Singh123456777

Does amazon.in ship to canada?

Currently reading Bhai Bala Jis Janamsakhi, Dasmesh Darshan written by Vedata Singh Teer, Amir Bhandar Teeka, Saurkutavli and skimming through Gur Kian Sakhiyan, Gur sobha and Sri gur katha

Shaheedi degh has been used since the times of the Guru Sahib, and the khalsa was never a Vegetarian religion. Now in sikhi there are three paths. One is the path of bhagti, one is path of ghristi and one is path of the warrior. The sikh who follows the path of bhagti and or ghristi should not consume meat. The khalsa that is following the path of the warrior is allowed to partake in jhatka meat and ONLY jhatka. No other meat is allowed. 
 
Sant Baba Surjeet Singh Ji Nihang does not eat meat because they are on the path of bhagti and teaching.

If you want more info about Shaheedi degh and Jhatka we can make another topic about it. 

^^^ I like this

Congratulations veer Ji.Do not let the child that Waheguru gave you be misled and stray onto a bad path.Always stay in nimrita and be grateful to Waheguru because Waheguru can take the child away.Now do a sehaj path and try making the child hear every word of the pavitaar bani.Do ardaas that the child will be of high gursikhi jeevan.Take him to the panj pyare and give him choola Amrit.Teach the child all that you know and make him love doing simran,seva,kirtan,gurbani etc at a small age.Dont let society get to your child first.Society will mess your child up.Keep your child in line.Love your child as well.Dont spoil him.Have a happy life with your child

I know right! Sounds like what very good people would do! Sell their daughters to sex trade.

Then leave

Happy new years!

You may purchase male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you. You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in your land. You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as a permanent inheritance. You may treat your slaves like this, but the people of Israel, your relatives, must never be treated this way. Leviticus 25:44-46 NLT
When a man sells his daughter as a slave, she will not be freed at the end of six years as the men are. If she does not please the man who bought her, he may allow her to be bought back again." Exodus 21: 7-8
Slavery is allowed in the bible as well as sex slavery.
Hmmmmm
I will not comment anymore

Happy new years!

Then leave

You may purchase male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you. You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in your land. You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as a permanent inheritance. You may treat your slaves like this, but the people of Israel, your relatives, must never be treated this way. Leviticus 25:44-46 NLT
When a man sells his daughter as a slave, she will not be freed at the end of six years as the men are. If she does not please the man who bought her, he may allow her to be bought back again." Exodus 21: 7-8
Slavery is allowed in the bible as well as sex slavery.
Hmmmmm
I will not comment anymore

Listening to katha helps get that spark back. Thats why katha was done in the first place. Katha about shaheedis, sakas etc all help

I had three family members die and one brutally tortured from 1984-1990 so you can shut your fuckin mouth you little shit. 

Major Burnnnnnnnnnn

Because most people cant be arsed with your usual drivel. You keep harping on about science but its apparent you're about as good at science as Ranjit Singh is at controlling his bowels.
We say Sciences is limited to the material and Gurbani transcends all that. You wanted proof and we gave you loads from Gurbani about miracles happening but apparently since science says no, you'll just say Gurbani is false.
We've asked 10 times now, FIND 1 SOURCE pre-1800, anything that says all the things you do. You claim to have core sikhi down so show us. 
Nice, so you cherry picked stuff to prove your point. Did you forget Gurbani also says that God is antarjami (all knowing) that's not possible as a universal consciousness is unscientific as atoms aren't life. Guru Ji also says God gives his Bhagats whatever they want, He's benevolent. The God you keep going on about is impersonal and doesn't care one way or another as Nature is impersonal and thus unable to be benevolent at all, survival of anything else is unimportant to it as it has no sense of self.
The God of Guru Nanak Dev Ji has personal and impersonal guns, so stop ignoring one for the other because it deletes your entire premise.
I've read Stephen Hawking's work, he explicitly points out that God for him=universe. The universe created itself, it doesn't need a creator. Gurbani says that God created this universe and countless others i.e it wasn't self creating. 
shocking, as you hate Hindus yet the Vedas contain EVERYTHING that Spinoza talks about. But "muh hindus bad bad" right?
Before I dissect this "article" (I wouldn't even call it this as its nonsense written by someone with no grasp of either science or basic Gurmat) Congraulations on posting something from Ranjit Singh's own page  you claimed here you don't follow him but you seem to link his crap left, right and centre. I got to ask, has you initiated you into his jatha with mouth to mouth simran? or have you guys gone a bit further?  I just hope he managed to teach you to control your bowels better than he can.
Someone should pick up a physics book once in a while. Everything at the core might be the same, but on larger scales they can be completely different, just like Brahman can expand into infinite beings and each of them are wearing different guises (thus "different") but at the core are the same. Properties change depending on what you adapt
I almost choked on my taco over this. What a load of nonsense, and the fact that you buy into it really makes me chuckle. You want to talk about laws of nature that's fine. So tell me why Guru Nanak Dev Ji didn't sit down and write down all these theories then and there, He could have. You're gonna say "oh cuz the superficial masses wouldn't accept him etc etc" but here's the little snag in your stupid logic. That form of thought was already prevalent in India, that Nature=God=Laws of Nature, it had many forms, namely Ājīvika and Charvaka. Read them, they pretty much say what you're saying. Reincarnation is wrong etc etc.
What more crap, let's take some of these "laws" as you guys call them.  Morality falls into this, these laws have no right or wrong yet Gurmat always does. By your logic it would be ok to force yourself on a women if it was for the progression of the species? By your own logic, yes. What law in the universe says that God (or as you dudes say "nature") laughs and takes a saroop to give darshan to Bhagat Naamdev Ji. What law says that a cow that's been dead for ages comes back to life and God himself gives Darshan to Bhagat NaamDev Ji, what law of science says that Man can float on water without aid like Bhagat Kabir Ji (all these are some of the countless examples in Gurbani). Science is restricted but God isn't bound by it, he can make and break them as he wishes.
No one says that, Science is the most plausible explanation of a certain event, its an uncertainty (that's the very definition of the scientific principle). Gurbani is absolute, For a  Sikh Gurbani will always be above science, not on the same level.
no it isn't. That goes against the very definition of what religion is. 
In that exact text Guru Gobind Singh Ji has a conversation with Waheguru, so tell me how an unfathomable God who's inaccessible is talking to him. 

