belonged to a particular area of Punjab - the Pothohar area to which the chief propagandists of these examples belonged such as Khushwant Singh who used the example of one area of Punjab as if this was the norm in the whole of Punjab. In the core Sikhs areas of Majha-Doaba-Malwa there was no such thing as 'sister' community relationship between Sikhs and HIndus. In Pothohar due to the parchar of Baba Khem Singh Bedi the non-Muslims of Pothohar were either Keshdhari Sikhs, Sehajdhari Sikhs and Hindus. The roti-beti relationship was mainly between the Keshdhari Sikhs and the Sehajdhari Sikhs. The raising of the eldest son as a Sikh mainly happened when a childless Hindu couple or a couple who only had daughters would seek the blessings at Sikh shrines in the region for a son and would vow to raise that son as a Sikh. If a son was born then he would be raised a Sikh but any other sons that came along would be raised as Hindus or Sehajdhari Sikhs as no vow had been made for their birth. What really clinches the issue is that no couple ever made a daughter born after the vow was made and say a daughter was born, they did not raise her as a Sikh!

India has one third of world's poorest, says World Bank
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/india/10003228/India-has-one-third-of-worlds-poorest-says-World-Bank.html

Rather than this foki mashoori wouldn't you be more proud if India actually managed to eradicate the poverty of over half it's population rather than sending a mission to Mars?

The Hindu scumbag is trying to divide Sikhs into Jats and Non-Jats. Unfortunately some idiots are taking the bait with their own anti-Jat agenda. I do think that just as that Hindu jungchamkaur has a homosexual fixation on Rajputs, 'sherni' has a homosexual fixation on Jats.

The Akhbar-i-Darbar-i-Mualla of November 30, 1711 informs that “the rebel Guru [banda Singh Bahadur] wrote to Raja Ajit Singh and Raja Jai Singh that they come to his territory. They [the Sikhs] should be considered to have reached their territory. The Rajas killed the spies of the rebels and told that they were the servants of the Emperor. The rebels would be captured or killed soon.” It further adds, "Muhammed Amin Khan wrote to Raja Ajit Singh and Raja Ajit Singh if they jointly marched against the rebel leader they could capture or kill him soon. The Rajas wrote in reply that the matter be reported to the Emperor. In case the Mughals were attacked by the rebels they [Rajas] would immediately reach there".The Mughals who entertained apprehensions that the Rajput Rajas were in league with the Sikhs, had very tactfully prevented the Rajas to enter into any understanding with the Sikhs. To recapitulate, we can say that when the Sikhs under the leadership of Banda Singh Bahadur were fighting the Mughals to establish their own rule, the Rajput chiefs were sitting on the fringe totally unconcerned. They were satisfied to administer their hereditary possessions under the suzerainty of the Mughals. Unfortunately, they spurned Banda Singh Bahadur's proposal of Sikh–Rajput alliance which would have been a formidable challenge to the Mughal empire at that time.

The guy is a Hindu loser who hasn't achieved much in his life apart from some bogus political science degree so he needs to portray himself as a Sikh to have some level of self respect. Interesting point, have you ever come across a Sikh pretending to be a Hindu online and yet there are literally thousands of Hindu losers pretending to the Sikhs. Historically the only way a Hindu in Punjab could stop being a dhimmi and have any self respect was to become a Sikh. Maybe this is a modern day perversion of that process.

The guy is a Hindu loser who hasn't achieved much in his life apart from some bogus political science degree so he needs to portray himself as a Sikh to have some level of self respect. Interesting point, have you ever come across a Sikh pretending to be a Hindu online and yet there are literally thousands of Hindu losers pretending to the Sikhs. Historically the only way a Hindu in Punjab could stop being a dhimmi and have any self respect was to become a Sikh. Maybe this is a modern day perversion of that process.

You obviously don't understand politics. All movements especially national liberation movements have ebbs and flows. It might not be as strong at the moment in Punjab but given that the youth especially the educated youth are getting more and more involved in the movement this will change soon. Just as the youth of 1984 were at the forefront of the liberation struggle so will this generation and the next generation will be. When the people resolve to throw out their occupiers and oppressors then nothing in the world can stop them, Just look at Scotland, the people there have the same rights as the English and yet there is now a majority to make Scotland independent. Look at how Punjab is treated as an Indian colony and how Scotland is treated.

You can use all the abuse you want, the time will come when Hindu fascists like you whose hatred of the Sikhs have contributed to the marginalisation of their own community will get their just deserts.

Mulraj was a victim of circumstances, his troops killed the British officers sent to replace him. He revolted because he had no other option otherwise his soldiers would have strung him up as well. Mulraj was not the last man standing, it was Sher Singh Attariwala and his father. The Mulraj revolt was technically a revolt against the Khalsa Raj as the British according to the treaty of Bhyrolwal were the regents acting on behalf of the Maharaja. Sher Singh went to enforce the rule of the Maharaja and when he realised what the British plans were he revolted. Multan was always a sideshow, the fiercest fighting took place in the Chenab-Jhelum river areas. The Malwa Maharajas were lackeys of the British and their interests lay in either the status quo or a British takeover of the Punjab. States such as Jind were lukewarm in their support of the British and the Maharaja of Ladwa joined the Khalsa army as did many of the Sikhs of Malwa who used to waylay the British stragglers and kill them. Now the question is where are the Hindu Punjab Maharajas in all this? Nowhere because they did not exist! You claim that the Sikhs cut their mother into three but most of the areas that became Haryana and Himachal were never Punjabi speaking and had either become a part of Punjab because of the Sikh conquest (Kangra ) or been added to Punjab by the British as in the southern Haryana districts. What the Punjabi Hindus did by their betrayal is was to take Punjabi speaking areas such as Ambala, Una, Sirsa, Fatehabad from the Punjab and into the Hindi and Pahari speaking states. It was your people that cut their mother into three!