chatanga1

bibi harjas kaur ji, can you point out where anyone on this forum has applauded what akaal das posted? No one bothered to comment on it, cos it wasn;t even worth it. Now tell me is us being silent just as bad as applauding akaal das' copy and paste effort from a numskull muslim site?

Bibi Harjas Kaur Ji, why are you barking up this tree and no so much of a whimper on the next? You obviously are very talented at debating, the place for your skills is that website where your mind wil be wonderfully opened. As for me being banned it wasnt for writing that any women, never mind hindu women are whores, but that my Guru was not the son of a hand-maid. You have a grievance with people writing against Hindus, not that i like it either, but you are strangley silent when it comes to people writing the same against Sikhs. What do you see when you lookin the mirror?

bibi harjas kaur ji. so nice to hear from you after so long. have you taken your superb arguments to the hindu-sikh brotherhood site? I've been banned from there, as I posted something they didnt like, so tey deleted my account. But they have a lot of insults about your Guru there. I think that is the forum where you need to air your: "Can you show where it says in Gurbani that Sikhs should attack and mock other religions? Please! Because I would like to understand your personal justification for writing anti-Hindu garbage like this," and replace the terminology of sikhs for hindus. I would like to see how my hindu brothers react to your reasoning. And please post he link here so we can all read it. Thanks in advance.

i thing that is quite insulting thatyou say that. Guru Ji respected other faiths even those at odds with gurmat. Why did Guru Ji give his head for freedom owr worship? The fact that these people went form gurmat is not thier fault but the fault of sikh institutions which have become rotten.

bro, if i keep saying this people are gonna say I hate nihangs or summat. But if you wanna start with the beadbi-wale then prob you wanna start a little closer to home.

I dont think anubody here denies Nidar Singh skills, but we are digressing from the topic. Mr Landa, forgve me but it sounds like you hate the akj. anyways, how would one qualify to wear this bana? who would conduct the test? what does one have to do to pass? what if a cheater (akj'er etc)wears one, how do we get it off them? i hope you will see that this topic is a non-starter. it will only induce bickering, and not have any practical or workable conclusion.

Lol. isnt that the best way to go? be ishnaaned, listen to chandi di war, and then THUD!, and hearing AKAL!!! only Goats with Kamaiee get this fortunate path. Im just a chatanga waiting. True there are many amazing nihang singhs, who's jeevani is something else.

dear mr landa was not the biggest stain on the nihang bana, those sided with the indian govt for money in 84 and beyond? and deserted their own? was not the biggest stain on the nihang bana, those who kept their heads down when Aad Guru Darbar was set on fire? your words about the akj may be right, but dont give that nihangs are are holier than thou attitude and pretend that they are any more deserving to wear this bana than any other sikhs. as Sant Jarnail Singh used to say, to keep weapons and harm others is a sin, but to keep weapons and fail to uphold dharma is a greater sin. Did you see ay evidence of Nihang SInghs upholdeing dharma over the last 25 years? the very first abusers of the bana are thos eyou trying to big-up. It won't work.

not the kind of analogy you could give in a gurdwara etc is it?

fear of Bapu's juti helps more most desi's study harder.

i think it was his health and lack of medicine that drove him to it. still, hunger, and pain/disease is a strong force that will drive men to lengths they wouldnt normally think of. i think cos this guys also had young children he prob thort that it would be best for the whole family's future. it is a shame cos he looked the part in bana.

good work by some brothers.

another vid to look at while you're there. for those who cant understand Panjabi too well.

Mithar, you have made an excellent point. The britsish did get their own sau-sakhi written to confuse sikhs. could this have been another effort?

its da one strike kill thing isnt it. it just looks kinda funny more than anything. what if the blood was needed for tilak of shastar? would you get enough blood from the goat this way?

partakh means " to leave no doubt" or shanka in anyones mind. its something that is blatant, undisputable etc.

could be. but i think that the guy who told me had nothing to do with this debate/argument over Nihang Nidar Singh.

spot on.

probably. but they had so much time to say so as the morcha went on for almost 2 years, but they never even opened their mouths to say we do or do not support the panth, but suddenly when the army action has happened Baba Santa Singh, says that he would have done such and such. but for 2 years not a squeak out of him.

i was told about this by someone who was there. they saw the the guy put the gun to his head. dont think that it has to be on video just to be proved.

when did sikhs or singhs become known as nihang singhs? formally.

has anyone tried it sukh-nidhaan here?

was that Baba Santa Singh Ji talking early intha prog? if so, then how long ago was this film made? and didnt a nihang singh shoot a goat? can anyone explain this?

watched a bit of it. boring. who are these fundamentalists and what would they have a problm with?

Good thinking!