Whats funny is how in puratan granths there is panktis that are written about sikhs drinking sharaab 🤔. Who are we to know whats right or wrong. Again im not promoting alcohol even one bit, all im saying is we need to look at context before we categorize something and make it a rule.

It is the intention of the thing. Did he go out and buy beef so he can eat it? No it was a mistake. Unknowingly a human eats many bugs and kills many animals very single day. Should we go pesh every single day? Or when we kangha our kesh and a few strands break off should we go pesh? The guru knows your intention behind everything. Mistakes happen all the time and we don't know it. Read the Sakhi that I posted. It addresses the issue. If the poster feels like he committed a huge sin then he should go and pesh. But minor things like this happen all the time. Maharaj Ji did not Pakhand. I knew of a Singh who used to pesh if he are pizza from the store. Even if the gurduwara bought it he ate it and then did pesh. Doing pesh etc is becoming a ritual now. When Singhs used to go in battle and when they used to get cut guarantee even a tiny hair strand was cut(unless the sword missed any hair on the body) so would that make the Singhs a patit? Hell no! The guru is all knowing and forgiving. I have seen people coming to do pesh for taking Advil cause it had opium or something like that lol. Did they need to come? No. Puratan Singhs used to do shaheedi degh when they were injured in battle. Taking Advil with opium or alcohol is to help the body. If you abuse Advil and take it like drugs then go pesh.
 
For the poster I recommend taking a hukamnama from maharaj Ji and then he will get his answer.

What happened in th Sakhi is that a Singh got captured by Mughals and they circumcised him, cut his hair, fed him halal meat(not jhatka) and did Muslim rites on that Singh. When the Singh was freed he came to maharaj Ji and told maharaj Ji the whole ordeal. Maharaj Ji asked if he had sexual intercourse with a Muslim woman and the Singh said no. Maharaj Ji said that you are still a sikh of maharaj Ji. This is the gist of this Sakhi. 
FYI scholars like dally, chatanga or Amardeep might know and my translations might be wrong.

I haven't watched the video (yet), but I'd be sceptical to believe what he says. It's well known he's a bit of a vegi fascist and that he has an agenda.
Jhatka and some of the other controversial things, which I should add are only controversial because of some of the attitudes that crept into the panth, are pretty much accepted across the board, even by those who feel it goes against their own specific maryada. Sant Gurbachan Singh Ji themselves weren't against this even if they did promote vegetarianism. Having said that I do agree that jhatka and eating maas is only for a certain section of the panth.
Just because he doesn't agree with it doesn't make it bullshit/interpolation/manmat. Plenty of other Mahapurkhs have quoted Suraj Prakash and they haven't said anything of the sort.
 
Gurbar Akaal!

Sanchain are volumes of guru granth sahib ji and steeks give meanings and arths of gurbani.

Listen bro, you got to prioritise learning Gurmukhi asap. It ain't that hard if you do it the right way (and already know how to speak Panjabi). 

Welcome aboard my brother